Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparability of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Pediatric short form symptom measures across culture: examination between Chinese and American children with cancer

  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pediatric forms measure symptoms and function of pediatric patients experiencing chronic disease by using the same measures. Comparability is one of the most important purposes of the PROMIS initiative. This study aimed to test the factorial structures of four symptom measures (i.e., Anxiety, Depression, Fatigue, and Pain Interference) in the original English and the Chinese versions and examine the measurement invariance of the measures across two cultures.

Methods

Four PROMIS Pediatric measures were used to assess symptoms, respectively, in Chinese (n = 232) and American (n = 200) children and adolescents (8–17 years old) in treatment for cancer or in survivorship. The categorical confirmatory factor analysis (CCFA) model was used to examine factorial structures, and multigroup CCFA was applied to test measurement invariance of these measures between the Chinese and American samples.

Results

The CCFA models of the four PROMIS Pediatric symptom measures fit the data well for both the Chinese and American children and adolescents. Minor partial measurement invariance was identified. Factor means and factor variances of the four PROMIS measures were not significantly different between the two populations.

Conclusions

Our results provide evidence that the four PROMIS Pediatric symptom measures have valid factorial structures and a statistical property of measurement invariance across American and Chinese children and adolescents with cancer. This means that the items of these measures were interpreted in a conceptually similar manner by two groups. They could be readily used for meaningful cross-cultural comparisons involving pediatric oncology patients in these two countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Anxiety, Depression, and Pain all have eight items; thus, each has 32 item thresholds. Fatigue has 10 items and thus has 40 item thresholds.

References

  1. Trotti, A., Colevas, A. D., Setser, A., & Basch, E. (2007). Patient-reported outcomes and the evolution of adverse event reporting in oncology. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 25(32), 5121–5127.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Basch, E., Abernethy, A. P., Mullins, C. D., Reeve, B. B., Smith, M. L., Coons, S., et al. (2012). Recommendations for incorporating patient-reported outcomes into clinical comparative effectiveness research in adult oncology. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 30(34), 4249–4255.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration. (2009). Guidance for industry: Patient-reported outcomes measures. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM193282.pdf. Accessed October 6, 2014.

