Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Introducing the Current Contribution Index for characterizing the recent, relevant impact of journals

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Garfield (Impact) Factor characterizes the measure of the up to date specific contribution of scientific journals to the total impact of the journals in a special field. A new indicator (Current Contribution Index, CCI) was introduced in order to characterize the relative contribution of journals to recent, relevant knowledge of a corresponding field. The CC Index relates the number of citations received by a journal in a given year to the total number of citations obtained by all journals of the corresponding field in that year. Mean Garfield Factors and mean Current Contribution Indexes were calculated for some fields and several journals. No significant correlation was found between the Garfield Factor (GF) and Current Contribution Index (CCI) of journals. The ratios of the GF to CCI referring to the corresponding top 10, 20 or 50 per cent of the journals ranked by decreasing GF and CCI, strongly differ by field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bergstrom, C. (2007), Eigenfactor: Measuring the value and prestige of scholarly journals, College & Research Libraries News, 68(5) (www.eigenfactor.org)

  • Braun, T., Glänzel, W., Schubert, A. (1990), Publication productivity: From frequency distributions to scientometric indicators, Journal of Information Science, 16: 37–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, T., Glänzel, W., Schubert, A. (2006), A Hirsch-type index for journals, Scientometrics, 69: 169–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egghe, L., Rousseau, R. (1990), Introduction to Informetrics. Quantitative Methods in Library, Documentation and Information Science. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, E., Sher, I. H. (1963), New factors in the evaluation of scientific literature through citation indexing, American Documentation, 14: 195–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, E. (1976), Significant journals of science, Nature, 264: 609–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., Schoepflin, U. (1999), A bibliometric study of reference literature in the sciences and social sciences, Information Processing & Management, 35: 31–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., Schlemmer, B., Thijs, B. (2003), Better late than never? On the chance to become highly cited only beyond the standard bibliometric time horizon, Scientometrics, 58: 571–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W. (2006), On the h-index — A mathematical approach to a new measure of publication activity and citation impact, Scientometrics, 67: 315–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, P. L. K., Gross, E. M. (1927), College libraries and chemical education, Science, 66: 385–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, J. E. (2005), An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102: 16569–16572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narin, F., Pinski, G., Gee, H. H. (1976), Structure of the biomedical literature, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 27: 25–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seglen, P. O. (1992), The skewness of science, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 43: 628–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seglen, P. O. (1994), Causal relationship between article citedness and journal impact, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45: 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vinkler, P. (1988), Bibliometric features of some scientific subfields and the scientometric consequences therefrom, Scientometrics, 14: 453–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vinkler, P. (1997), Relations of relative scientometric impact indicators. The Relative Publication Strategy Index, Scientometrics, 40: 163–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vinkler, P. (2001), An attempt for defining some basic categories of scientometrics and classifying the indicators of evaluative scientometrics, Scientometrics, 50: 539–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vinkler, P. (2002), The institutionalization of scientific information. The Scientometric Model (ISI-S MODEL), Library Trends, 50: 553–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinkler, P. (2004), Characterization of the impact of sets of scientific papers: The Garfield (Impact) Factor, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55: 431–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vinkler, P. (2006), Composite scientometric indicators for evaluating publications of research institutes, Scientometrics, 68: 629–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Chemical Research Center, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Pusztaszeri út 59-67, H-1025, Budapest, Hungary

    Péter Vinkler

Authors
  1. Péter Vinkler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Péter Vinkler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vinkler, P. Introducing the Current Contribution Index for characterizing the recent, relevant impact of journals. Scientometrics 79, 409–420 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0427-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0427-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation