Skip to main content
Log in

Structure and research performance of Spanish universities

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to describe Spanish universities by means of structural, input and output indicators, to explore the relationship between those indicators and to analyse university behaviour in different dimensions. Seniority of the universities and environmental conditions are taken into account, together with input and output indicators, as well as others related to the networks and links established. Our results will contribute to the knowledge of the university research system in Spain, producing data that could be useful for research management at the institutional, regional and national level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AQUAMETH (2007), Position paper of the Project AQUAMETH. Positioning European Universities in the world landscape. Evidence and policy insights. PRIME General Conference Pisa, January 29–February 1, 2007.

  • Bonaccorsi, A., Daraio, C. (Eds) (2007), Universities and Strategic Knowledge Creation: Specialization and Performance in Europe. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham.

    Google Scholar 

  • CINDOC (2005), La investigación del CSIC a través de sus publicaciones científicas de difusión internacional (1981–2003), CINDOC, Madrid. Available at http://www.csic.es/documentacion.do

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Y., Liu, N. C. (2006), A first approach to the classification of the top 500 world universities in their disciplinary characteristics using scientometrics. Scientometrics, 68(1): 135–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Miguel, J., Caïs, J., Vaquera, E. (2001), Excelencia. Calidad de las Universidades Españolas. Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas, Madrid.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez, I., Sancho, R., Bordons, M., Fernandez, M. T. (2006), La I+D en España a través de publicaciones y patentes. In: Sebastián, J., Muñoz, E. (Eds), Radiografía de la Investigación Pública en España. Biblioteca Nueva. Madrid, pp. 275–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • INE, Instituto Nacional De Estadística. http://www.ine.es/inebase

  • Leydesdorff, L., Meyer, M. (2003), The Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Scientometrics, 58(2): 191–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moed, H. F. (2006), Bibliometric Ranking of World Universities. CWTS Report 2006-01. Leiden.

  • Narin, F., Stevens, K., Whitlow, E. S. (1991), Scientific cooperation in Europe and the citation of multinational co-authored papers. Scientometrics, 21(3): 313–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, A. D. (1977), A measure of class concentration in bibliometrics. JASIS, 28: 285–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SJTU (2005), Academic Ranking of World Universities-2005. Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Institute for Higher Education. http://ed.sjtu.edu.cn/rank/2005/ARWU2005Main.htm (7 Nov. 2006)

  • THES (2005), World University Rankings. Who is Number One? The Times Higher Education Supplement. http://www.thes.co.uk/worldrankings/ (7 Nov. 2006)

  • Universities UK (2003), Funding Research Diversity Technical Report. Universities UK, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Raan, A. F. J. (2008) Bibliometric statistical properties of the 100 largest European universities: prevalent scaling rules in the science system. JASIST, 59(3): 461–475, Available at: www.cwts.nl/Cwts/Stat4AX-JASIST.pdf

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Visser, M. S., Calero, C. M., Moed, H. F. (2007), Beyond Rankings: the role of large research universities in the global scientific communication system. In: Torres-Salinas, D., Moed, H. F. (Eds), Proceedings of ISSI2007. CINDOC-CSIC, Madrid, pp. 761–765.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zitt, M., Ramanana-Rahary, S., Bassecoulard, E., Laville, F. (2003), Potential science-technology spill-overs in regions: an insight on geographic co-location of knowledge activities in the EU. Scientometrics, 57(2): 295–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zitt, M., Filliatrreau, G. (2007), Big is (made) beautiful. Some comments about the Shanghai ranking of world-class universities. In: Sadlak & Liu (Eds), The World-Class University and Ranking: Aiming Beyond Status, UNESCO-CEPES/Cluj University Press, Romania: Institute of Higher Education, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China, pp.141–160.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Isabel Gómez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gómez, I., Bordons, M., Fernández, M.T. et al. Structure and research performance of Spanish universities. Scientometrics 79, 131–146 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0408-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0408-0

Keywords

Navigation