Abstract
The present study examined whether sublexical morphological processing takes place during visual word-recognition in Hebrew, and whether morphological decomposition of written words depends on lexical activation of the complete word. Furthermore, it examined whether morphological processing is similar when reading Hebrew as a first language (L1) or as a second language (L2), and whether L1’s morphological background, Semitic or Indo-European, modulates morphological processing in L2 Hebrew (a Semitic language), among proficient readers. To reveal the sublexical processing of the Hebrew morphemes, the Root (R) and the Pattern (P), a lexical-decision task was conducted, in which all critical stimuli were non-word letter-strings manipulated to include or exclude real Hebrew morphemes. Different combinations of real (+) and pseudo (−) morphemes yielded four types of non-words (+R+P; +R−P; −R+P, −R−P). Three groups of proficient Hebrew readers were tested: L1 Hebrew, L1 English-L2 Hebrew, and L1 Arabic-L2 Hebrew. Results demonstrated significant differences in latency and accuracy of responses to the four morphological conditions, indicating that sublexical morphological processing occurs during visual word-recognition of morphologically structured letter-strings in Hebrew. Importantly, the activation of real Hebrew morphemes occurred in non-word stimuli, indicating that morphological processing in Hebrew is separable from lexical activation. Moreover, the same pattern of results was observed in all three L1 groups, indicating that proficient L2 readers exhibit morphological processing strategies that are tuned to the L2 morphology, regardless of their L1 background.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Four participants from the L1-English group reported that they learned to read Hebrew while they were learning to read in their native language English. However, they learned to read biblical Hebrew using the pointed writing system, which is different from the non-pointed writing system that is used for reading Modern Hebrew and was used in the current experiment. In addition, all of them reported that their reading in English is much better than their reading in Hebrew.
References
Amenta, S., & Crepaldi, D. (2012). Morphological processing as we know it: An analytical review of morphological effect in visual word identification. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 1–12.
Bar-On, A., & Ravid, D. (2011). Morphological analysis in learning to read pseudowords in Hebrew. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32, 553–581.
Bick, A. S., Goelman, G., & Frost, R. (2011). Hebrew Brain vs. English Brain: Language modulates the way it is processed. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 2280–2290.
Carreiras, M., Armstrong, B. C., Perea, M., & Frost, R. (2014). The what, when, where and how of visual word recognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18, 90–98.
Creistianson, K., Johnson, R., & Rayner, K. (2005). Letter transpositions within and across morphemes. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(6), 1327–1339.
Deutsch, A., Frost, R., Pelleg, S., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (2003). Early morphological effects in reading: Evidence from parafoveal preview benefit in Hebrew. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 10, 415–422.
Deutsch, A., Frost, R., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (2005). Morphological parafoveal preview benefit effects in reading: Evidence from Hebrew. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20, 341–371.
Dijkstra, T. (2005). Bilingual visual word recognition and lexical access. In J. F. Kroll & A. M. B. de Groot (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches (pp. 179–201). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Dipendaele, K., Dunabeitia, J. A., Morris, J., & Keuleers, E. (2011). Fast morphological effects in first and second language word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 64, 344–358.
Frost, R. (2012). Towards a universal model of reading. Behavioral and Brain Science, 35, 263–329.
Frost, R., Grainger, J., & Carreiras, M. (2008). Advances in morphological processing: An introduction. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 933–941.
Frost, R., Kugler, T., Deutsch, A., & Forster, K. I. (2005). Orthographic structure versus morphological structure: Principles of lexical organization in a given language. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 1293–1326.
Giraudo, H., & Grainger, J. (2001). Priming complex words: Evidence for supralexical representation of morphology. Psyconomic Bulletin and Review, 8, 127–131.
Jeon, E. H., & Yamashita, J. (2014). L2 reading comprehension and its correlates: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 64, 160–212.
Liang, L., & Chen, B. (2014). Processing morphologically complex words in second-language learners: The effect of proficiency. Acta Psychologica, 150, 69–79.
Longtin, C. M., Segui, J., & Halle, P. A. (2003). Morphological priming without morphological relationship. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18, 313–334.
MacWhinney, B. (2005). A unified model of language acquisition. In J. F. Kroll & A. M. B. de Groot (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches (pp. 49–67). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Marian, V., Blumenfeld, H. K., & Kaushanskaya, M. (2007). The Language Experience and Proficiency Questionnaire (LEAP-Q): Assessing language profiles in bilinguals and multilinguals. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50, 940–967.
Miller, R. T. (2011). Impact of L2 reading proficiency on L1 transfer in visual word recognition. In G. Granena, et al. (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 2010 second language research forum (Vol. 2617, pp. 78–90). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Norman, T., Degani, T., & Peleg, O. (2016). Transfer of L1 visual word recognition strategies during early stages of L2 learning: Evidence from Hebrew learners whose first language is either Semitic or Indo-European. Second Language Research, 32, 109–122.
Pasquarella, A., Chen, X., Lam, K., & Luo, Y. C. (2011). Cross-language transfer of morphological awareness in Chinese–English bilinguals. Journal of Research in Reading, 34, 23–42.
Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2003). Does jugde activate COURT? Transposed-letter similarity effects in masked associative priming. Memory and Cognition, 31, 829–841.
Rastle, K., & Davis, M. H. (2008). Morphological decomposition based on the analysis of orthography. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 942–971.
Rueckl, J. G., & Rimzhim, A. (2011). On the interaction of letter transpositions and morphemic boundaries. Language and cognitive processes, 26, 482–508.
Schiff, R., & Calif, S. (2007). Role of phonological and morphological awareness in L2 oral word reading. Language Learning, 57, 271–298.
Silva, R., & Clahsen, H. (2008). Morphologically complex words in L1 and L2 processing: Evidence from masked priming experiments in English. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11, 245–260.
Taft, M., & Forster, K. (1975). Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 638–647.
Velan, H., Deutsch, A., & Frost, R. (2013). The flexibility of letter-position flexibility: evidence from eye-movments in reading Hebrew. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39, 1143–1152.
Velan, H., & Frost, R. (2011). Words with and without internal structure: What determines the nature of orthographic and morphological processing? Cognition, 118, 141–156.
Wang, M., Koda, K., & Perfetti, C. A. (2003). Alphabetic and nonalphabetic L1 effects in English word identification: a comparison of Korean and Chinese English L2 learners. Cognition, 87, 129–149.
Acknowledgments
During the writing of this manuscript, T. D. was supported by EU-FP7 Grant CIG-322016.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Norman, T., Degani, T. & Peleg, O. Morphological processing during visual word recognition in Hebrew as a first and a second language. Read Writ 30, 69–85 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-016-9663-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-016-9663-7