Skip to main content
Log in

Characteristics and link structure of a national scholarly Web space: The case of South Korea

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study performs a webometric analysis to explore the communication characteristics of scientific knowledge in a national scholarly Web space comprising top ranking universities and government supported research institutions in South Korea. We found significant differences in scholarly communication activity as well as linking behavior among different subspaces in addition to institutional differences. We also found the usefulness of the ADM approach in analyzing the metric data containing extreme outliers and discovered the directory model as the most appropriate. Page counts were found significantly correlated with inlinks as well as with outlinks at the directory level in the whole scholarly Web space.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bar-Ilan, J. (2004), A microscopic link analysis of academic institutions within a country — The case of Israel, Scientometrics, 59(3): 391–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Ilan, J. (2005), What do we know about links and linking? A framework for studying inlinks in academic environments, Information Processing and Management, 41: 973–986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjorneborn, L., Small-world link structures across an academic Web space: A library and information science approach, Royal School of Library and Information Science, Copenhagen, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chu, H., He, S., Thelwall, M. (2002), Library and information science schools in Canada and USA: A webometric perspective, Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 43(2): 110–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faba-Perez, C., Zapico-Alonso, F., Guerrero-Bote, V. P. (2005), Comparative analysis of webometric measurements in thematic environments, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(8): 779–785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haas, S. W., Grams, E. S. (2000), Readers, authors, and page structure: A discussion of four questions arising from a content analysis of web pages, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(2):181–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harries, G., Wilkinson, D., Price, L., Fairclough, R., Thelwall, M. (2004), Hyperlinks as a data source for science mapping, Journal of Information Science, 30(5): 436–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harter, S. P., Ford, C. E. (2000), Web-based analysis of e-journal impact: Approaches, problems, and issues, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(3): 1157–1176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingwersen, P. (1998), The calculation of Web Impact Factors, Journal of Documentation, 54(2): 236–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamada, T., Kawai, S. (1989), An algorithm for drawing general undirected graphs, Information Processing Letters, 31(1):7–15.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kousha, K., Thelwall, M. (2007a), Google scholar citations and Google Web/URL citations: A multidiscipline exploratory analysis, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(7): 1055–1065.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kousha, K., Thelwall, M. (2007b), How is science cited on the Web? A classification of Google unique Web citations, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(11): 1631–1644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, X. (2003), A review of the development and application of the Web impact factor, Online Information Review, 27(6): 407–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, X., Thelwall, M., Musgrove, P., Wilkinson, D. (2003), The relationship between the links/Web Impact Factors of computer science departments in UK and their RAE(Research Assessment Exercise) ranking in 2001, Scientometrics, 57(2): 239–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qiu, J., Chen, J., Wang, Z. (2004), An analysis of backlink counts and Web Impact Factors for Chinese university websites, Scientometrics, 60(3): 463–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, R., Thelwall, M. (2003), Disciplinary differences in US academic departmental Web site interlinking, Library & Information Science Research, 25(4): 437–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, R., Thelwall, M. (2004), Patterns of national and international Web inlinks to US academic departments: An analysis of disciplinary variations, Scientometrics, 60(3): 475–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thelwall, M. (2001a), Extracting macroscopic information from Web links, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(13): 1157–1168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thelwall, M. (2001b), Results from a Web Impact Factor crawler, Journal of Documentation, 57(2): 177–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thelwall, M. (2002a), A comparison of sources of links for academic Web impact factor calculations, Journal of Documentation, 58(1): 60–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thelwall, M. (2002b), Conceptualizing documentation on the Web: An evaluation of different heuristicbased models for counting links between university Web sites, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(12): 995–1005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thelwall, M. (2002c), A research and institutional size based model for national university Web site interlinking, Journal of Documentation, 58(6): 683–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thelwall, M. (2002d), The top 100 linked-to pages on UK university Web sites: High inlink counts are not usually associated with quality scholarly content, Journal of Information Science, 28(6): 483–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thelwall, M. (2003), Web use and peer interconnectivity metrics for academic Web sites, Journal of Information Science, 29: 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thelwall, M. (2004), Link Analysis: An Information Science Approach, Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thelwall, M., Harries, G. (2003), The connection between the research of a university and counts of links to its Web pages: An investigation based upon a classification of the relationships of pages to the research of the host university, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(7): 594–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thelwall, M., Harries, G. (2004), Do better scholars’ Web publications have significantly higher online impact? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(2): 149–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thelwall, M., Harries, G., Wilkinson, D. (2003), Why do Web sites from different academic subjects interlink? Journal of Information Science, 29(6): 453–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thelwall, M., Smith, A. G. (2002), A study of the interlinking between Asia-Pacific university Web sites, Scientometrics, 55(3): 363–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thelwall, M., Tang, R. (2003), Disciplinary and linguistic considerations for academic Web linking: An exploratory hyperlink mediated study with Mainland China and Taiwan, Scientometics, 58(1): 155–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thelwall, M., Tang, R., Price, L. (2003), Linguistic patterns of academic Web use in Western Europe, Scientometrics, 56(3): 417–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thelwall, M., Vaughan, L., Bjorneborn, L. (2005), Webometrics, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 39: 81–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thelwall, M., Vaughan, L., Cothey, V., Li, X., Smith, A. (2003), Which academic subjects have most online impact? A pilot study and a new classification process, Online Information Review, 27(5): 333–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, O., Willett, P. (2000), Webometric analysis of departments of librarianship and information science, Journal of Information Science, 26(6): 421–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, L. (2006), Visualizing linguistic and cultural differences using Web co-link data, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(9): 1178–1193.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, L., Kipp, M. E. I., Gao, Y. (2007), Why are Websites co-linked? The case of Canadian universities, Scientometrics, 72(1): 81–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, L., Shaw, D. (2003), Bibliographic and Web citations: What is the difference? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(14): 1313–1324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, L., Thelwall, M. (2003), Scholarly use of the Web: What are the key inducers of links to journal Web sites? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(1): 29–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, L., Thelwall, M. (2005), A modeling approach to uncover hyperlink patterns: The case of Canadian universities, Information Processing & Management, 41(2): 347–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, D., Harries, G., Thelwall, M., Price, E. (2003), Motivations for academic Web site interlinking: Evidence for the Web as a novel source of information on informal scholarly communication, Journal of Information Science, 29(1): 59–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuccala, A. (2006), Author cocitation analysis is to intellectual structure as Web colink analysis is to …? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(11): 1487–1502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Young Mee Chung.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chung, Y.M., Yu, S.Y., Kim, Y.K. et al. Characteristics and link structure of a national scholarly Web space: The case of South Korea. Scientometrics 80, 595–612 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-008-2091-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-008-2091-y

Keywords

Navigation