  4. Baggott, C., Dodd, M., Kennedy, C., Marina, N., & Miaskowski, C. (2009). Multiple symptoms in pediatric oncology patients: A systematic review. Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing, 26(6), 325–339.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Varni, J. W., Limbers, C., & Burwinkle, T. M. (2007). Literature review: Health-related quality of life measurement in pediatric oncology: Hearing the voices of the children. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 32(9), 1151–1163.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hockenberry, M. J., Hinds, P. S., Barrera, P., Bryant, R., Adams-McNeill, J., Hooke, C., et al. (2003). Three instruments to assess fatigue in children with cancer: The child, parent and staff perspectives. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 25(4), 319–328.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Linder, L. A. (2005). Measuring physical symptoms in children and adolescents with cancer. Cancer Nursing, 28(1), 16–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hinds, P. S., Hockenberry, M., Tong, X., Rai, S. N., Gattuso, J. S., McCarthy, K., et al. (2007). Validity and reliability of a new instrument to measure cancer-related fatigue in adolescents. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 34(6), 607–618.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Varni, J. W., Burwinkle, T. M., Katz, E. R., Meeske, K., & Dickinson, P. (2002). The PedsQL in pediatric cancer: Reliability and validity of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Generic Core Scales, Multidimensional Fatigue Scale, and Cancer Module. Cancer, 94(7), 2090–2106.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Reeve, B. B., Hays, R. D., Bjorner, J. B., Cook, K. F., Crane, P. K., Teresi, J. A., et al. (2007). Psychometric evaluation and calibration of health-related quality of life item banks: Plans for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Medical Care, 45(5 Suppl 1), S22–S31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cella, D., Yount, S., Rothrock, N., Gershon, R., Cook, K., Reeve, B., et al. (2007). The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): Progress of an NIH Roadmap cooperative group during its first two years. Medical Care, 45(5 Suppl 1), S3–S11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. DeWalt, D. A., Rothrock, N., Yount, S., & Stone, A. A. (2007). Evaluation of item candidates: The PROMIS qualitative item review. Medical Care, 45(5 Suppl 1), S12–S21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Walsh, T. R., Irwin, D. E., Meier, A., Varni, J. W., & DeWalt, D. A. (2008). The use of focus groups in the development of the PROMIS pediatrics item bank. Quality of Life Research, 17(5), 725–735.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Irwin, D. E., Varni, J. W., Yeatts, K., & DeWalt, D. A. (2009). Cognitive interviewing methodology in the development of a pediatric item bank: A patient reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) study. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 7, 3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Pilkonis, P. A., Choi, S. W., Reise, S. P., Stover, A. M., Riley, W. T., & Cella, D. (2011). Item banks for measuring emotional distress from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS(R)): Depression, anxiety, and anger. Assessment, 18(3), 263–283.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Irwin, D. E., Stucky, B. D., Thissen, D., Dewitt, E. M., Lai, J. S., Yeatts, K., et al. (2010). Sampling plan and patient characteristics of the PROMIS pediatrics large-scale survey. Quality of Life Research, 19(4), 585–594.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Irwin, D. E., Stucky, B., Langer, M. M., Thissen, D., Dewitt, E. M., Lai, J. S., et al. (2010). An item response analysis of the pediatric PROMIS anxiety and depressive symptoms scales. Quality of Life Research, 19(4), 595–607.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Varni, J. W., Stucky, B. D., Thissen, D., Dewitt, E. M., Irwin, D. E., Lai, J. S., et al. (2010). PROMIS Pediatric Pain Interference Scale: An item response theory analysis of the pediatric pain item bank. Journal of Pain, 11(11), 1109–1119.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. DeWitt, E. M., Stucky, B. D., Thissen, D., Irwin, D. E., Langer, M., Varni, J. W., et al. (2011). Construction of the eight-item patient-reported outcomes measurement information system pediatric physical function scales: Built using item response theory. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 64(7), 794–804.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Irwin, D. E., Stucky, B. D., Langer, M. M., Thissen, D., DeWitt, E. M., Lai, J. S., et al. (2012). PROMIS Pediatric Anger Scale: An item response theory analysis. Quality of Life Research, 21(4), 697–706.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hinds, P. S., Nuss, S. L., Ruccione, K. S., Withycombe, J. S., Jacobs, S., DeLuca, H., et al. (2013). PROMIS pediatric measures in pediatric oncology: Valid and clinically feasible indicators of patient-reported outcomes. Pediatric Blood & Cancer, 60(3), 402–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Menard, J. C., Hinds, P. S., Jacobs, S. S., Cranston, K., Wang, J., DeWalt, D. A., et al. (2014). Feasibility and acceptability of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Measures in children and adolescents in active cancer treatment and survivorship. Cancer Nursing, 37(1), 66–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. van de Schoot, R., Lugtig, P., & Hox, J. (2012). A checklist for testing measurement invariance. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9(4), 486–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sousa, K. H., West, S. G., Moser, S. E., Harris, J. A., & Cook, S. W. (2012). Establishing measurement invariance: English and Spanish Paediatric Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire. Nursing Research, 61(3), 171.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Van Loey, N. E., Van de Schoot, R., Gerdin, B., Faber, A. W., Sjöberg, F., & Willebrand, M. (2013). The Burn Specific Health Scale-Brief: Measurement invariant across European countries. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 74(5), 1321–1326.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Liu, Y., Hinds, P. S., Wang, J., Correia, H., Du, S., Ding, J., et al. (2013). Translation and linguistic validation of the pediatric patient-reported outcomes measurement information system measures into simplified Chinese using cognitive interviewing methodology. Cancer Nursing, 36(5), 368–376.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Liu, Y., Shen, Y., Yu, X., Qiu, Y., & Yuan, C. (2013). Analysis of known-group validity of Pediatric Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System. Nursing Journal Of Chinese PLA, 30(6), 18–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Liu, Y. (2013). Measurement examination of Chinese version of pediatric PROMIS measures among children and adolescents with cancer. Master dissertation, Second Military Medical University. http://d.g.wanfangdata.com.cn/Thesis_Y2339995.aspx. Assessed October 15, 2014.

