Abstract
The recent literature on high skilled labor migration has taken a turn from analyzing processes of ‘brain drain’ to processes of ‘brain gain’ and ‘brain circulation’. Returning scientists, having been affiliated to foreign institutes, are able to facilitate knowledge exchanges between the two locations, and facilitate the linkage of the national scientific community to international scientific cooperation projects. In this way, return scientists can have a disproportionate impact on the development of the scientific community in their country of origin. However, not all flows of return migrants have had such a positive impact. Returnees failed to affect developments in some localities, while producing ambiguous effects in others. These studies typically argue that the impact of return migrants is dependent on the absorptive capacity and the local social, cultural, and institutional context in the country of origin. Using data on return migrants within the Taiwanese economic academic community, this paper seeks to add to this literature by arguing that the impact of return migrants is not only dependent on the circumstances in their country of origin, but is also contingent on the nature and quality of the context in which they acquired their international labor experience. Skills and access to knowledge networks are heterogeneously spread over geographical space, so that the context in which a return migrant acquired his or her international labor experience matters.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ackers, L. (2005). Moving people and knowledge: Scientific mobility in the European Union1. International Migration, 43(5), 99–131.
Agrawal, A., Cockburn, I., & McHale, J. (2006). Gone but not forgotten: Knowledge flows, labor mobility, and enduring social relationships. Journal of Economic Geography, 6(5), 571–591.
Agrawal, A., Kapur, D., McHale, J., & Oettl, A. (2011). Brain drain or brain bank? The impact of skilled emigration on poor-country innovation. Journal of Urban Economics, 69(1), 43–55.
Amin, A., & Cohendet, P. (2004). Architectures of knowledge: Firms, capabilities, and communities. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bathelt, H., Malmberg, A., & Maskell, P. (2004). Clusters and knowledge: Local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography, 28(1), 31–56.
Bozeman, B., & Corley, E. (2004). Scientists’ collaboration strategies: Implications for scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 33(4), 599–616.
Breschi, S., & Lissoni, F. (2003). Mobility and social networks: localised knowledge spillovers revisited. CESPRI Working Paper, No. 142.
Chen, Y.-C. (2008). The limits of brain circulation: Chinese returnees and technological development in Beijing. Pacific Affairs, 81(2), 195–215.
Coe, N. M., & Bunnell, T. G. (2003). ‘Spatializing’ knowledge communities: Towards a conceptualization of transnational innovation networks. Global Networks, 3(4), 437–456.
Coupé, T. (2003). Revealed performances: Worldwide rankings of economists and economics departments, 1990–2000. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(6), 1309–1345.
Dahl, M. S., & Pedersen, C. Ø. R. (2004). Knowledge flows through informal contacts in industrial clusters: Myth or reality? Research Policy, 33(10), 1673–1686.
Docquier, F., Faye, O., & Pestieau, P. (2008). Is migration a good substitute for education subsidies? Journal of Development Economics, 86(2), 263–276.
Docquier, F., & Rapoport, H. (2009). Documenting the Brain Drain of «la Crème de la Crème»: Three case-studies on international migration at the upper tail of the education distribution. (pp. 1–35). Ramat Gan: Bar-Ilan University, Department of Economics.
Filatotchev, I., Liu, X., Buck, T., & Wright, M. (2009). The export orientation and export performance of high-technology SMEs in emerging markets: The effects of knowledge transfer by returnee entrepreneurs. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(6), 1005–1021.
Giuliani, E. (2007). The selective nature of knowledge networks in clusters: Evidence from the wine industry. Journal of Economic Geography, 7(2), 139–168.
Glänzel, W. (2001). National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship relations. Scientometrics, 51(1), 69–115.
Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2005). Analysing scientific networks through co-authorship. In H. Moed, W. Glänzel, & U. Schmoch (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative science and technology research (pp. 257–276). Dordrecht: Springer.
Hsu, J.-Y., & Saxenian, A. (2000). The limits of Guanxi capitalism: Transnational cooperation between Taiwan and the USA. Environment and Planning A, 32, 1991–2005.
Jonkers, K., & Tijssen, R. (2008). Chinese researchers returning home: Impacts of international mobility on research collaboration and scientific productivity. Scientometrics, 77(2), 309–333. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-1971-x.
Jöns, H. (2009). ‘Brain circulation’ and transnational knowledge networks: Studying long-term effects of academic mobility to Germany, 1954–2000. Global Networks, 9(3), 315–338.
