Skip to main content
Log in

The Year in Review: Economics at the Antitrust Division, 2005–2006

  • Published:
Review of Industrial Organization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper covers the activities of the Economic Analysis Group (EAG) of the Antitrust Division, U.S. Department of Justice, during 2005–2006. It describes the economic analysis undertaken by EAG in several important investigations, appellate matters, and other activities as an advocate for competition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barnett, T. O. (2006) ‘Seven Steps to Better Cartel Enforcement’, Presentation at the 11th Annual Competition Law & Policy Workshop. European Union Institute, Florence, Italy, June 2, 2006.

  • Barnett, T. O. (2004) ‘Antitrust Enforcement Priorities – A Year in Review’, Presentation at the Fall forum of the Section of Antitrust Law. American Bar Association, Washington, DC, November 19, 2004.

  • Beierlein J.G., Dunn J.W., McConnon J.C. Jr. (1981) ‘The Demand for Electricity and Natural Gas in the Northeastern United States’. Review of Economics and Statistics, 63(3):403–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, M. and J. Griffin (2005) Regional Differences in the Price-Elasticity of Demand for Energy, RAND Technical Report.

  • Bohi D.R. (1981) Analyzing Demand Behavior: A Study of Energy Elasticities. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Borenstein S., Bushnell J., Wolak F. (2002) ‘Measuring Market Inefficiencies in California’s Restructured Wholesale Electricity Market’. American Economic Review, 92(5):1376–1405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borenstein S., Bushnell J., Knittel C. (1999) ‘Market Power in Electricity Markets: Beyond Concentration Measures’. Energy Journal, 20(4):65–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Bushnell, J., E. Mansur, and C. Saravia (2004) ‘Market Structure and Competition: A Cross-market Analysis of U.S. Electricity Restructuring’, Center for the Study of Energy Working Paper No. 126.

  • Bushnell, J. (2005) ‘Oligopoly Equilibria in Electricity Contract Markets’, UCEI and Haas School of Business Working Paper.

  • Hortascu, A. and S. L. Puller (2005) ‘Understanding Strategic Bidding in Restructured Electricity Markets: A Case Study of ERCOT’, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. Working Paper.

  • Joskow P., Kahn E. (2002) ‘A Quantitative Analysis of Pricing Behavior in California’s Wholesale Electricity Market During Summer 2000: The Final Word’. Energy Journal, 23(4):1–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Lien, J. (2000) ‘Forward Contracts and the Curse of Market Power’, University of Maryland Working Paper.

  • Mansur, E. (2003) ‘Vertical Integration in Restructured Electricity Markets: Measuring Market Efficiency and Firm Conduct’, Center for the Study of Energy Markets Working Paper No. 117.

  • Rasmusen E. (2001) Games and Information: An Introduction to Game Theory. Malden, Mass., Blackwell Publishers Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss P., White M. (2005) ‘Household Electricity Demand, Revisited’. Review of Studies, 72(3):853–883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shubik M. (1984) Game Theory in the Social Sciences, Concepts and Solutions. Cambridge, MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoft S. (2002) Power System Economics: Designing Markets for Electricity. New York, Wiley-Interscience

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolak F. (2000) ‘An Empirical Analysis of the Impact of Hedge Contracts on Bidding Behavior in a Competitive Electricity Market’. International Economic Journal, 14(2):1–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolak, F. (2003) ‘Diagnosing the California Energy Crisis’ The Electricity Journal, August/September, 11–37.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ken Heyer.

Additional information

The views contained herein are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the U.S. Department of Justice.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Armington, E., Emch, E. & Heyer, K. The Year in Review: Economics at the Antitrust Division, 2005–2006. Rev Ind Organ 29, 305–326 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-006-9123-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-006-9123-7

Keywords

Navigation