  30. Millsap, R. E., & Tein, J.-Y. (2004). Assessing factorial invariance in ordered-categorical measures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 479–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Muthén, B. O., & Asparouhov, T. (2002). Latent variable analysis with categorical outcomes: Multi-group and growth modeling in Mplus. Mplus Web Note # 4, Los Angeles, CA. (http://www.statmodel.com/mplus/examples/webnotes/).

  32. Glöckner-Rist, A., & Hoijtink, H. (2003). The best of both worlds: Factor analysis of dichotomous data using item response theory and structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 10, 544–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Hofmans, J., Pepermans, R., & Loix, E. (2009). Measurement invariance matters: A case made for the ORTOFIN. Journal of Economic Psychology, 30(4), 667–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Muthén, B., du Toit, S. H. C., & Spisic, D. (1997). Robust inference using weighted least squares and quadratic estimating equations in latent variable modeling with categorical and continuous outcomes. Unpublished Manuscript (http://pages.gseis.ucla.edu/faculty/muthen/articles/Article_075.pdf).

  35. Muthén & Muthén. (1998–2012). Mplus User’s Guide. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.

  36. Wang, J., & Wang, X. (2012). Structural equation modeling: Applications using Mplus. New York: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  37. Muthén, B. (2010). IRT in Mplus. Mplus Web note. https://www.statmodel.com/irtanalysisshtml. Accessed May 25, 2014.

  38. Liu, Y., Wang, J., Hinds, P. S., Wang, J., Shen, N., Zhao, X., et al. (2014). The emotional distress of children with cancer in China: An item response analysis of C-Ped-PROMIS Anxiety and Depression short forms. Quality of Life Research, 24(6), 1491–1501.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Wong, M. Y. F., & Chan, S. W. C. (2006). The qualitative experience of Chinese parents with children diagnosed of cancer. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 15(6), 710–717.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Chen, L. M., Miaskowski, C., Dodd, M., & Pantilat, S. (2008). Concepts within the Chinese culture that influence the cancer pain experience. Cancer Nursing, 31(2), 103–108.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Lekes, N., Gingras, I., Philippe, F. L., Koestner, R., & Fang, J. (2010). Parental autonomy-support, intrinsic life goals, and wellbeing among adolescents in China and North America. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39(8), 858–869.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The Chinese study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project No. 71473262) and the Oncology Nursing Society (ONS) Foundation and China Scholarship Council (No. 201406580007). The America study (PROMIS®) was funded with cooperative agreements from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Common Fund Initiative (Northwestern University, PI: David Cella, PhD, U54AR057951, U01AR052177; Northwestern University, PI: Richard C. Gershon, PhD, U54AR057943; American Institutes for Research, PI: Susan (San) D. Keller, PhD, U54AR057926; State University of New York, Stony Brook, PIs: Joan E. Broderick, PhD and Arthur A. Stone, PhD, U01AR057948, U01AR052170; University of Washington, Seattle, PIs: Heidi M. Crane, MD, MPH, Paul K. Crane, MD, MPH, and Donald L. Patrick, PhD, U01AR057954; University of Washington, Seattle, PI: Dagmar Amtmann, PhD, U01AR052171; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, PI: Harry A. Guess, MD, PhD (deceased), Darren A. DeWalt, MD, MPH, U01AR052181; Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, PI: Christopher B. Forrest, MD, PhD, U01AR057956; Stanford University, PI: James F. Fries, MD, U01AR052158; Boston University, PIs: Alan Jette, PT, PhD, Stephen M. Haley, PhD (deceased), and David Scott Tulsky, PhD (University of Michigan, Ann Arbor), U01AR057929; University of California, Los Angeles, PIs: Dinesh Khanna, MD (University of Michigan, Ann Arbor) and Brennan Spiegel, MD, MSHS, U01AR057936; University of Pittsburgh, PI: Paul A. Pilkonis, PhD, U01AR052155; Georgetown University, PIs: Carol. M. Moinpour, PhD (Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle) and Arnold L. Potosky, PhD, U01AR057971; Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, PI: Esi M. Morgan DeWitt, MD, MSCE, U01AR057940; University of Maryland, Baltimore, PI: Lisa M. Shulman, MD, U01AR057967; and Duke University, PI: Kevin P. Weinfurt, PhD, U01AR052186). NIH Science Officers on this project have included Deborah Ader, PhD, Vanessa Ameen, MD (deceased), Susan Czajkowski, PhD, Basil Eldadah, MD, PhD, Lawrence Fine, MD, DrPH, Lawrence Fox, MD, PhD, Lynne Haverkos, MD, MPH, Thomas Hilton, PhD, Laura Lee Johnson, PhD, Michael Kozak, PhD, Peter Lyster, PhD, Donald Mattison, MD, Claudia Moy, PhD, Louis Quatrano, PhD, Bryce Reeve, PhD, William Riley, PhD, Peter Scheidt, MD, Ashley Wilder Smith, PhD, MPH, Susana Serrate-Sztein, MD, William Phillip Tonkins, DrPH, Ellen Werner, PhD, Tisha Wiley, PhD, and James Witter, MD, PhD. The contents of this article use data developed under PROMIS. These contents do not necessarily represent an endorsement by the US Federal Government or PROMIS. See www.nihpromis.org for additional information on the PROMIS® initiative.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Changrong Yuan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.

