Skip to main content
Log in

The role of Chinese–American scientists in China–US scientific collaboration: a study in nanotechnology

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we use bibliometric methods and social network analysis to analyze the pattern of China–US scientific collaboration on individual level in nanotechnology. Results show that Chinese–American scientists have been playing an important role in China–US scientific collaboration. We find that China–US collaboration in nanotechnology mainly occurs between Chinese and Chinese–American scientists. In the co-authorship network, Chinese–American scientists tend to have higher betweenness centrality. Moreover, the series of polices implemented by the Chinese government to recruit oversea experts seems to contribute a lot to China–US scientific collaboration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beaver, D. B., & Rosen, R. (1978). Studies in scientific collaboration. I. The professional origins of scientific co-authorship. Scientometrics, 1(1), 65–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti, S. P. (2002). NetDraw: Graph visualization Software. Harvard: Analytic Technologies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bozeman, B., & Corley, E. (2004). Scientists’ collaboration strategies: Implications for scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 33(4), 599–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, H., Kostoff, R. N., Chen, C., Zhang, J., Vogeley, M. S. E., Börner, K., et al. (2009). AI and global science and technology assessment. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 24(4), 68–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson Frame, J., & Carpenter, M. P. (1979). International research collaboration. Social Studies of Science, 9(4), 481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., & De Lange, C. (2002). A distributional approach to multinationality measures of international scientific collaboration. Scientometrics, 54(1), 75–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He, T. (2009). International scientific collaboration of China with the G7 countries. Scientometrics, 80(3), 571–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin, B., & Rousseau, R. (2005). China’s quantitative expansion phase: exponential growth but low impact. In P. Ingwersen & B. Larsen (Eds.), ISSI 2005: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on scientometrics and informetrics. Stockholm.

  • Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostoff, R. N., Briggs, M., Rushenberg, R., Bowles, C. A., Icenhour, A. S., Nikodym, K. F., et al. (2007a). Chinese science and technology? Structure and infrastructure. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74(9), 1539–1573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostoff, R. N., Koytcheff, R. G., & Lau, C. G. Y. (2007b). Global nanotechnology research metrics. Scientometrics, 70(3), 565–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luukkonen, T., Persson, O., & Sivertsen, G. (1992). Understanding patterns of international scientific collaboration. Science, Technology and Human Values, 17(1), 101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melin, G. (2000). Pragmatism and self-organization: Research collaboration on the individual level. Research Policy, 29(1), 31–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, M., Debackere, K., & Glänzel, W. (2010). Can applied science be ‘good science’? Exploring the relationship between patent citations and citation impact in nanoscience. Scientometrics, 85(2), 527–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, M. E. J. (2001). Scientific collaboration networks. I. Network construction and fundamental results. Physical Review E, 64(1), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, M. E. J. (2004). Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101(Suppl 1), 5200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, L., & Shapira, P. (2011). China–US scientific collaboration in nanotechnology: Patterns and dynamics. Scientometrics, 88(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research is supported by the project of “Social Science Foundation of China” (Grant No. 10CZX011), the project of “Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China” (Grant No. 2009041110001), as well as the project of “Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities” (Grant No. DUT10RC(3)021).

Besides, we really appreciate the great help from two anonymous reviewers, especially one of whom offered many specific suggestions for linguistic improvements.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xianwen Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, X., Xu, S., Liu, D. et al. The role of Chinese–American scientists in China–US scientific collaboration: a study in nanotechnology. Scientometrics 91, 737–749 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0693-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0693-x

Keywords

Navigation