Skip to main content
Log in

Discovery and social learning in non-priced environments: An Austrian view of social network theory

  • Published:
The Review of Austrian Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Our purpose here is to engage in a cross-disciplinary discussion between Austrian economics and social network theory. In particular, we ask what role social networks play in the extended order in regard to both individual discovery and whether social networks can be the source of widespread unintended cooperation among individuals unknown to one another. Although Austrians have examined the function that market prices play in generating social cooperation, such discussions tend to steer clear of non-priced environments, such as interaction within social networks. We seek to explore this gap. While we acknowledge that non-price information feedback mechanisms such as status and reputation lack the calculability so crucial to market coordination, we argue that they can nonetheless mimic other important qualities of market prices and generate widespread unintended social cooperation among people unknown to one another. After a general discussion, we apply these ideas to online philanthropic communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Although the logic of the abstract analysis can help both social network theorists and practitioners hit upon guiding principles, the evidence drawn from actual social networks suggests that learning what one’s best strategy might be is no obvious task. In his empirical analysis of corporate managers, Burt found that although some social networking strategies proved far more effective in gaining early promotion, there was no systematic selection in favor of such strategies in the aggregate. This result raises the question of what keeps people from adopting the strategy best suited to their situation. Is it that they are operating from the wrong mental construct of what their best strategy is? Or is it that they know what strategy is best, but are unwilling or unable to pursue such networks (perhaps because of personality type or strong preferences for an alternative kind of network)? Or it could be that they have selected the appropriate network given their goals; career advancement is not always the top priority.

  2. Burt correctly observes that one might want to possess more than one contact within a network so as to avoid the moral hazard problems associated with exclusive bargaining relationships. Our point is to observe further the need for redundant ties so as to address the knowledge problems exclusive relationships may present.

  3. Between 2004 and 2007, the number of microfinance organizations in the MIX network has increased from approximately 150 to 1,000 and continues to grow.

References

  • Baetjer, H. (2000). Capital as embodied knowledge: Some implications for the theory of economic growth. The Review of Austrian Economics, 13(2), 147–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barabasi, A. (2003). Linked: How everything is connected to everything else and what it means. New York: Plume.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boettke, P. J., & Prychitko, D. L. (2004). Is an independent nonprofit sector prone to failure? Toward an Austrian school interpretation of nonprofit and voluntary action. The Philanthropic Enterprise, 1(1), 1–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradach, J. L., & Eccles, R. G. (1989). Price, authority, and trust: from ideal types to plural forms. Annual Review of Sociology, 15, 97–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S. (1998). The gender of social capital. Rationality and Society, 10(1), 5–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S. (2005). Brokerage and closure: An introduction to social capital. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • CGAP (2003). CGAP Phase III Strategy 2003–2008: Building financial systems that work for the poor. World Bank, Washington, DC. http://www.cgap.org/docs/CGAP_III_Strategy.pdf.

  • Chamlee-Wright, E. (1997). The cultural foundations of economic development: Urban female entrepreneurship in Ghana. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamlee-Wright, E. (2002). Savings and accumulation strategies of urban market women in Harare, Zimbabwe. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 50(4), 979–1005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chamlee-Wright, E. (2005a). Fostering sustainable complexity in the microfinance industry: Which way forward? Economic Affairs, 25(2), 5–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chamlee-Wright, E. (2005b). Entrepreneurial response to “bottom-up” development strategies in Zimbabwe. The Review of Austrian Economics, 18(1), 5–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4(16), 386–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, B. H. (2001). Good networks and good jobs: The value of social capital to employers and employees. In N. Lin, K. Cook, & R. S. Burt (Eds.) Social capital: Theory and research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, R. H. (1989). Passions within reason: The strategic role of the emotions. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gladwell, M. (2002). The tipping point: How little things can make a big difference. New York: Back Bay Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. The American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (1983). The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Sociological Theory, 1, 201–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (1995). Getting a job: A study of contacts and careers. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (2005). The impact of social structure on economic outcomes. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(1), 33–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grief, A. (1989). Reputation and coalitions in medieval trade: Evidence on the Maghribi traders. The Journal of Economic History, 49(4), 857–882.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. (1973). Law, legislation and liberty, volume I: Rules and order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. (1978). The constitution of liberty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. (1984). Individualism and economic order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. (1988). The fatal conceit: The errors of socialism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, I. M. (1973). Competition and entrepreneurship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, I. M. (1979). Perception, opportunity and profit. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landa, J. T. (1981). A theory of the ethnically homogeneous middleman group: An institutional alternative to contract law. The Journal of Legal Studies, 10(2), 349–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, N. (1999). Social networks and status attainment. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 467–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, N., Cook, K., & Burt, R. S. (Eds.) (2001). Social capital: Theory and research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

  • Mises, L. (1949). Human action. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mises, L. (1981 [1932]) Socialism: An economic and sociological analysis. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.

  • Morduch, J. (1999). The microcredit promise. Journal of Economic Literature, 37, 1569–1614.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Driscoll, G. P., & Rizzo, M. J. (1996). The economics of time and ignorance. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podolny, J. M. (1993). A status-based model of market competition. The American Journal of Sociology, 98(4), 829–872.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, N., & Birdzell Jr., L. E. (1986). How the west grew rich: The economic transformation of the industrial world. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxenian, A. (1994). Regional advantage: culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), 99–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G. J. (1961). The economics of information. The Journal of Political Economy, 69(3), 213–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watts, D. J. (2004). Six degrees: The science of a connected age. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

We would like to thank Charles Westerberg, Virgil Storr, Robert Garnett, Paul Lewis, Christopher Coyne, Peter Leeson, and Peter Boettke for their valuable insights in the development of this paper. The usual caveat applies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emily Chamlee-Wright.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chamlee-Wright, E., Myers, J.A. Discovery and social learning in non-priced environments: An Austrian view of social network theory. Rev Austrian Econ 21, 151–166 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11138-007-0039-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11138-007-0039-8

Keywords

JEL codes

Navigation