Skip to main content
Log in

Linear indices in nonlinear structural equation models: best fitting proper indices and other composites

  • Research Note
  • Published:
Quality & Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The recent advent of nonlinear structural equation models with indices poses a new challenge to the measurement of scientific constructs. We discuss, exemplify and add to a family of statistical methods aimed at creating linear indices, and compare their suitability in a complex path model with linear and moderating relationships. The composites used include principal components, generalized canonical variables, partial least squares, factor extraction (‘LISREL’), and a newly developed method: best fitting proper indices. The latter involves the construction of linear combinations of indicators that maximize the fit of (non-)linear structural equations in terms of these indices; the weights as well as the loadings of the indicators are sign restricted so that each indicator contributes to as well as reflects its own index in a predefined way. We use cross-validation to evaluate the methods employed, and analyze the most general situation with a complete interaction specification using the bootstrap. The methods are exemplified using an empirical data set. An additional novel feature is the use of simulations to delineate the range of the possible parameter estimates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, T.W., Rubin, H.: Statistical inference in factor analysis. In: Proceedings of the Third Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, vol. 150 (1956)

  • Bagozzi R.: On the meaning of formative measurement and how it differs from reflective measurement: Comment on Howell, Breivik, and Wilcox (2007). Psychol. Methods 12(2), 229–237 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollen K.A.: Interpretational confounding is due to misspecification, not to type of indicator: Comment on Howell, Breivik, and Wilcox (2007). Psychol. Methods 12(2), 219–228 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollen K.A., Lennox R.: Conventional wisdom on measurement, a structural equation perspective. Psychol. Bull. 110(2), 305–314 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busemeyer J.B., Jones L.E.: Analysis of multiplicative combination rules when causal variables are measured with error. Psychol. Bull. 93(3), 549–562 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin W.W., Marcolin B.L., Newsted P.R.: A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects. Results from a monte carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adopion study. Inf. Syst. Res. 14(2), 189–217 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13(3), 319–340 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davison A.C., Hinkley D.V.: Bootstrap methods and their application. 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamantopoulos A., Winklhofer H.M.: Index construction with formative indicators: an alternative to scale development. J. Mark. Res. 38, 269–277 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dijkstra, T.K.: Latent variables in linear stochastic models: reflections on maximum likelihood and partial least squares methods. PhD thesis, Groningen, 2nd edn. Published in 1985 by Sociometric Research Foundation (1981)

  • Dijkstra, T.K.: Latent variables and indices: Herman Wold’s basic design and partial least squares. In: Vinzi, V.E., Chin, W.W., Henseler, J., Wang, H. (eds.) Handbook of Partial Least Squares: Concepts, Methods, and Applications, Computational Statistics, vol. 2. Springer, Heidelberg (2008, in print)

  • Efron B.: The Jackknife, the Bootstrap, and Other Resampling Plans. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gnanadesikan R.: Methods for Statistical Data Analysis of Multivariate Observations. 2nd edn. Wiley series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics Wiley, New York (1997)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Henseler, J., Fassott, G.: Testing moderating effects in PLS path models: An illustration of available procedures. In: Vinzi, V.E., Chin, W.W., Henseler, J., Wang, H. (eds.) Handbook of Partial Least Squares: Concepts, Methods, and Applications, Computational Statistics, vol. 2. Springer, Heidelberg (2008, in print)

  • Howell R.D., Breivik E., Wilcox J.B.: Is formative measurement really measurement? reply to Bollen (2007) and Bagozzi (2007). Psychol. Methods 12(2), 238–245 (2007a)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howell R.D., Breivik E., Wilcox J.B.: Reconsidering formative measurement. Psychol. Methods 12(2), 205–218 (2007b)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K.G.: Latent variable scores and their uses. Scientific Software International, http://www.ssicentral.com/lisrel (2000)

  • Kagan A.M., Linnik Y.V., Rao C.R.: Characterization problems in mathematical statistics. Probability and Mathematical Statistics Wiley, New York (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny D.A., Judd C.M.: Estimating the nonlinear and interactive effects of latent variables. Psychol. Bull. 96(1), 201–210 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kettenring J.R.: Canonical analysis of several sets of variables. Biometrika 58(3), 433–451 (1971)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lohmöller J.B.: Latent Variable Path Modeling with Partial Least Squares. Physica, Heidelberg (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovie A.D., Lovie P.: The flat maximum effect and linear scoring models for prediction. J. Forecast. 5(3), 159–168 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team: R: a language and environment for statistical computing. http://www.R-project.org (2007)

  • Rao C.R.: Linear Statistical Inference and Its Applications. Wiley, New York (1973)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schumacker, R.E., Marcoulides, G.A. (eds): Interaction and Nonlinear Effects in Structural Equation Modeling. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tenenhaus M., Vinzi V.E., Chatelin Y.M., Lauro C.: PLS path modeling. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 48(1), 159–205 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The MathWorks, Inc: MATLAB: the language of technical computing (2007)

  • Tukey, J.W.: Methodological comments focused on opportunities. In: Brillinger, D.R., Tukey, J.W. (eds.) The Collected Works of John W. Tukey (Reprint 1986) vol. 4, pp. 819–867. Philosophy, Wadsworth Advanced Books & Software, chap 23 (1980)

  • Wold H.O.A.: Non-linear estimation by iterative least squares procedures. In: David, F.N. (eds) Research papers in statistics, pp. 411–444. Wiley, London (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wold H.O.A.: Soft modelling: the basic design and some extensions. In: Jöreskog, K.G., Wold, H.O.A. (eds) Systems under Indirect Observation. Causality, Structure, Prediction, pp. 1–54. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1982)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Theo K. Dijkstra.

Additional information

The authors thank Wynne W. Chin and Vincenzo Esposito Vinzi for helpful comments on a previous version of this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dijkstra, T.K., Henseler, J. Linear indices in nonlinear structural equation models: best fitting proper indices and other composites. Qual Quant 45, 1505–1518 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-010-9359-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-010-9359-z

Keywords

Navigation