Skip to main content
Log in

Morphological processing during visual word recognition in Hebrew as a first and a second language

  • Published:
Reading and Writing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study examined whether sublexical morphological processing takes place during visual word-recognition in Hebrew, and whether morphological decomposition of written words depends on lexical activation of the complete word. Furthermore, it examined whether morphological processing is similar when reading Hebrew as a first language (L1) or as a second language (L2), and whether L1’s morphological background, Semitic or Indo-European, modulates morphological processing in L2 Hebrew (a Semitic language), among proficient readers. To reveal the sublexical processing of the Hebrew morphemes, the Root (R) and the Pattern (P), a lexical-decision task was conducted, in which all critical stimuli were non-word letter-strings manipulated to include or exclude real Hebrew morphemes. Different combinations of real (+) and pseudo (−) morphemes yielded four types of non-words (+R+P; +R−P; −R+P, −R−P). Three groups of proficient Hebrew readers were tested: L1 Hebrew, L1 English-L2 Hebrew, and L1 Arabic-L2 Hebrew. Results demonstrated significant differences in latency and accuracy of responses to the four morphological conditions, indicating that sublexical morphological processing occurs during visual word-recognition of morphologically structured letter-strings in Hebrew. Importantly, the activation of real Hebrew morphemes occurred in non-word stimuli, indicating that morphological processing in Hebrew is separable from lexical activation. Moreover, the same pattern of results was observed in all three L1 groups, indicating that proficient L2 readers exhibit morphological processing strategies that are tuned to the L2 morphology, regardless of their L1 background.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Four participants from the L1-English group reported that they learned to read Hebrew while they were learning to read in their native language English. However, they learned to read biblical Hebrew using the pointed writing system, which is different from the non-pointed writing system that is used for reading Modern Hebrew and was used in the current experiment. In addition, all of them reported that their reading in English is much better than their reading in Hebrew.

References

  • Amenta, S., & Crepaldi, D. (2012). Morphological processing as we know it: An analytical review of morphological effect in visual word identification. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bar-On, A., & Ravid, D. (2011). Morphological analysis in learning to read pseudowords in Hebrew. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32, 553–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bick, A. S., Goelman, G., & Frost, R. (2011). Hebrew Brain vs. English Brain: Language modulates the way it is processed. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 2280–2290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carreiras, M., Armstrong, B. C., Perea, M., & Frost, R. (2014). The what, when, where and how of visual word recognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18, 90–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creistianson, K., Johnson, R., & Rayner, K. (2005). Letter transpositions within and across morphemes. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(6), 1327–1339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, A., Frost, R., Pelleg, S., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (2003). Early morphological effects in reading: Evidence from parafoveal preview benefit in Hebrew. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 10, 415–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, A., Frost, R., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (2005). Morphological parafoveal preview benefit effects in reading: Evidence from Hebrew. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20, 341–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dijkstra, T. (2005). Bilingual visual word recognition and lexical access. In J. F. Kroll & A. M. B. de Groot (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches (pp. 179–201). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dipendaele, K., Dunabeitia, J. A., Morris, J., & Keuleers, E. (2011). Fast morphological effects in first and second language word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 64, 344–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frost, R. (2012). Towards a universal model of reading. Behavioral and Brain Science, 35, 263–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frost, R., Grainger, J., & Carreiras, M. (2008). Advances in morphological processing: An introduction. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 933–941.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frost, R., Kugler, T., Deutsch, A., & Forster, K. I. (2005). Orthographic structure versus morphological structure: Principles of lexical organization in a given language. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 1293–1326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giraudo, H., & Grainger, J. (2001). Priming complex words: Evidence for supralexical representation of morphology. Psyconomic Bulletin and Review, 8, 127–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeon, E. H., & Yamashita, J. (2014). L2 reading comprehension and its correlates: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 64, 160–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang, L., & Chen, B. (2014). Processing morphologically complex words in second-language learners: The effect of proficiency. Acta Psychologica, 150, 69–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longtin, C. M., Segui, J., & Halle, P. A. (2003). Morphological priming without morphological relationship. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18, 313–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacWhinney, B. (2005). A unified model of language acquisition. In J. F. Kroll & A. M. B. de Groot (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches (pp. 49–67). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marian, V., Blumenfeld, H. K., & Kaushanskaya, M. (2007). The Language Experience and Proficiency Questionnaire (LEAP-Q): Assessing language profiles in bilinguals and multilinguals. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50, 940–967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. T. (2011). Impact of L2 reading proficiency on L1 transfer in visual word recognition. In G. Granena, et al. (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 2010 second language research forum (Vol. 2617, pp. 78–90). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, T., Degani, T., & Peleg, O. (2016). Transfer of L1 visual word recognition strategies during early stages of L2 learning: Evidence from Hebrew learners whose first language is either Semitic or Indo-European. Second Language Research, 32, 109–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pasquarella, A., Chen, X., Lam, K., & Luo, Y. C. (2011). Cross-language transfer of morphological awareness in Chinese–English bilinguals. Journal of Research in Reading, 34, 23–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2003). Does jugde activate COURT? Transposed-letter similarity effects in masked associative priming. Memory and Cognition, 31, 829–841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rastle, K., & Davis, M. H. (2008). Morphological decomposition based on the analysis of orthography. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 942–971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rueckl, J. G., & Rimzhim, A. (2011). On the interaction of letter transpositions and morphemic boundaries. Language and cognitive processes, 26, 482–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiff, R., & Calif, S. (2007). Role of phonological and morphological awareness in L2 oral word reading. Language Learning, 57, 271–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva, R., & Clahsen, H. (2008). Morphologically complex words in L1 and L2 processing: Evidence from masked priming experiments in English. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11, 245–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taft, M., & Forster, K. (1975). Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 638–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Velan, H., Deutsch, A., & Frost, R. (2013). The flexibility of letter-position flexibility: evidence from eye-movments in reading Hebrew. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39, 1143–1152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velan, H., & Frost, R. (2011). Words with and without internal structure: What determines the nature of orthographic and morphological processing? Cognition, 118, 141–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, M., Koda, K., & Perfetti, C. A. (2003). Alphabetic and nonalphabetic L1 effects in English word identification: a comparison of Korean and Chinese English L2 learners. Cognition, 87, 129–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

During the writing of this manuscript, T. D. was supported by EU-FP7 Grant CIG-322016.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Orna Peleg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Norman, T., Degani, T. & Peleg, O. Morphological processing during visual word recognition in Hebrew as a first and a second language. Read Writ 30, 69–85 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-016-9663-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-016-9663-7

Keywords

Navigation