Skip to main content
Log in

Anthropometric measures change and quality of life in elderly people: a longitudinal population-based study in Southern Brazil

  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To analyze the effects of anthropometric measures change on quality of life (QoL) in elderly, using measured anthropometric data on body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC).

Method

Population-based cohort study investigating a sample of elderly (≥60) assessed in 2009 (n = 1705) and followed up in 2013 (n = 1197). QoL was evaluated in 2013 using the CASP-19. Variables evaluated as exposure including BMI and WC in 2009 (both standardized), categories of anthropometric measures change from 2009 to 2013 (excess weight = BMI ≥ 25.0 kg/m2; large WC = top quartile), and the absolute BMI and WC change in same period. Multivariate linear regressions adjusted for possible confounding factors and mediators were used.

Results

Both BMI and WC at baseline were associated with lower QoL scores, even after adjustment for confounding variables (β BMI = −0.9; 95 % CI −1.5; −0.3 and β WC = −1.0; 95 % CI −1.7; −0.4). Additionally, QoL scores were lower among elderly with excess weight (β = −1.4; 95 % CI −2.9; 0.0) or large WC (β = −3.3; 95 % CI −5.2; −1.4) in both waves than among those whose BMI and WC were always normal, but changes in anthropometric measures did not affect QoL. The presence of chronic diseases was a partial mediator of these associations, especially for effects of BMI change. Anthropometric measures change treated as a continuous variable was not associated with QoL.

Conclusions

Having excess weight and large WC in both waves was associated with lower QoL scores in elderly, but changing the anthropometric measures did not affect this outcome. Maintaining weight and WC within normal limits during aging can help to preserve QoL.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Netuveli, G., Wiggins, R. D., Hildon, Z., Montgomery, S. M., & Blane, D. (2006). Quality of life at older ages: evidence from the English longitudinal study of aging (wave 1). Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 60(4), 357–363.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Blane, D., Netuveli, G., & Montgomery, S. M. (2008). Quality of life, health and physiological status and change at older ages. Social Science and Medicine, 66(7), 1579–1587.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dale, C. E., Bowling, A., Adamson, J., Kuper, H., Amuzu, A., Ebrahim, S., et al. (2013). Predictors of patterns of change in health-related quality of life in older women over 7 years: Evidence from a prospective cohort study. Age and Ageing, 42(3), 312–318.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. WHO. (1998). The World Health Organization quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): development and general psychometric properties. Social Science and Medicine, 46(12), 1569–1585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Koch, T. (2000). Life quality vs the ‘quality of life’: assumptions underlying prospective quality of life instruments in health care planning. Social Science and Medicine, 51(3), 419–427.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bakas, T., McLennon, S. M., Carpenter, J. S., Buelow, J. M., Otte, J. L., Hanna, K. M., et al. (2012). Systematic review of health-related quality of life models. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 10, 134.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Hyde, M., Wiggins, R. D., Higgs, P., & Blane, D. B. (2003). A measure of quality of life in early old age: the theory, development and properties of a needs satisfaction model (CASP-19). Aging and Mental Health, 7(3), 186–194.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. WHO. (1995). The World Health Organization quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): Position paper from the World Health Organization. Social Science and Medicine, 41, 1403–1409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fine, J. T., Colditz, G. A., Coakley, E. H., Moseley, G., Manson, J. E., Willet, W. C., et al. (1999). A prospective study of weight change and health-related quality of life in women. Journal of the American Medical Association, 282(22), 2136–2142.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lima, M. G., Barros, M Bd A, César, C. L. G., Goldbaum, M., Carandina, L., & Alves, M. C. G. P. (2011). Health-related behavior and quality of life among the elderly: A population-based study. Revista de Saúde Pública, 45(3), 485–493.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Léon-Muñoz, L. M., Guallar-Castillón, P., Banegas, J. R., Gutiérrez-Fisac, J. L., López-García, E., Jiménez, F. J., et al. (2005). Changes in body weight and health-related quality-of-life in the older adult population. International Journal of Obesity, 29(11), 1385–1391.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zaninotto, P., Pierce, M., Breeze, E., de Oliveira, C., & Kumari, M. (2010). BMI and waist circumference as predictors of well-being in older adults: findings from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.), 18(10), 1981–1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sonati, J. G., Modeneze, D. M., Vilarta, R., Maciel, É. S., & Boccaletto, E. M. (2011). Body weight as an indicator of fat-free mass in active elderly women. Maturitas., 68(4), 378–381.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Strandberg, T. E., Strandberg, A., Salomaa, V. V., Pitkala, K., & Miettinen, T. A. (2003). Impact of midlife weight change on mortality and quality of life in old age. Prospective cohort study. International Journal of Obesity and Related Metabolic Disorders: Journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity, 27(8), 950–954.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Del Duca, G. F., González-Chica, D. A., Santos, J Vd, Knuth, A. G., Camargo, M B Jd, & Araújo, C. L. (2012). Peso e altura autorreferidos para determinação do estado nutricional de adultos e idosos: validade e implicações em análises de dados. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 28(1), 75–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gutiérrez-Fisac, J. L., León-Muñoz, L. M., Regidor, E., Banegas, J. R., & Rodríguez-Artalejo, F. (2013). Trends in obesity and abdominal obesity in the older adult population of Spain (2000–2010). Obesity Facts, 6(1), 1–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. WHO (2011). Fact sheet N°311—Obesity and overweight. Accessed June.

