Skip to main content
Log in

The determinants of election to the Presidency of the American Economic Association: Evidence from a cohort of distinguished 1950’s economists

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Data have been collected on 55 members of the AEA Executive Committees for the years 1950–1960 (inclusive) on a variety of variables that measure the merit and non-merit characteristics of the economists. A logit is estimated in which the dependent variable is a dummy variable for whether an Executive Committee member was ever elected President of the American Economic Association (AEA). The number of publications and citations are important determinants of election. Receiving a PhD from one of the top three schools does not help and living in the South does not hurt. Economists who were older in 1956 were more likely to have eventually been elected to the AEA Presidency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Economic Association (1957), Handbook of the American Economic Association. The American Economic Review, 47(4).

  • American Economic Association (1961), Index of Economic Journals. 1, Homewood, Ill.: Richard D. Irwin, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaug, M., P. Sturges (1983), Who’s Who in Economics: A Biographical Dictionary of Major Economists, 1700–1981. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C. (1984), Black-white earnings ratios since the Civil Rights Act of 1964: The importance of labor market dropouts. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 99(1): 31–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M. (1989), Nobelity. Eastern Economic Journal, 15(4): 339–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, R., J. Heckman (1977), The government’s impact on the labor market status of black Americans: A critical review. In: F. E. Bloch, L. Hausman (Eds), Equal Rights and Industrial Relations. Madison, Wis.: Industrial Relations Research Association, pp. 235–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, S., J. R. Cole, G. A. Simon (1981), Chance and consensus in peer review. Science, 214: 881–886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crane, D. (1965), Scientists at major and minor universities: A study of productivity and recognition. American Sociological Review, 30: 699–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, A. M., Jr. (1986), What is a citation worth? The Journal of Human Resources, 21(2): 200–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, A. M., Jr., D. R. Haurin (1994), Determinants among PhD economists of membership in a professional association. Education Economics, 2(1): 13–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, A. M., Jr., D. R. Haurin (1995), Changing patterns of subfield specialization among cohorts of economists from 1927–1988. Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology, 13: 103–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, E. (chairman) (1966–present), Social Sciences Citation Index. Philadelphia: Institute for Scientific Information, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamermesh, D. S., P. Schmidt (2003), The determinants of econometric society fellows elections. Econometrica, 71(1): 399–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koren, G. (1986), A simple way to improve the chances for acceptance of your scientific papers. The New England Journal of Medicine, (Nov. 13): 1298.

  • Koren, G. (1987), Why you should typeset your papers. The Scientist, 1(6): 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manski, C. F., S. R. Lerman (1977), The estimation of choice probabilities from choice based samples. Econometrica, 45: 1977–1988.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K. (1973), The normative structure of science. Reprinted in The Sociology of Science. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulkay, M. (1980). Sociology of science in the West. Current Sociology, 28: 1–116 & 133–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, D. P., S. J. Ceci (1982), Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again. Reprinted from The Behavioral and Brain Sciences In: S. Harnad (Ed.), Peer Commentary on Peer Review: A Case Study in Scientific Quality Control. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G. J. (1986), George J. Stigler, Ch. 6 In: W. Breit, R. W. Spencer (Eds), Lives of the Laureates. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, pp. 93–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G. J., C. Friedland (1982), The pattern of citation practices in economics. Reprinted in: The Economist as Preacher and Other Essays. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 173–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of the Census (1989), Statistical Abstract of the United States: 1989. (109th edition.) Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vroman, W. (1979), Black men’s relative earnings: Are the gains illusory? Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 44(1): 83–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, H., R. K. Merton (1971), Patterns of evaluation in science: Institutionalisation (sic), structure and functions of the referee system. Minerva, 9: 66–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arthur M. Diamond Jr..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Diamond, A.M., Toth, R.J. The determinants of election to the Presidency of the American Economic Association: Evidence from a cohort of distinguished 1950’s economists. Scientometrics 73, 131–137 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-1747-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-1747-8

Keywords

Navigation