Skip to main content
Log in

A new family of scientific impact measures: The generalized Kosmulski-indices

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article introduces the generalized Kosmulski-indices as a new family of scientific impact measures for ranking the output of scientific researchers. As special cases, this family contains the well-known Hirsch-index h and the Kosmulski-index h (2). The main contribution is an axiomatic characterization that characterizes every generalized Kosmulski-index in terms of three axioms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ball, P. (2005), Index aims for fair ranking of scientists. Nature, 436: 900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bornmann, L., H. D. Daniel (2005), Does the h-index for ranking of scientists really work? Scientometrics, 65(3): 391–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bornmann, L., H. D. Daniel (2007), What do we know about the h-index? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(9): 1381–1385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronin, B., L. T. Meho (2006), Using the h-index to rank influential information scientists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(9): 1275–1278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W. (2006), On the h-index: A mathematical approach to a new measure of publication activity and citation impact. Scientometrics, 67(2): 315–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, J. E. (2005), An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(46): 16569–16572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, J. E. (2007), Does the h-index have predictive power? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(49): 19193–19198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kosmulski, M. (2006), A new Hirsch-type index saves time and works equally well as the original h-index. ISSI Newsletter, 2: 4–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., R. Rousseau (2007), Hirsch-type indices and library management: The case of Tongji University Library. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (ISSI’2007), pp. 514–522.

  • Oppenheim, C. (2007), Using the h-index to rank influential British researchers in information science and librarianship. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(2): 297–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, R. (2007), The influence of missing publications on the Hirsch index. Journal of Informetrics, 1: 2–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Raan, A. F. J. (2006), Comparison of the Hirsch-index with standard bibliometric indicators and with peer judgement for 147 chemistry research groups. Scientometrics, 67(3): 491–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woeginger, G. J. (2008), An axiomatic characterization of the Hirsch-index. Mathematical Social Sciences, 56: 224–232.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vladimir G. Deineko.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Deineko, V.G., Woeginger, G.J. A new family of scientific impact measures: The generalized Kosmulski-indices. Scientometrics 80, 819–826 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-2130-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-2130-0

Keywords

Navigation