Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

How are collaboration and productivity correlated at various career stages of scientists?

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Collaboration is believed to be influential on researchers’ productivity. However, the impact of collaboration relies on factors such as disciplines, collaboration patterns, and collaborators’ characters. In addition, at different career stages, such as the growth or the establishment career stages of scientists, collaboration is different in scale and scope, and its effect on productivity varies. In this paper, we study the relationships between collaboration and productivity in four disciplines, Organic Chemistry, Virology, Mathematics and Computer Science. Our study found that the productivity is correlated with collaboration in general, but the correlation could be positive or negative on the basis of which aspect of collaboration to measure, i.e., the scale or scope of the collaboration. The correlation becomes stronger as individual scientists progress through various stages of their career. Furthermore, experimental disciplines, such as Organic Chemistry and Virology, have shown stronger correlation coefficients than theoretical ones such as Mathematics and Computer Science.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beaver, D. B. (1979). Studies in scientific collaboration: part II. Scientific co-authorship, research productivity and visibility in the French scientific elite, 1799–1830. Scientometrics, 1(2), 133–149.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Beaver, D. B., & Rosen, R. (1978). Studies in scientific collaboration: part I. The professional origins of scientific co-authorship. Scientometrics, 1(3), 65–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birnholtz, J. P. (2007). When do researchers collaborate? Toward a model of collaboration propensity. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 58(14), 2226–2239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonaccorsi, A., & Daraio, C. (2003). Age effects in scientific productivity: The case of the Italian National Research Council (CNR). Scientometrics, 58(1), 49–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bozeman, B., & Corley, E. (2004). Scientists’ collaboration strategies: Implications for scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 33(4), 599–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corley, E. A., & Sabharwal, M. (2010). Scholarly collaboration and productivity patterns in public administration: Analysing recent trends. Public Administration, 88(3), 627–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costas, R., & Van Leeuwen, T. N. (2010). A bibliometric classificatory approach for the study and assessment of research performance at the individual level: The effects of age on productivity and impact. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 61(8), 1564–1581.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, J. N., & Kiesler, S. (2007). Coordination costs and project outcomes in multi-university collaborations. Research Policy, 36(10), 1620–1634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Defazio, D., Lockett, A., & Wright, M. (2009). Funding incentives, collaborative dynamics and scientific productivity: Evidence from the EU framework program. Research Policy, 38(2), 293–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, J., & Bozeman, B. (2005). Academic careers, patents, and productivity: Industry experience as scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 34(3), 349–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding, W. W., Levin, S. G., Stephan, P. E., & Winkler, A. E. (2010). The impact of information technology on academic scientists’ productivity and collaboration patterns. Management Science, 56(9), 1439–1461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duque, R. B. (2005). Collaboration paradox: Scientific productivity, the Internet, and problems of research in developing areas. Social Studies of Science, 35(5), 755–785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franceschet, M., & Costantini, A. (2010). The effect of scholar collaboration on impact and quality of academic papers. Journal of Informetrics, 4(4), 540–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He, Z.-L., Geng, X.-S., & Campbell-Hunt, C. (2009). Research collaboration and research output: A longitudinal study of 65 biomedical scientists in a New Zealand university. Research Policy, 38(2), 306–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, J., & Huang, D. (2010). Correlation between impact and collaboration. Scientometrics, 86(2), 317–324.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, D., Görtz, R., & Heidler, R. (2009). Knowledge production and the structure of collaboration networks in two scientific fields. Scientometrics, 83(1), 219–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landry, R. (1998). The impact of transaction costs on the institutional structuration of collaborative academic research. Research Policy, 27(9), 901–913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science, 35(5), 673–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang, L., Kreschmer, H., Guo, Y., & Beaver, D. deB. (2001). Age structures of scientific collaboration in Chinese computer science. Scientometrics, 52(3), 471–486.

  • Link, A. N., Paton, D., & Donald, S. S. (2002). An analysis of policy initiatives to promote strategic research partnerships. Research Policy, 31(8–9), 1459–1466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perkmann, M., & Walsh, K. (2009). The two faces of collaboration: Impacts of university-industry relations on public research. Industrial and Corporate Change, 18(6), 1033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porac, J. (2004). Human capital heterogeneity, collaborative relationships, and publication patterns in a multidisciplinary scientific alliance: A comparative case study of two scientific teams. Research Policy, 33(4), 661–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W. W. (1998). Learning from collaboration: Knowledge and networks in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries. California Management Review, 40(3), 228–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pravdi, N., & Olui -Vukovi, V. (1986). Dual approach to multiple authorship in the study of collaboration/scientific output relationship. Scientometrics, 10(5), 259–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savanur, K., & Srikanth, R. (2009). Modified collaborative coefficient: A new measure for quantifying the degree of research collaboration. Scientometrics, 84(2), 365–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sooryamoorthy, R. (2009). Collaboration and publication: How collaborative are scientists in South Africa? Scientometrics, 80(2), 419–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Super, D. E. (1980). A life-span, life-space approach to career development. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 16(3), 282–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoshikane, F., Nozawa, T., Shibui, S., & Suzuki, T. (2008). An analysis of the connection between researchers’ productivity and their co-authors’ past attributions, including the importance in collaboration networks. Scientometrics, 79(2), 435–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoshikane, F., Nozawa, T., & Tsuji, K. (2006). Comparative analysis of co-authorship networks considering authors’ roles in collaboration: Differences between the theoretical and application areas. Scientometrics, 68(3), 643–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. WISE Lab, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China

    Zhigang Hu & Zeyuan Liu

  2. Joint-Institute for the Study of Knowledge Visualization and Scientific Discovery, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China

    Zhigang Hu, Chaomei Chen & Zeyuan Liu

  3. Joint-Institute for the Study of Knowledge Visualization and Scientific Discovery, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA

    Chaomei Chen

  4. College of Computing and Informatics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA

    Chaomei Chen

Authors
  1. Zhigang Hu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chaomei Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zeyuan Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhigang Hu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hu, Z., Chen, C. & Liu, Z. How are collaboration and productivity correlated at various career stages of scientists?. Scientometrics 101, 1553–1564 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1323-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1323-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation