Abstract
Conventional patent citation analyses have focused mainly on the presence of citation relationships, the number of patents cited by the subject patent, and the number of times the subject patent is cited by others (i.e., the numbers of backward and forward citations of the subject patent). However, most of them have not focused on patent classifications. Assuming that a patent based on a variety of technological bases tends to be an important patent that is cited more often, this study examines and clarifies the relationship between the diversity of classifications assigned to backward citations and the number of forward citations for Japanese patents. The results show notable differences in the number of classifications assigned to backward citations between the often cited and less frequently cited groups. It is considered that the diversity of backward citations can be utilized in the evaluation criteria for grouping that roughly identifies the often cited patents or eliminates a large part of less frequently cited patents.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Egghe, L., & Rousseau, R. (1991). Transfer principles and a classification of concentration measures. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(7), 479–489.
Hall, B. H., Jaffe, A., & Trajtenberg, M. (2005). Market value and patent citations. The Rand Journal of Economics, 36(1), 16–38.
Harhoff, D., Narin, F., Scherer, F. M., & Vopel, K. (1999). Citation frequency and the value of patented inventions. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 81(3), 511–515.
Lariviere, V., & Gingras, Y. (2010). On the relationship between interdisciplinarity and scientific impact. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(1), 126–131.
Nagaoka, S. (2005). Patent quality, cumulative innovation and market value: Evidence from Japanese firm level panel data (IIR Working Paper, WP#05-06). Tokyo: Institute of Innovation Research, Hitotsubashi University.
Nanba, H., Fujii, A., Iwayama, M., & Hashimoto, T. (2008). Overview of the patent mining task at the NTCIR-7 workshop. In: Proceedings of NTCIR-7 workshop meeting (pp. 325–332). Tokyo: National Institute of Informatics.
Narin, F. (1994). Patents bibliometrics. Scientometrics, 30(1), 147–155.
Narin, F. (1995). Patents as indicators for the evaluation of industrial research output. Scientometrics, 34(3), 489–496.
Pratt, A. D. (1977). A measure of class concentration in bibliometrics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 28(5), 285–292.
Sato, Y., & Iwayama, M. (2006). A study of patent document score based on citation analysis. Information Processing Society of Japan SIG Technical Report, 2006(59), 9–16.
WIPO (World Intellectual Property Organization). (2010). International Patent Classification (IPC) [Web Page]. Available: http://www.wipo.int/classifications/ipc/en/.
Yoshikane, F., Kiyokawa, A., Tsuji, K., Kawamura, S., & Suzuki, T. (2011). Changes in citation patterns in interdisciplinary research areas. In: Proceedings of the 13th international conference of the international society for scientometrics and informetrics (ISSI 2011) (pp. 1082–1084). KwaDlangezwa: University of Zululand.
Acknowledgments
This work was partially supported by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) 23500294 (2011) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan, and we would like to show our gratitude to the support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yoshikane, F., Suzuki, Y. & Tsuji, K. Analysis of the relationship between citation frequency of patents and diversity of their backward citations for Japanese patents. Scientometrics 92, 721–733 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0612-6
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0612-6