Abstract
The diacritical markers that represent most of the vowels in the Arabic orthography are generally omitted from written texts. Previous research revealed that the absence of diacritics reduces reading comprehension performance even by skilled readers of Arabic. One possible explanation is that many Arabic words become ambiguous when diacritics are missing. Words of this kind are known as heterophonic homographs and are associated with at least two different pronunciations and meanings when written without diacritics. The aim of the two experiments reported in this study was to investigate whether the presence of diacritics improves the comprehension of all written words, or whether the effects are confined to heterophonic homographs. In Experiment 1, adult readers of Arabic were asked to decide whether written words had a living meaning. The materials included heterophonic homographs that had one living and one non-living meaning. Results showed that diacritics significantly increased the accuracy of semantic decisions about ambiguous words but had no effect on the accuracy of decisions about unambiguous words. Consistent results were observed in Experiment 2 where the materials comprised sentences rather than single words. Overall, the findings suggest that diacritics improve the comprehension of heterophonic homographs by facilitating access to semantic representations that would otherwise be difficult to access from print.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abu-Leil, A. K., Share, D. L., & Ibrahim, R. (2014). How does speed and accuracy in reading relate to reading comprehension in Arabic? Psicológica, 35, 251–276.
Abu-Rabia, S. (1996). The role of vowels and context in reading of highly skilled native Arabic readers. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25, 629–641.
Abu-Rabia, S. (1997). Reading in Arabic orthography: The effect of vowels and context on reading accuracy of poor and skilled native Arabic readers in reading paragraphs, sentences, and isolated words. Journal of Research in Reading, 20, 137–147.
Abu-Rabia, S. (1998). Reading Arabic texts: Effects of text type, reader type and vowelization. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10, 105–119.
Abu-Rabia, S. (1999). The effect of vowels on the reading comprehension of second- and sixth-grade native Arabic children. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28, 93–101.
Abu-Rabia, S. (2001). The role of vowels in reading Semitic scripts: Data from Arabic and Hebrew. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14, 39–59.
Abu-Rabia, S. (2002). Reading in a root-based-morphology language: The case of Arabic. Journal of Research in Reading, 25, 299–309.
Abu-Rabia, S., & Siegel, L. S. (2003). Reading skills in three orthographies: The case of Arabic–Hebrew–English-speaking Arab children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16, 611–634.
Bentin, S., & Frost, R. (1987). Processing lexical ambiguity and visual word recognition in a deep orthography. Memory and Cognition, 15, 13–23.
Bourisly, A. K., Haynes, C., Bourisly, N., & Mody, M. (2013). Neural correlates of diacritics in Arabic: An fMRI study. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 26, 195–206.
Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204–256.
Folk, J. R., & Morris, R. K. (1995). Multiple lexical codes in reading: Evidence from eye movements, naming time, and oral reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1412–1429.
Gottlob, L. R., Goldinger, S. D., Stone, G. O., & Van Orden, G. C. (1999). Reading homographs: Orthographic, phonological and semantic dynamics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 561–574.
Ibrahim, R. (2013). Reading in Arabic: New evidence for the role of vowel signs. Creative Education, 4, 248–253.
Ibrahim, R., Eviatar, Z., & Aharon-Peretz, J. (2002). The characteristics of Arabic orthography slows its processing. Neuropsychology, 16, 322–326.
Koriat, A. (1985). Lexical access for low- and high-frequency words in Hebrew. Memory and Cognition, 13, 37–44.
Plaut, D., McClelland, J., Seidenberg, M., & Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading. Psychological Review, 103, 56–115.
Saiegh-Haddad, E., & Geva, E. (2008). Morphological awareness, phonological awareness, and reading in English–Arabic bilingual children. Reading and Writing, 21, 481–504.
Saiegh-Haddad, E., & Henkin-Roitfarb, R. (2014). The structure of Arabic language and orthography. In E. Saiegh-Haddad & M. Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic Literacy: Insights and Perspectives (pp. 31–54). Dordrecht: Springer.
Taouk, M., & Coltheart, M. (2004). The cognitive processes involved in learning to read Arabic. Reading and Writing, 17, 27–57.
Vaknin-Nusbaum, V., & Miller, P. (2014). The impact of pointing on the short-term memory (STM) of heterophonic homographs. Reading and Writing, 27, 769–792.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Maroun, M., Hanley, J.R. Diacritics improve comprehension of the Arabic script by providing access to the meanings of heterophonic homographs. Read Writ 30, 319–335 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-016-9677-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-016-9677-1