Kale, D., Wield, D., & Chataway, J. (2008). Diffusion of knowledge through migration of scientific labour in India. Science and Public Policy, 35(6), 417–430.
Kim, M.-J. (1999). Korean international co-authorship in science 1994–1996. Journal of Information Science, 25, 403–412.
Laudel, G. (2003). Studying the brain drain: Can bibliometric methods help? Scientometrics, 57(2), 215–237.
Leta, J., & Chaimovich, H. (2002). Recognition and international collaboration: The Brazilian case. Scientometrics, 53(3), 325–335.
Lucas, M., Sands, A., & Wolfe, D. (2009). Regional clusters in a global industry: ICT clusters in Canada. European Planning Studies, 17(2), 189–209.
Meyer, J.-B. (2001). Network approach versus brain drain: Lessons from the diaspora. International Migration, 39(5), 91–110.
Mullings, B. (2011). Diaspora strategies, skilled migrants and human capital enhancement in Jamaica. Global Networks, 11(1), 24–42.
Owen-Smith, J., & Powell, W. W. (2004). Knowledge networks as channels and conduits: The effects of spillovers in the Boston Biotechnology Community. Organization Science, 15(1), 5–21.
Pan, S.-Y. (2011). Education abroad, human capital development, and national competitiveness: China’s brain gain strategies. Frontiers of Education in China, 6(1), 106–138.
Podolny, J. M., Stuart, T. E., & Hannan, M. T. (1996). Networks, knowledge, and niches: Competition in the Worldwide semiconductor industry, 1984–1991. American Journal of Sociology, 102(3), 659–689.
Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996). Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1), 116–145.
Rothaermel, F. T., & Hess, A. W. (2007). Building dynamic capabilities: Innovation driven by individual-, firm-, and network-level effects. Organization Science, 18(6), 898–921.
Saxenian, A. (1994). Regional advantage: Culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Saxenian, A. (2002). The Silicon Valley connection: Transnational networks and regional development in Taiwan, China and India. Science Technology and Society, 7(1), 117–149.
Saxenian, A. (2005). From brain drain to brain circulation: Transnational communities and regional upgrading in India and China. Studies in Comparative International Development (SCID), 40(2), 35–61.
Saxenian, A. (2006). The new Argonauts (regional advantage in a global economy). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Saxenian, A., & Sabel, C. (2008). Venture capital in the “periphery”: The new Argonauts, global search, and local institution building. Economic Geography, 84(4), 379–394.
Schiller, D., & Revilla Diez, J. (2008). Mobile star scientists as regional knowledge spillover agents. IAREG Working paper. Hannover: Leibniz University.
Sorenson, O., Rivkin, J. W., & Fleming, L. (2007). Informational complexity and the flow of knowledge across social boundaries. In K. Frenken (Ed.), Applied evolutionary economics and economic geography (pp. 147–159). Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar.
Sorenson, O., & Stuart, T. E. (2001). Syndication networks and the spatial distribution of venture capital investments. American Journal of Sociology, 106(6), 1546–1588.
Wagner, C. S., & Leydesdorff, L. (2005). Network structure, self-organization, and the growth of international collaboration in science. Research Policy, 34(10), 1608–1618.
Woolley, R., Turpin, T., Marceau, J., & Hill, S. (2008). Mobility matters: Research training and network building in science. Comparative Technology Transfer and Society, 6(3), 159–184.
Yang, R., & Welch, A. R. (2010). Globalisation, transnational academic mobility and the Chinese knowledge diaspora: An Australian case study. Discourse Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 31(5), 593–607.
Zhang, W.-B. (2003). Taiwan’s modernization: Americanization and modernizing Confucian manifestations. River Edge, NJ: World Scientific.
Zhou, P., & Leydesdorff, L. (2006). The emergence of China as a leading nation in science. Research Policy, 35(1), 83–104.
Zucker, L. G., Darby, M. R., & Armstrong, J. S. (2002). Commercializing knowledge: University science, knowledge capture, and firm performance in biotechnology. Management Science, 48(1), 138–153.
Zweig, D. (2006). Competing for talent: China’s strategies to reverse the brain drain. International Labour Review, 145(1–2), 65–90.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Velema, T.A. The contingent nature of brain gain and brain circulation: their foreign context and the impact of return scientists on the scientific community in their country of origin. Scientometrics 93, 893–913 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0751-4
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0751-4