  18. Gortmaker, S. L., Swinburn, B., Levy, D., Carter, R., Mabry, P. L., Finegood, D., et al. (2011). Changing the future of obesity: Science, policy, and action. The Lancet., 378(9793), 838–847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Stevens, G. A., Singh, G. M., Lu, Y., Danaei, G., Lin, J. K., Finucane, M. M., et al. (2012). National, regional, and global trends in adult overweight and obesity prevalences. Populatin Health Metrics., 10(1), 22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. IBGE. Projeção da População das Unidades da Federação por sexo e idade: 2000-2030. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística Rio de Janeiro; 2013.

  21. BRASIL. Atlas do Desenvolvimento Humano no Brasil.[Sl]: Programa das Nações Unidas, 2013. 2014.

  22. IBGE. Pesquisa nacional por amostra de domicílios: síntese de indicadores-2008: Brasil, grandes regiões e unidades da Federação. IBGE; 2009.

  23. Lima, F. M., Hyde, M., Chungkham, H. S., Correia, C., Campos, A. S., Campos, M., et al. (2014). Quality of life amongst older Brazilians: A cross-cultural validation of the CASP-19 into Brazilian-Portuguese. PloS one., 9(4), e94289.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Lohman, T. G., Roche, A. F., & Martorell, R. (1988). Anthropometric standardization reference manual. Champaign: Human Kinetics Books.

    Google Scholar 

  25. WHO. Uses and interpretation of anthropometry in the elderly for the assessment of physical status. Interim draft report of nutrition unit. Ginebra: World Health Organization, The Subcommittee on the Elderly. 1992.

  26. WHO. (2008). Waist circumference and waist–hip ratio: Report of a WHO expert consultation. Geneva: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Vianna, C. A., Linhares, R. S., Bielemann, R. M., Machado, E. C., Ganzález-Chica, D. A., Matijasevich, A. M., et al. (2013). Accuracy and adequacy of waist circumference cut-off points currently recommended in Brazilian adults. Public Health Nutrition., 17(4), 861–869.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Craig, C., Marshall, A., Sjöström, M., Bauman, A. E., Booth, M. L., Ainsworth, B. E., et al. (2003). International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ): 12-country reliability and validity. Medicine and Science in Sports & Exercise, 35, 1381–1395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Fletcher, J. (2007). What is heterogeneity and is it important? British Medical Journal, 334(7584), 94–96.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Swinburn, B. A., Sacks, G., Hall, K. D., McPherson, K., Finegood, D. T., Moodie, M. L., et al. (2011). The global obesity pandemic: Shaped by global drivers and local environments. The Lancet., 378(9793), 804–814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. WHO. (2004). Comparative quantification of health risks: global and regional burden of disease attributable to selected major risk factors (Vol. 1). Geneva: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  32. WHO. (2009). Global health risks: Mortality and burden of disease attributable to selected major risks. Geneva: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Nass, R., & Thorner, M. (2004). Life extension versus improving quality of life. Best Practice and Research Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, 18(3), 381–391.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author contributions

Ana Aparecida Tessari; Maruí Weber Corseuil Giehl; Ione Jayce Ceola Schneider; David Alejandro González-Chica: (1) Conceived and/or designed the work that led to the submission, acquired data, and/or played an important role in interpreting the results. (2) Drafted or revised the manuscript. (3) Approved the final version.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maruí Weber Corseuil Giehl.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The study was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee at the Federal University of Santa Catarina under Protocols No. 352/2008 and 526.126. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tessari, A.A., Giehl, M.W.C., Schneider, I.J.C. et al. Anthropometric measures change and quality of life in elderly people: a longitudinal population-based study in Southern Brazil. Qual Life Res 25, 3057–3066 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-016-1330-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-016-1330-6

Keywords

Navigation