Skip to main content
Log in

Import-export of knowledge between scientific subject categories: The iceberg hypothesis

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The capacity to attract citations from other disciplines — or knowledge export — has always been taken into account in evaluating the quality of scientific papers or journals. Some of the JCR’s (ISI’s Journal Citation Report) Subject Categories have a greater exporting character than others because they are less isolated. This influences the rank/JIF (ISI’s Journal Impact Factor) distribution of the category. While all the categories fit a negative power law fairly well, those with a greater External JIF give distributions with a more sharply defined peak and a longer tail — something like an iceberg. One also observes a major relationship between the rates of export and import of knowledge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barabási, A.-L. (2002), Linked: The New Science of Networks. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barabási, A.-L., Jeong, H., Neda, Z., Ravasz, E., Schubert, A., Vicsek, T. (2002). Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations. Physica A, 311(3–4): 590–614.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, T. A. (1985), Private acts and public objects: an investigation of citer motivations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 36(4): 223–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerrero-Bote, V., Zapico-Alonso, F., Espinosa-Calvo, M. E., Gómez-Crisóstomo, R., Moya-Anegón, F. (2006). Binary Pathfinder: An improvement to the Pathfinder Algorithm. (in press).

  • Katz, J. S. (1999), The self-similar science system. Research Policy, 28: 501–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. S. (2000), Scale independent indicators and research evaluation. Science & Public Policy, 27(1): 23–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L., Bensman, S. (2006), Classification and powerlaws: The logarithmic transformation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (in press).

  • Merton, R. K. (1968), The Matthew Effect in science. Science, 159: 56–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moya-Anegón, F., Vargas-Quesada, B., Herrero-Solana, V., Chinchilla Rodríguez, Z., Corera Álvarez, E., Muñoz Fernández, F. J. (2004), A new technique for building maps of large scientific domains based on the cocitation of classes and categories. Scientometrics, 61: 129–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moya-Anegón, F., Chinchilla Rodríguez, Z., Corera Álvarez, E., Herrero-Solana, V., Muñoz Fernández, F. J., Vargas-Quesada, B. (2005), Indicadores bibliométricos de la actividad científica española-2004. FECYT: Madrid.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pichappan, P. (1995), A dual refinement of journal self-citation measures. Scientometrics, 33(2): 13–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinski, G., Narin, F. (1976), Citation influence for journal aggregates of scientific publications: Theory, with application to the literature of physics. Information Processing and Management, 12: 297–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podlubny, I. (2005), Comparison of scientific impact expressed by the number of citations in different fields of science. Scientometrics, 64(1): 95–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pudovkin, A., Garfield, E. (2002), Algorithmic procedure for finding semantically related journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(13): 1113–1119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schvaneveldt, R. W., Dearholt, D. W., Durso, F. T. (1988), Graph theoretic foundations of Pathfinder networks. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 15(4): 337–345.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Sombatsompop, N., Markpin, T. (2005), Making an equality of ISI impact factors for different subject fields. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(7): 676–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stegmann, J., Grohmann G. (2001), Citation rates, knowledge export and international visibility of dermatology journals listed and not listed in the Journal Citation Reports. Scientometrics, 50(3): 483–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Leeuwen, T. N., Moed, H. F. (2002), Development and application of journal impact measures in the Dutch science system. Scientometrics, 53(2): 249–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Leeuwen, T. N., Visser, M. S., Moed, H. F., Nederhof, T. J., Van Raan, A. F. J. (2003), The Holy Grail of science policy: Exploring and combining bibliometric tools in search of scientific excellence. Scientometrics, 57(2): 257–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, C. S., Leydesdorff, L. (2006), Network Structure, Self-organization and the Growth of International Collaboration in Science Research Policy (in press).

  • Wormell, I. (1998), Informetric analysis of the international impact of scientific journals: How ‘international’ are the international journals? Journal of Documentation, 54(5): 584–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vicente P. Guerrero-Bote.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Guerrero-Bote, V.P., Zapico-Alonso, F., Espinosa-Calvo, M.E. et al. Import-export of knowledge between scientific subject categories: The iceberg hypothesis. Scientometrics 71, 423–441 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1682-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1682-3

Keywords

Navigation