Abstract
This study maps the General Reporting Initiative (GRI) relations for a set of global enterprises. Enterprise interrelationships are built using the Mutual Information (MI) of the data reported by enterprises. From the MI topology, we describe interrelationships among the enterprises using chord diagrams to represent the inter- and intra-connectivity between geographical regions and economic sectors globally , by continent and country. Detailed maps are presented for European and Asian regions/sectors, including the relationship between Europe and Asia’s top reporting countries. Our findings reinforce previous research regarding the role of Europe as a driver of sustainability and its influence worldwide. We also determined that Spain is a major player in Europe and that Northern Europe does not have the assumed leading role mentioned in related studies. Eastern Asia is, by far, the leader of the region, and the GRI maps demonstrate the preponderant role of China in the region and the minimal role of India. MI topology maps outline the behavior of the economic sectors, for all the studied regions. Furthermore, a measure that relates the inter- to intra-connections is presented to describe the internal an external relationships among regions/sectors.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alonso-Almeida, M.M., Llach, J., Marimon, F.: A closer look at the ‘global reporting initiative’ sustainability reporting as a tool to implement environmental and social policies: a worldwide sector analysis. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 21(6), 318–335 (2014)
Alonso-Almeida, M.M., Marimon, F., Llach, J.: The use of sustainability reporting in latin america: territorial and sectorial analysis. Estudios Gerenc. 31(135), 139–149 (2015)
Bravo, R., Matute, J., Pina, J.M.: Corporate social responsibility as a vehicle to reveal the corporate identity: a study focused on the websites of spanish financial entities. J. Bus. Ethics 107(2), 129–146 (2012)
Bury, T.: Market structure explained by pairwise interactions. Phys. A: Stat. Mech. Appl. 392(6), 1375 – 1385 (2013). ISSN 0378-4371. doi:10.1016/j.physa.2012.10.046. URL http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378437112009685
Christofi, A., Christofi, P., Sisaye, S.: Corporate sustainability: historical development and reporting practices. Manag. Res. Rev. 35(2), 157–172 (2012)
Dominguez, D.R.C., Maravall, M., Turiel, A., Ciria, J.C., Parga, N.: Numerical simulation of a binary communication channel: comparison between a replica calculation and an exact solution. EPL (Europhys. Lett.) 45(6), 739 (1999)
Drozdz, S., Grümmer, F., Górski, A.Z., Ruf, F., Speth, J.: Dynamics of competition between collectivity and noise in the stock market. Phys. A: Stat. Mech. Appl. 287(34), 440–449 (2000). ISSN 0378-4371. doi:10.1016/S0378-4371(00)00383-6. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378437100003836
Drozdz, S., Grümmer, F., Ruf, F., Speth J.: Towards identifying the world stock market cross-correlations: Dax versus dow jones. Phys. A: Stat. Mech. Appl. 294(12), 226–234 (2001). ISSN 0378-4371. doi:10.1016/S0378-4371(01)00119-4. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378437101001194
Etzion, D., Ferraro, F.: The role of analogy in the institutionalization of sustainability reporting. Organization Science 21(5), 1092–1107 (2010). ISSN 1526-5455. doi:10.1287/orsc.1090.0494
European Commission. Circular economy strategy (2017). http://ec.europa.eu/environment/circular-economy/index_en.htm
Fuente, J.A., García-Sánchez, I.M., Lozano, M.B.: The role of the board of directors in the adoption of gri guidelines for the disclosure of csr information. J. Clean. Prod. 141, 737–750 (2017)
Gafiychuk, V.V., Datsko, B.Y., Izmaylova, J.: Analysis of data clusters obtained by self-organizing methods. Phys. A: Stat. Mech. Appl. 341(0), 547 – 555 (2004). ISSN 0378-4371. doi:10.1016/j.physa.2004.04.115. URL http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378437104005473
Garcia, S., Cintra, Y., Rita de Cássia, S.R., Lima, F.G.: Corporate sustainability management: a proposed multi-criteria model to support balanced decision-making. J. Clean. Prod. 136, 181–196 (2016)
Gilbert, D.U., Rasche, A.: Discourse ethics and social accountability: the ethics of sa 8000. Bus. Ethics Q. 17(02), 187–216 (2007)
Godha, A., Jain, P.: Sustainability reporting trend in indian companies as per GRI framework: a comparative study. South Asian J. Bus. Manag. Cases 4(1), 62–73 (2015)
González, M., Alonso-Almeida, M.M., Avila, C., Dominguez, D.: Modeling sustainability report scoring sequences using an attractor network. Neurocomputing 168, 1181–1187 (2015)
Habek, P.: Evaluation of sustainability reporting practices in poland. Qual. Quant. 48(3), 1739–1752 (2014)
Habek, P., Wolniak, R.: Assessing the quality of corporate social responsibility reports: the case of reporting practices in selected european union member states. Qual. Quant. 50(1), 399–420 (2016)
Hamilton, L., Webster, P.: The International Business Environment. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2015)
Hermann, B.G., Kroeze, C., Jawjit, W.: Assessing environmental performance by combining life cycle assessment, multi-criteria analysis and environmental performance indicators. J. Clean. Prod. 15(18), 1787–1796 (2007)
Jain, A., Islam, M.A.: The rise of GRI: a social contagion epidemic. In: Proceedings of the Ninth Asia-Pacific Conference on Global Business, Economics, Finance and Banking (2016)
Jones, S., Frost, G., Loftus, J., van der Laan, S.: An empirical examination of the market returns and financial performance of entities engaged in sustainability reporting. Aust. Acc. Rev. 17(41), 78–87 (2007). ISSN 1835-2561. doi:10.1111/j.1835-2561.2007.tb00456.x
Lamberton, G.: Sustainability accountinga brief history and conceptual framework. Acc. Forum 29(1), 7 – 26 (2005). ISSN 0155-9982. doi:10.1016/j.accfor.2004.11.001. URL http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0155998204000808
Llach, J., Marimon, F., Alonso-Almeida, M.M.: Social accountability 8000 standard certification. J. Clean. Prod. 93, 288–298 (2015)
Marimon, F., del Pilar Rodríguez, M., Alejandro, K.A.C.: The worldwide diffusion of the global reporting initiative: what is the point? J. Clean. Prod. 33, 132–144 (2012)
Park, S.M.D., Isaksson, R., Steimle, U.: What does GRI-reporting tell us about corporate sustainability? TQM J. 21(2), 168–181 (2009)
Moneva, J.M., Archel, P., Correa, C.: GRI and the camouflaging of corporate unsustainability. Acc. Forum 30(2), 121–137 (2006). ISSN 0155-9982. doi:10.1016/j.accfor.2006.02.001. URL http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0155998206000159
Nam, Y., Barnett, G.A., Kim, D.: Corporate hyperlink network relationships in global corporate social responsibility system. Qual. Quant. 48(3), 1225–1242 (2014)
Noronha, C., Tou, Si, Cynthia, M.I., Guan, J.J.: Corporate social responsibility reporting in china: an overview and comparison with major trends. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 20(1), 29–42 (2013)
Perrini, F., Tencati, A.: Sustainability and stakeholder management: the need for new corporate performance evaluation and reporting systems. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 15(5), 296–308 (2006)
Prado-Lorenzo, J.M., Gallego-Alvarez, I., Garcia-Sanchez, I.M.: Stakeholder engagement and corporate social responsibility reporting: the ownership structure effect. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 16(2), 94–107 (2009)
Schaltegger, S., Burritt, R.L.: Sustainability accounting for companies: catchphrase or decision support for business leaders? J. World Bus. 45(4), 375 – 384 (2010). ISSN 1090–9516. doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2009.08.002. URL http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090951609000479
Shahi, A.M., Issac, B., Modapothala, J.R.: Intelligent corporate sustainability report scoring solution using machine learning approach to text categorization. In: Sustainable Utilization and Development in Engineering and Technology (STUDENT), 2012 IEEE Conference on, pp. 227–232 (2012). doi:10.1109/STUDENT.2012.6408409
Vigneau, L., Humphreys, M., Moon, J.: How do firms comply with international sustainability standards? processes and consequences of adopting the global reporting initiative. J. Bus. Ethics 131(2), 469–486 (2015)
Willis, A.: The role of the global reporting initiative’s sustainability reporting guidelines in the social screening of investments. J. Bus. Ethics 43, 233–237 (2003). ISSN 0167-4544. doi:10.1023/A:1022958618391
Acknowledgements
This work has been funded by UNEMI 2015CONVP01-001 research grant and DITC UDLA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
González, M., Alonso-Almeida, M.M. & Dominguez, D. Mapping global sustainability report scoring: a detailed analysis of Europe and Asia. Qual Quant 52, 1041–1055 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0502-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0502-y