Skip to main content
Log in

Mapping institutions and their weak ties in a specialty: A case study of cystic fibrosis body composition research

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper demonstrates visualization technique that show the collaboration structure of institutions in the specialty and the researchers that function as weak ties among them. Institution names were extracted from the collection of papers and disambiguated using the Derwent Analytics (v1.2) software product. Institutions were clustered into collaboration groups based on their co-occurrence in papers. A crossmap of clustered institutions against research fronts, which were derived using bibliographic coupling analysis, shows the research fronts that specific institutions participate in, their collaborator institutions and the research fronts in which those collaborations occurred. A crossmap of institutions to author teams, derived from co-authorship analysis, reveals research teams in the specialty and their general institutional affiliation, and further identifies the researchers that function as weak ties and the institutions that they link. The case study reveals that the techniques introduced in this paper can be used to extract a large amount of useful information about institutions participating in a research specialty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Björneborn, L., Ingwersen, P. (2001), Perspectives of webometrics. Scientometrics, 50(1): 65–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Börner, K., Penumarthy, S., Meiss, M., Ke, W. M. (2006), Mapping the diffusion of scholarly knowledge among major us research institutions. Scientometrics, 68(3): 415–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chubin, D. E. (1976), Conceptualization of scientific specialties. Sociological Quarterly, 17(4): 448–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debackere, K., Clarysse, B. (1998). Advanced bibliometric methods to model the relationship between entry behavior and networking in emerging technological communities. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(1): 49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Nooy, W., Mrvar, A., Batagelj, V. (2005), Exploratory Social Network Analysis with Pajek. New York, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otte, E., Rousseau, R. (2002), Social network analysis: a powerful strategy, also for the information sciences. Journal of Information Science, 28(6): 441–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. S. (1973), The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 778(6): 1360–1380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Havemann, F., Heinz, M., Kretschmer, H. (2006), Collaboration and distances between German immunological institutes. Journal of Biomedical Discovery and Collaboration, 1(1): 6–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. S., Martin, B. R. (1997), What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26: 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kretschmer, H., Aguillo, I. F. (2004), Visibility of collaboration on the web. Scientometrics, 61(3): 405–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kretschmer, H., Kretschmer, U., Kretschmer, T. (2005), Visibility of collaboration between immunology institutions on the web including aspects of gender studies. Paper presented at the 10th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, (pp.750–760). Stockholm, Sweden: Karolinska University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L. (1998), Theories of citation? Scientometrics, 43(1): 5–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melin, G., Persson, O. (1996), Studying research collaboration using co-authorships. Scientometrics, 36(3): 363–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, S. A., Boyack, K. W. (2005), Visualizing 60 years of anthrax research, 10th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, (pp. 45–55). Stockholm, Sweden: Karolinska University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, S. A., Yen, G. (2004), Crossmaps: Visualization of overlapping relationships in collections of journal papers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States, 101(suppl. 1): 5291–5296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, S. A., Yen, G., Wu, Z., Asnake, B. (2003), Time line visualization of research fronts. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(5): 413–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagpaul, P. S. (2002), Visualizing cooperation networks of elite institutions in India. Scientometrics, 54(2): 213–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pencharz, PB, Durie, PR (2000), Pathogenesis of malnutrition in cystic fibrosis, and its treatment. Clinical Nutrition, 19(6): 387–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salton, G. (1989), Automatic Text Processing: the Transformation, Analysis and Retrieval of Information by Compute. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, C. S. (2005), Six case studies of international collaboration in science. Scientometrics, 62(1): 3–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, S., Faust, K., Iacobucci, D. (1994), Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liying Yang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yang, L., Morris, S.A. & Barden, E.M. Mapping institutions and their weak ties in a specialty: A case study of cystic fibrosis body composition research. Scientometrics 79, 421–434 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0428-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0428-9

Keywords

Navigation