Ethical approval

All the studies conducted in China and USA have got the ethical approval from the hospitals and institutions. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee.

Informal consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in this study.

Appendix

Appendix

It was listed the item stems of the original English version of PROMIS Pediatric (PROMIS Pediatric SF v1.0) Anxiety and Depression, Fatigue, and Pain Interference Symptom Short Forms. All items with 7-day recall period stated as “in the past seven days,” and a 5-point responses with the options never (0), almost never (1), sometimes (2), often (3), and always (4). In the updated PROMIS Pediatric Short Forms (PROMIS Pediatric SF v1.1 versions), the item 3460R1 and 3462R1 in Anxiety and item 3477R1 in Depression were deleted and replaced by new items, and the item 3506R1 in Anger was deleted.

Original English version of PROMIS Pediatric measures

Order

PROMIS item ID

Item stem

Anxiety

 1

2220R2

I felt like something awful might happen

 2

713R1

I felt nervous

 3

227bR1

I felt scared

 4

5044R1

I felt worried

 5

3460R1

I thought about scary things

 6

3462R1

I was afraid that I would make mistakes

 7

231R1

I was worried about what could happen to me

 8

3150bR2

I worried when I went to bed at night

Depression

 1

488R1

I could not stop feeling sad

 2

461R1

I felt alone

 3

5041R1

I felt everything in my life went wrong

 4

5035R1

I felt I could not do anything right

 5

711R1

I felt lonely

 6

228R1

I felt sad

 7

712R1

I felt unhappy

 8

3477R1

I thought that my life was bad

Fatigue

 1

4239aR2

Being tired made it hard for me to keep up with my schoolwork

 2

4212R1

Being tired made it hard for me to play or go out with my friends as much as I’d like

 3

4213R1

I felt weak

 4

2876R1

I got tired easily

 5

4221R1

I had trouble finishing things because I was too tired

 6

4220R1

I had trouble starting things because I was too tired

 7

4210R2

I was so tired it was hard for me to pay attention

 8

4241R2

I was too tired to do sports or exercise

 9

4208bR2

I was too tired to do things outside

 10

4196R1

I was too tired to enjoy the things I like to do

Pain Interference

 1

1698bR1

I felt angry when I had pain

 2

2035R1

I had trouble doing schoolwork when I had pain

 3

3793R1

I had trouble sleeping when I had pain

 4

9004

It was hard for me to pay attention when I had pain

 5

2045R1

It was hard for me to run when I had pain

 6

2049R1

It was hard for me to walk one block when I had pain

 7

1703R1

It was hard to have fun when I had pain

 8

2180R1

It was hard to stay standing when I had pain

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, Y., Yuan, C., Wang, J. et al. Comparability of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Pediatric short form symptom measures across culture: examination between Chinese and American children with cancer. Qual Life Res 25, 2523–2533 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-016-1312-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-016-1312-8

Keywords

Navigation