Skip to main content
Log in

The co-occurrence of self-observed norm-conforming behavior, reduction of zero observations and remaining measurement quality

  • Published:
Quality & Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Norm-violating behavior is characterized by clear social norms which prescribe the non-occurrence of that behavior. From the theoretical framework of Allport it is derived that specifically norm-conformation is consistent, while violating norms is expected to be inconsistent and more circumstantial. This is in contrast to test-theoretic approaches of delinquent behavior that assume that various norm-violating responses form a consistent answer pattern that is scalable and reliable. In this study we study the inter-correlations, scalability and reliability of norm-violating responses and their relation with the reduction of zero observations. In concordance with Allport’s view it is expected that different norm-violating self-report items have limited interrelatedness and are limited in scalability and reliability in the norm-violating sub-population. The NLSY98 self-report data show that a large majority of respondents (69 %) conform systematically to all ten different norms, while only nine percent admits more than two different violations. The results show that in subsamples of norm-violating respondents, the correlations between items become closer to zero, dependent on the amount of zero reduction. Furthermore, both Loevinger’s H coefficient of scalability and scale reliability become unsatisfactorily low, when 35 % or more strict norm-conforming subjects are removed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allport, F.H.: The J-curve hypothesis of conforming behavior. J. Soc. Psychol. 5, 141–183 (1934)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allport, F.H.: Rule and custom as individual variations of behavior distributed upon a continuum of conformity. Am. J. Sociol. 44(6), 897–921 (1939)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, D.J., Curran, P.J.: Distributional assumptions of growth mixture models: Implications for overextraction of latent trajectory classes. Psychol. Methods 8(3), 338 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, A.C., Trivedi, P.K.: Regression Analysis of Count Data. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, R.V.: The distribution of deviance and exceeding the speed limit. Br. J. Criminol. 36(2), 169 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cortina, J.M.: What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. J. Appl. Psychol. 78(1), 98 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh, S., Gelfand, A.E., Zhu, K., Clark, J.S.: The k-ZIG: Flexible modeling for zero-inflated counts. Biometrics 68, 878–885 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, H., Wood, R.: Five decades of item response modelling. Br. J. Math. Stat. Psychol. 42(2), 139–167 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hindelang, M.J., Hirschi, T., Weis, J.G.: Measuring Delinquency. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  • Huizinga, D., Elliott, D.S.: Reassessing the reliability and validity of self-report delinquency measures. J. Quant. Criminol. 2(4), 293–327 (1986). doi:10.1007/BF01064258

    Google Scholar 

  • Junger-Tas, J., Marshall, I.H.: The self-report methodology in crime research. Crime Justice 291–367 (1999)

  • Lambert, D.: Zero-inflated Poisson regression, with an application to defects in manufacturing. Technometrics 34(1), 1–14 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loevinger, J.: The technic of homogeneous tests compared with some aspects of “scale analysis” and factor analysis. Psychol. Bull. 45(6), 507 (1948)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Min, Y., Agresti, A.: Random effect models for repeated measures of zero-inflated count data. Stat. Model. 5(1), 1 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, W., Pedlow, S., Krishnamurty, P., Wolter, K., Chicago, I.L.: National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1997 (NLSY97). National Opinion Research Center, Chicago, IL (2000)

  • Nagin, D.S., Land, K.C.: Age, criminal careers, and population heterogeneity: Specification and estimation of a nonparametric, mixed Poisson Model. Criminology 31(3), 327–362 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osgood, D.W., McMorris, B.J., Potenza, M.T.: Analyzing multiple-item measures of crime and deviance I: Item response theory scaling. J. Quant. Criminol. 18(3), 267–296 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perumean-Chaney, S.E., Morgan, C., McDowall, D., Aban, I.: Zero-inflated and overdispersed: What’s one to do? J. Stat. Comput. Simul. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00949655.2012.668550 (2012). Accessed 10 Jan 2013

  • Piquero, A.R., Macintosh, R., Hickman, M.: The validity of a self-reported delinquency scale: Comparisons across gender, age, race, and place of residence. Sociol. Methods Res. 30(4), 492 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raudenbush, S.W., Johnson, C., Sampson, R.J.: A multivariate, multilevel Rasch model with application to self-reported criminal behavior. Sociol. Methodol. 169–211 (2003)

  • Sijtsma, K.: On the use, the misuse, and the very limited usefulness of Cronbach’s alpha. Psychometrika 74(1), 107–120 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, E.H.: The interpretation of interaction in contingency tables. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Methodol. 13(2), 238–241 (1951)

    Google Scholar 

  • Slymen, D.J., Ayala, G.X., Arredondo, E.M., Elder, J.P.: A demonstration of modeling count data with an application to physical activity. Epidemiol. Perspect. Innov. 3(1), 3 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornberry, T.P., Krohn, M.D.: Comparison of self-report and official data for measuring crime. Measurement Problems in Criminal Justice Research, pp. 43–94. National Academies Press, Washington, DC (2003)

  • van der Ark, L.A., Croon, M.A., Sijtsma, K.: Mokken scale analysis for dichotomous items using marginal models. Psychometrika 73(2), 183–208 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johannes A. Landsheer.

Appendix

Appendix

The relationship between mean, variance, covariance and correlation with and without a proportion zero-inflation of \(\pi \).

Let there be a zero-inflated variable with \(n\) observations, a proportion zero-inflation of \(\pi \) and an underlying not inflated distribution with \(\tilde{n}\) observations, mean \(\tilde{\mu }\) and variance \(\tilde{\sigma }^{2}\).

$$\begin{aligned} \mu =\frac{1}{n}\sum y =\frac{1}{n}\sum {\tilde{y}} =\frac{\tilde{n}}{n}\tilde{\mu }=(1-\pi )\tilde{\mu } \end{aligned}$$

Derivation of formula (3)

The variance of a zero-inflated variable \(y\) with \(n\) observations and mean \(\mu \) is:

$$\begin{aligned} \sigma ^{2}&= \frac{1}{n}\sum {{y}^{2}-\mu }^{2} \\ \sigma ^{2}&= \frac{\tilde{n}}{n}\left( \frac{1}{\tilde{n}}\sum {\tilde{y}^{2}} -\frac{\tilde{n}}{n}\tilde{\mu }^{2}\right) \\ \sigma ^{2}&= \frac{\tilde{n}}{n}\left( \frac{1}{\tilde{n}}\sum {\tilde{y}^{2}} -\tilde{\mu }^{2}+\frac{n}{n}\tilde{\mu }^{2}-\frac{\tilde{n}}{n}\tilde{\mu }^{2}\right) \\ \sigma ^{2}&= (1-\pi )\left( \tilde{\sigma }^{2}+\frac{n-\tilde{n}}{n}\tilde{\mu }^{2}\right) =(1-\pi )(\tilde{\sigma }^{2}+\pi \tilde{\mu }^{2}) \end{aligned}$$

and

$$\begin{aligned} {\tilde{\sigma }^{2}} =\frac{\sigma ^{2}}{(1-\pi )}-\frac{\pi }{(1-\pi )^{2}}\tilde{\mu }^{2} \end{aligned}$$

The covariance formula can be derived in similar fashion.

$$\begin{aligned} \sigma _{xy} =(1-\pi )\tilde{\sigma }_{xy} +\pi (1-\pi )\tilde{\mu }_{x} \tilde{\mu }_{y}. \end{aligned}$$

and

$$\begin{aligned} \tilde{\sigma }_{xy} =\frac{\sigma _{xy}}{(1-\pi )}-\frac{\pi }{(1-\pi )^{2}}\tilde{\mu }_{x} \tilde{\mu }_{y}. \end{aligned}$$

The Pearson product moment correlation is

$$\begin{aligned} \tilde{\rho }_{xy} =\frac{\tilde{\sigma }_{xy}}{\tilde{\sigma }_{x} \tilde{\sigma }_{y}}. \end{aligned}$$

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Landsheer, J.A. The co-occurrence of self-observed norm-conforming behavior, reduction of zero observations and remaining measurement quality. Qual Quant 48, 2647–2656 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-013-9914-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-013-9914-5

Keywords

Navigation