Skip to main content
Log in

In which regions do universities patent and publish more?

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The main objective of this contribution is to test whether university patents share common determinants with university publications at regional level. We build some university production functions with 1,519 patents and 180,239 publications for the 17 Spanish autonomous regions (NUTS-2) in a time span of 14 years (1988–2001). We use econometric models to estimate their determinants. Our results suggest that there is little scope for regional policy to compensate the production of patents vs. publications through different university or joint research institutional settings. On the contrary, while patents are more reactive to expenditure on R&D, publications are more responsive to the number of researchers, so the sustained promotion of both will make it compatible for regions their joint production. However, standing out in the generation of both outputs requires costly investment in various inputs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, J. D., Z. Griliches (2000), Research productivity in a system of universities. In: Encaoua D., B. H. Hall, F. Laisney, J. Mairesse (Eds), The Economics and Econometrics of Innovation. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal, A., R. Henderson (2002), Putting patents in context: Exploring knowledge transfer from MIT. Management Science, 48(1): 44–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azagra-Caro, J., I. Fernández-de-Lucio, A. Gutiérrez-Gracia (2003), University patents: Output and input indicators... of what? Research Evaluation, 12(1): 5–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azagra-Caro, J., N. Carayol, P. Llerena (2006a), Patent production at a European research university: Exploratory evidence at the laboratory level. Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(2): 257–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azagra-Caro, J., A. Yegros-Yegros, F. Archontakis (2006b), What do university patent routes indicate at regional level? Scientometrics 66(1): 219–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldini, N., R. Grimaldi, M. Sobrero (2004), Institutional Changes and the Commercialization of Academic Knowledge: a Study of Italian Universities Patenting Activities Between 1965 and 2002, CRESCO Working Paper 11.

  • Bercovitz, J., M. Feldman (2003), Technology Transfer and the Academic Department: Who Participates and Why? DRUID Summer 2003 Conference, Copenhagen (Denmark), June 12–14.

  • Bonaccorsi, A., C. Daraio (2003), Age effects in scientific productivity: The case of the Italian National Research Council (CNR). Scientometrics, 58(1): 49–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonaccorsi, A., C. Daraio (2005), Exploring size and agglomeration effects on public research productivity. Scientometrics 63(1): 87–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breschi, S., F. Lissoni, F. Montobbio (2005), From publishing to patenting. Do productive scientists turn into academic inventors? Revue d’Économie Industrielle, 110: 75–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calderini, M., C. Franzoni, A. Vezzulli (2004), Scientific eminence, quality of research and the decision to patent in academic career. An event history analysis. Conference on Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Growth, Royal Institute of Technology Studies, Stockholm, 18–20 November.

  • Carayol, N., M. Matt (2004), Does research organization influence academic production? Laboratory evidence from a large European university. Research Policy, 33: 1081–1102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson, B., A. C. Fridh (2002), Technology transfer in the United States universities. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 12: 199–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cesaroni, F., A. Piccaluga (2002), Patenting activities of European Universities. Relevant? Growing? Useful? SPRU NPRnet Conference Rethinking Science Policy. Brighton (UK), 21–23 March.

  • Clark, B. R. (1998), Creating Entrepreneurial Universities. Guilford: IUA Press, Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, P. (1992), Regional innovation systems: Competitive regulation in new Europe. Geoforum, 23(3): 365–382.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Coupé, T. (2003), Science is golden: Academic R&D and university patents. Journal of Technology Transfer, 28: 31–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coronado Guerrero, D., M. Acosta Seró, R. Marín Muñoz (2003), La contribución de la universidad al desarrollo de la tecnología industrial. Diferencias sectoriales, regionales y factores determinantes. XXIX Reunión de estudios regionales, Santander, 27–28 de noviembre.

  • Crespi, G., A. Geuna (2005), Modelling and Measuring Scientific Production: Results for a Panel of OECD Countries. SPRU Electronic Working Paper Series, Paper No. 133.

  • Dasgupta, P., P. David (1994), Towards a new economics of science. Research Policy, 23(5): 487–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durán Romero, G., dir., (2003), Análisis y comparación de las patentes universitarias españolas como indicador de resultados del esfuerzo investigador. Madrid: Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H. (1998), The norms of entrepreneurial science: cognitive effects of the new university-industry linkages. Research Policy, 27: 823–833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H., L. Leydesdorff (2000), The dynamics of innovation: From National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of academic-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 26: 109–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feller, I. (1990), Universities as engines of R&D-based economic growth: They think they can. Research Policy, 19: 335–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández de Córdoba, S. (1996), Derecho de patentes e investigación científica. Valencia: Tirant Lo Blanch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foltz, J., B. Barham, K. Kim (2000.), Universities and agricultural biotechnology patent production. Agribusiness, 16(1): 82–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foltz, J., K. Kim, B. Barham (2001), A Dynamic Count Data Analysis of University Ag-Biotech Patents. Food Marketing Policy Center Research Report 56.

  • Geuna, A. (1999), The Economics of Knowledge Production. Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, W. H. (1994), Accounting for Excess Zeros and Sample Selection in Poisson and Negative Binomial Regression Models. Working paper EC-94-10, Stern School of Business, NYU.

  • Griliches, Z. (1979), Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth. Bell Journal of Economics, 10: 92–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, R., A. B. Jaffe, M. Trajtenberg (1998), Universities as a source of commercial technology: A detailed analysis of University Patenting, 1965–1988. Review of Economics and Statistics, 80(1): 119–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, M. (2005), Inventor-Authors: Knowledge Integrators or Weak Links? Institute of Strategy and International Business Working Paper 2005/1.

  • Meyer, M. (2006), Measuring science-technology interaction in the knowledge-driven economy. Scientometrics, 66(2): 425–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer-Krahmer, F., U. Schmoch (1998), Science-based technologies: university-industry interactions in four fields. Research Policy, 27: 835–851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mowery, D. C., B. N. Sampat (2001), University patents and patent policy debates in the USA, 1925–1980. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(3): 781–814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mowery, D. C., A. A. Ziedonis (2002), Academic patent quality before and after the Bayh-Dole act in the United States. Research Policy, 31: 399–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2002), Main Science and Technology Indicators. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okubo, Y. (1997), Bibliometric Indicators and Analysis of Research Systems: Methods and Examples. OECD: STI Working Papers 1997/1.

  • Pavitt, K. (1998), Do patents reflect the useful research output of universities? Research Evaluation, 7(2): 105–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, A. A., A. Siow (2003). Does federal research funding increase university research output? Advances in Economic Analysis & Policy, 3(1): Article 1.

  • Rodríguez-San Pedro, L. E. (2004), Las Universidades hispanas en su contexto histórico. http://www.universia.es/contenidos/universidades/historia/Universidades_historia.htm

  • Siegel, D., D. Waldman, A. Link (2003), Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the productivity of university technology transfer offices: an exploratory study. Research Policy, 32: 27–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephan, P. (1996), The economics of science. Journal of Economic Literature, 34(3): 1199–1235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thursby, J. G., S. Kemp (2002), Growth and productive efficiency of university intellectual property licensing. Research Policy, 31: 109–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie, Y., K. A. Shauman (1998), Sex differences in research productivity revisited: New evidence about an old puzzle. American Sociological Review, 63: 847–870.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joaquín M. Azagra-Caro.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Azagra-Caro, J.M., Archontakis, F. & Yegros-Yegros, A. In which regions do universities patent and publish more?. Scientometrics 70, 251–266 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-0202-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-0202-9

Keywords

Navigation