Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Dynamics of partisan representation the American south, 1898–2010

  • Published:
Quality & Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study addresses institutional representation in legislative delegations through the decomposition of the southern U.S. House delegation over time. Linear first-order difference equations are calculated to show the shift from the Solid South and the disintegration of Democratic dominance. These calculations also show that the qualitative behavior of partisan control varies over time given a series of critical events, including the Dixiecrat experience, the Congressional reforms of the 1970s, and the Republican Revolution of 1994. However, I also argue that the Republican Revolution was actually predictable, given the twentieth-century experience of the southern delegation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramson P.R., Aldrich J., Rohde D.W., Flanigan W.H.: Change and Continuity in the 2000 Elections. CQ Press, Washington, DC (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Adler E.S.: Constituency characteristics and the “Guardian” model of appropriations subcommittees, 1959–1998. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 44(1), 104–114 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aistrup J.A.: The Southern Strategy Revisited. University of Kentucky Press, Lexington (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck P.A.: Partisan dealignment in the postwar south. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 71(2), 477–496 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bibby J.F., Cotter C.P., Gibson J.L., Huckshorn R.J.: Parties in state politics. In: Gray, V., Jacob, H., Vines, K.N. (eds) Politics in the American States, Little, Brown, Boston (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bickford S.: Reconfiguring pluralism: identity and institutions in the inegalitarian polity. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 43(1), 86–108 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black E.: A theory of southern factionalism. J. Polit. 45(3), 594–614 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black E.: The newest southern politics. J. Polit. 60(3), 591–612 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black E., Black M.: Politics and Society in the South. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  • Black E., Black M.: The Vital South: How Presidents are Elected. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman L., Boynton G.R.: Coalition as party in a one-party southern area: a theoretical and case analysis. Midwest J. Polit. Sci. 8(3), 277–297 (1964)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brady D., Sinclair B.: Building majorities for policy changes in the house of representatives. J. Polit. 46(4), 1033–1060 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunell T.L., Grofman B.: Explaining divided U.S. senate delegations, 1788–1996: a realignment approach. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 92(2), 391–399 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bullock C.S.: Creeping realignment in the south. In: Swansborough, R.H., Brodsky, D.M. (eds) The South’s New Politics, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, SC (1988a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullock C.S.: Regional realignment from an officeholding perspective. J. Polit. 50(3), 553–574 (1988b)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell B.A.: Change in the southern electorate. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 21(1), 37–64 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell J.E.: The presidential pulse and the 1994 midterm congressional election. J. Polit. 59(3), 830–857 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carmines E.G., Stimson J.A.: Issue Evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  • Clubb J.M., Flanigan W.H., Zingale N.H.: Partisan Realignment: Historical Patterns of Realignment. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson R.E., Robinson J.A.: Inter-party competition, economic variables, and welfare policies in the American states. J. Polit. 25(2), 265–289 (1963)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan P.: Congressional Quarterly’s Politics in America, 1990: The 101st Congress. CQ Press, Washington, DC (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan P.: Congressional Quarterly’s Politics in America, 1992: The 102nd Congress. CQ Press, Washington, DC (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan P.: Congressional Quarterly’s Politics in America, 1994: The 103rd Congress. CQ Press, Washington, DC (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan P., Lawrence C.C.: Congressional Quarterly’s Politics in America, 1996: The 104th Congress. CQ Press, Washington, DC (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan P., Lawrence C.C.: Congressional Quarterly’s Politics in America, 1998: The 105th Congress. CQ Press, Washington, DC (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan P., Nutting B.: Congressional Quarterly’s Politics in America, 2000: The 106th Congress. CQ Press, Washington, DC (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fearon J.D.: Counterfactuals and hypothesis testing in political science. World Polit. 43(2), 169–195 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiorina M.P.: Divided government in the American states: a byproduct of legislative professionalism?.   Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 88(2), 304–316 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frederickson K.: The Dixiecrat Revolt and the End of the Solid South, 1932–1968. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilovich T.D., Medvec G.H.: The experience of regret: what, when, and why. Psychol. Rev. 102(2), 379–395 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg S.: Introduction to Difference Equations: With Illustrative Examples from Economics, Psychology, and Sociology. Wiley, New York (1958)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen J.M.: Individuals, institutions, and public preferences over public finance. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 92(3), 513–531 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huckfeldt R.R., Kohfeld C.W., Likens T.W.: Dynamic Modeling: An Introduction. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson J.E., King D.C.: Public goods, private interests, and representation. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 83(4), 1143–1164 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins J.A.: Examining the robustness of ideological voting: evidence from the confederate house of representatives. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 44(4), 811–822 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Key V.O.: Southern Politics in State and Nation. Vintage Books, New York (1949)

    Google Scholar 

  • Key V.O.: American State Politics: An Introduction. Knopf, New York (1956)

    Google Scholar 

  • Key V.O.: Politics, Parties, and Pressure Groups, Fifth edn. Crowell, New York (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladd E.C.: As the realignment turns: a drama in many acts. Public Opin. 7, 2–7 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockard D.: New England State Politics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ (1959)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lublin D., Voss D.S.: Racial redistricting and realignment in southern state legislatures. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 44, 792–810 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martis K.C.: The Historical Atlas of Political Parties in the United States Congress (1789–1989). MacMillan Publishing Company, New York (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  • Midlarsky M.I.: Political stability of two-party and multiparty systems: probabilistic bases for the comparison of party systems. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 78(4), 929–951 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller W.E.: One-party politics and the voter. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 50(3), 707–725 (1956)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nutting B., Stern H.A. (ed.): Congressional Quarterly’s Politics in America, 2002: The 107th Congress. CQ Press, Washington, DC (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons M.B.: Quasi-partisan conflict in a one-party legislative system: the Florida senate, 1947–1961. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 56(3), 605–614 (1962)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson S.C.: Dimensions of voting behavior in a one-party state legislature. Public Opin. Quart. 26(2), 185–200 (1962)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson J.T.: The failure of party realignment in the south, 1937–1939. J. Polit. 27(3), 602–617 (1965)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson S.C., Caldeira G.A.: The etiology of partisan competition. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 78(3), 691–707 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrocik J.R.: Realignment: new party coalitions and the nationalization of the south. J. Polit. 49(May), 347–375 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prothro J.W., Campbell E.Q., Grigg C.M.: Two-party voting in the south: class vs. party identification. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 52(1), 131–139 (1958)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riker W.: The Theory of Political Coalitions. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohde D.W.: Parties and leaders in the postreform house. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger J.A.: A two-dimensional scheme for classifying the states according to degree of inter-party competition. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 49(4), 1120–1128 (1955)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shafer B.E., Johnston R.G.C.: The transformation of southern politics revisited: the house of representatives as a window. Br. J. Polit. Sci. 31, 601–625 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sindler A.P.: Bifactional rivalry as an alternative to two-party competition in Louisiana. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 49(3), 641–662 (1955)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sprague J.: One party dominance in legislatures. Legis. Stud. Quart. 6(2), 259–285 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sprague J.: The origin and tortuous process of one party dominance in legislatures. In: Shively, W.P. (eds) The Research Process in Political Science, F.E. Peacock Publishers, Itasca, IL (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley H.W.: Voter Mobilization and the Politics of Race: The South and Universal Suffrage, 1952–1984. Praeger, New York (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley H.W.: Southern partisan changes: dealignment, realignment or both?.   J. Polit. 50(1), 64–88 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanley H.W., Bianco W.T., Niemi R.G.: Partisanship and group support over time: a multivariate analysis. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 80(3), 969–976 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stonecash J.M., Agathangelou A.M.: Trends in the partisan composition of state legislatures: a response to Fiorina. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 91(1), 148–155 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundquist J.L.: Dynamics of the Party System: Alignment and Realignment of Political Parties in the United States, 2nd edn. Brookings Institution, Washington, DC (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tetlock P.E., Belkin A.: Counterfactual thought experiments in world politics: logical, methodological, and psychological perspectives. In: Tetlock, P.E., Belkin, A. (eds) Counterfactual Thought Experiments in World Politics: Logical, Methodologi1cal, and Psychological Perspectives, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  • Truman D.B.: The state delegations and the structure of party voting in the United States house of representatives. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 50(4), 1023–1045 (1956)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner J.: Primary elections as the alternative to party competition in “Safe” districts. J. Polit. 15(2), 197–210 (1953)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Public Administration and Policy, School of Public & International Affairs, University of Georgia, 204 Baldwin Hall, Athens, GA, 30602-1615, USA

    Andrew B. Whitford

Authors
  1. Andrew B. Whitford
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew B. Whitford.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Whitford, A.B. Dynamics of partisan representation the American south, 1898–2010. Qual Quant 47, 1531–1543 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9606-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9606-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation