Skip to main content
Log in

The influence of self-citation corrections on Egghe’s g index

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The g index was introduced by Leo Egghe as an improvement of Hirsch’s index h for measuring the overall citation record of a set of articles. It better takes into account the highly skewed frequency distribution of citations than the h index. I propose to sharpen this g index by excluding the self-citations. I have worked out nine practical cases in physics and compare the h and g values with and without self-citations. As expected, the g index characterizes the data set better than the h index. The influence of the self-citations appears to be more significant for the g index than for the h index.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. E. Hirsch, An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 102 (2005) 16569–16572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. S. B. Popov, A parameter to quantify dynamics of a researcher’s scientific activity, arXiv:physics/0508113.

  3. S. Lehmann, A. D. Jackson, B. Lautrup, Measures and mismeasures of scientific quality, arXiv:physics/0512238 and Measures for measures, Nature, 444 (2006) 1003–1004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. P. D. Batista, M. G. Campiteli, O. Kinouchi, A. S. Martinez, Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests? Scientometrics, 68 (2006) 179–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. L. Egghe, Theory and practise of the g-index, Scientometrics, 69 (2006) 131–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. I. Podlubny, K. Kassayova, Towards a better list of citation superstars: compiling a multidisciplinary list of highly cited researchers, Research Evolution, 15 (2006) 154–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. L. Meho, The rise and rise of citation analysis, Physics World, 20(1) (2007) 32–36.

    Google Scholar 

  8. B. H. Jin, H-index: An evaluation indicator proposed by scientist, Science Focus, 1 (2006) 8–9.

    Google Scholar 

  9. L. Egghe, An improvement of the h-index: the g-index, ISSI Newsletter, 2 (2006) 8–9.

    Google Scholar 

  10. L. Egghe, How to improve the h-index, Scientist, 20 (2006) 14.

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. Rousseau, Simple models and the corresponding h-and g-index, Science Technology Development, to appear (2007); http://eprints.rclis.org/archive/00006153.

  12. H. L. Roediger, The h index in science: A new measure of scholarly contribution, APS Observer, 19(4) (2006).

  13. D. W. Aksnes, A macro-study of self-citation, Scientometrics, 56 (2003) 235–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. H. Snyder, S. Bonzi, Patterns of self-citation across disciplines, Journal of Information Science, 24(6) (1998) 431–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. W. Glänzel, B. Thijs, B. Schlemmer, A bibliometric approach to the role of author self-citations in scientific communication, Scientometrics, 59 (2004) 63–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. M. Schreiber, Self-citation corrections for the Hirsch index, EPL, 78 (2007) 30002: 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. C. D. Kelly, M. D. Jennions, The h index and career assessment by numbers, Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 21 (2006) 167–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. B. Cronin, L. Meho, Using the h-index to rank influential information scientists, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Techn., 57 (2006) 1275–1278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. M. Schreiber, A case study of the Hirsch index for 26 non-prominent physicists, Annalen der Physik (Leipzig), 16 (2007) 640–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. M. Schreiber, To share the fame in a fair way h m modifies h for multi-authored manuscripts, New Journal of Physics, 10 (2008) 040201: 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Schreiber.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schreiber, M. The influence of self-citation corrections on Egghe’s g index. Scientometrics 76, 187–200 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1886-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1886-6

Keywords

Navigation