Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Editorial and publication delay of papers submitted to 14 selected Food Research journals. Influence of online posting

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Publication delay, chronological distance between completion of a scientific work and distribution of its achievements as a peer reviewed paper, is a negative phenomenon in scientific information dissemination. It can be further subdivided in successive stages corresponding to the peer review process and the technical preparation of accepted manuscripts. Formal online posting in electronic versions of journals has been considered as a shortening of the process.

Objectives

To determine publication delay in a group of leading Food Research journals, as well as factors affecting this lag and also to compute the effect of formal online posting on the distribution of papers in electronic form. Secondary objective is also to study the possible effect of informal posting of papers through some repositories on the publication delay in the field.

Methods

14 Food Research journals were selected and 4836 papers published in 2004 were examined. Dates of first submission, submission of revised manuscripts, acceptation, online posting and final publication were recorded for each paper.

Analysis

Data collected were analyzed using SPSS and SigmaPlot. Parametric correlation between some variables was determined and ANOVA was performed with BMDP package for significance analysis of differences among journals.

Results

average publication delay of papers submitted to the set of selected journals is 348 ± 104 days, with European Food Research and Technology and Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry showing the shortest delays. Total delay strongly depends on the peer review process. On average, 85.75% of manuscripts are corrected prior to their acceptance by journals. Online posting of papers prior to their print publication reduces total delay in about 29%. On average, a paper is posted online 260 days after its submission to the set of journals.

Conclusions

Publication delay of papers is strongly dependent on the peer review process, which affects most of the manuscripts in the Food Research field. Advanced online publication through formal posting at the editor’s sites only slightly reduces the time between reception and final publication of papers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, S. (2003), A comparison of early publication practices in the United States and Europe. World Patent Information, 25: 117–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharjee, S., Tung, Y., Pathak, B. (2004), Author experiencies with the IS journal review process. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 13: 629–653.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, T., Dióspatonyi, I., Horvai, G. (2001), Publication lapse of journals of analytical chemistry. Magyar Kémiai Folyóirat, 107: 313–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, J., Wyatt, H. V. (1983), Delays in the literature of medical microbiology — Before and after publication. Journal of Documentation, 39: 155–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das, A., Das, P. (2006), Delay between online and offline issue of journals: A critical analysis. Library & Information Science Research, 28: 453–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dióspatonyi, I., Horvai, G., Braun, T. (2001A), The publication speed of information in bibliographic chemical databases. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences, 41: 1446–1451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dióspatonyi, I., Horvai, G., Braun, T. (2001B), Publication speed in analytical chemistry journals. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences, 41: 1452–1456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong, P., Loh, M., Mondry, A. (2006), Publication lag in biomedical journals varies due to the periodical’s publishing model. Scientometrics, 69: 271–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egghe, L. (2000), The influence of publication delays on the observed aging distribution of scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51: 158–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2002), An Assessment of the Implications for Basic Genetic Engineering Research of Failure to Publish, or Late Publication of, Papers on Subjects which Could Be Patentable as Required under Article 16(b) of Directive 98/44/EC on the Legal Protection of Biotechnological Inventions. Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and Council (Rep. No. [SEC(2002) 50]).

  • Garvey, W. D., Griffith, B. C. (1964), Scientific information exchange in psychology. Science, 146: 1655–1659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kling, R., Swygart-hobaugh, A. (2002), The Internet and the Velocity of Scholarly Journal Publishing (Rep. No. WP-02-12).

  • Luwel, M. (1998), Publication delays in the science field and their relationship to the ageing of scientific literature. Scientometrics, 41: 29–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nickerson, S. C. (2004), Journal of dairy science-2003. Journal of Dairy Science, 87: 1122–1129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novek, P. S. (2006), “Peer to Patent”: Collective Intelligence and Intellectual Property Reform. 15th revision. The Peer to Patent Project [On-line]. Available: http://peertopatent.jot.com/WikiHome

  • Pask, J. M. (1988), Publication time lags of economics and business working papers. Collection Managemet, 10: 63–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, G. W. (2006), Journal of dairy science 2005 editorial report. Journal of Dairy Science, 89: 1369–1371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roland, G. C., Kirpatrick, R. A. (1975), Time lapse between hypothesis and publication in the medical sciences. New England Journal of Medicine, 292: 1273–1276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schroter, S., Tite, L., Smith, R. (2005), Perceptions of open access publishing: interviews with journal authors. British Medical Journal, 330: 756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seglen, P. O. (1997), Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. British Medical Journal, 314: 498–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sittig, D., Kaalasittig, J. (1995), A quantitative ranking of the biomedical informatics serials. Methods of Information in Medicine, 34: 397–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, J., Shimes, R. (1997), Publication bias: evidence of delayed publication in a cohort study of clinical research projects. British Medical Journal, 315: 640–645.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strevens, M. (2003), The role of the priority rule in science. Journal of Philosophy, 100: 55–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swan, A., Brown, S. (2003), Authors and electronic publishing: what authors want from the new technology. Learned Publishing, 16: 28–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, M. J. (2004), Assessing the performance of a medical journal. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 169: 1268–1272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trivedi, P. (1993), An analysis of publication lags in econometrics. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 8: 93–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Rooyen S. (2001), The evaluation of peer-review quality. Learned Publishing, 14: 85–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wills, M., Wills, G. (1996), The ins and outs of electronic publishing. Internet Research, 6: 10–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yokote, G., Utterback, R. A. (1974), Time lapses in information dissemination: research laboratory to physician’s office. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 62: 251–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, G., Li, Y. J. (2006), A scientometric assessment of the information loss caused by the delays in publication of Chinese science journals. Journal of Information Science, 32: 78–87.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Scientific Documentation and Library Unit, Instituto de Agroquímica y Tecnología de Alimentos (IATA) Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), P.O. Box 73, 46100, Burjassot, Valencia, Spain

    Carlos B. Amat

Authors
  1. Carlos B. Amat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carlos B. Amat.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Amat, C.B. Editorial and publication delay of papers submitted to 14 selected Food Research journals. Influence of online posting. Scientometrics 74, 379–389 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1823-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1823-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation