Skip to main content
Log in

Virginia political economy: a rational reconstruction

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recognition of a distinctive style of political economy denoted as Virginia political economy appeared early in the 1960s. It is common though not universal to identify a school of thought by the academic location of the main figures associated with the creation and propagation of a particular set of ideas. By this approach, Virginia political economy is associated with the three academic venues where James Buchanan and Gordon Tullock did most of their work. This paper takes a methodological approach to identifying Virginia political economy, which gives Virginia political economy an analytical rather than a regional identity. I do this by employing a form of rational reconstruction to articulate what I perceive to be the analytical hard core of Virginia political economy. While Buchanan and Tullock were pivotal characters in the development of Virginia political economy, that hard core is neither reducible to Buchanan and Tullock nor do they convey fully that hard core as is has arisen through scholarly interaction among many people over 50 years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barzun, J. (1975). Simple and direct. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besley, T. (2006). Principled agents? The political economy of good government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boettke, P. J. (2012). Living economics. Oakland, CA: Independent Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolsinger, E. (2001). The autonomy of the political: Carl Schmitt’s and Lenin’s political realism. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M. (1964). What should economists do? Southern Economic Journal, 30, 213–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M. (1969). Cost and choice. Chicago: Markham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M. (1975). The limits of liberty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M. (1982). Order defined in the process of its emergence. Literature of Liberty, 5, 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M. (2006). The Virginia resaissance in political economy: The 1960 s revisited. In R. Koppl (ed.), Money and markets: Essays in honor of Leland B. Yeager (London: Routledge), pp. 34-44.

  • Buchanan, J. M., & Tullock, G. (1962). The calculus of consent: Logical foundations of constitutional democracyu. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, R. (1998). The sociology of philosophies: A global theory of intellectual change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cristi, R. (1998). Carl Schmitt and authoritarian liberalism. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, J. M. (Ed.). (2006). Generative social science: Studies in agent-based computational modeling. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, J. M., & Axtell, R. (1996). Growing artificial societies: Social science from the bottom up. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eucken, W. (1990[1952]). Grundsätze der wirtschaftpolitik (6th ed.). Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer, G. (2008). Rationality for mortals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, J. (2008). Liberal Fascism. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, S. J., & Stiglitz, J. E. (1976). Information and competitive price systems. American Economic Review, 66, 246–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, S., & Stiglitz, J. E. (1980). On the impossibility of informationally efficient markets. American Economic Review, 70, 393–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J. (1992). Systems of survival. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, I. (1978). The methodology of scientific research programs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, A. P. (1944). The economics of control. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, D. M., & Peart, S. J. (2013). How the Virginia school got its name. Richmond, VA: Jepson School of Leadership Studies, University of Richmond.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nutter, G. W. (1962). The growth of industrial production in the Soviet Union. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, V. (1987). The political theory of a compound republic (2nd ed.). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, V. (1997). The meaning of Democracy and the vulnerability of societies: A response to Tocqueville’s challenge. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pareto, V. (1935). The mind and society: A treatise on general sociology, 2 vols. New York: Harcourt Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson, T., & Tabellini, G. (2000). Political economics: Explaining public policy. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prigogine, I. (1997). The end of certainty: Time, chaos, and the new laws of nature. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Read, L. (1958). I, pencil. Irvington-on-Hudson, NY: Foundation for Economic Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schelling, T. C. (1975). Micromotives and macrobehavior. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, C. (1996). [1932]). The concept of the political. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1954). A history of economic analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shackle, G. L. S. (1967). The years of high theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tocqueville, A. (1835-40 [1966]). Democracy in America, 2 vols. New Rochelle, NY: Arlington House.

  • Vining, D. R. (1984). On appraising the performance of an economic system. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Vriend, N. J. (2002). Was Hayek an ace? Southern Economic Journal, 68, 811–840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R. E. (2004). Public choice as an academic enterprise: Charlottesville, Blacksburg, and Fairfax retrospectively viewed”. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 63, 55–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R. E. (2007). Fiscal sociology and the theory of public finance. Cheltanham, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R. E. (2010). Mind, society, and human action. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R. E. (2012a). Deficits, debt, and democracy: Wrestling with tragedy on the fiscal commons. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R. E. (2012b). Choice versus interaction in public choice: Discerning the legacy of the calculus of consent. In D. R. Lee (Ed.), The origin of public choice: The legacy of James M. Buchanan and Gordon Tullock (pp. 65–79). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R. E. (2012c). Public finance without taxation: Free riding as institutional artifact. Journal of Public Finance and Public Choice, 30, 191–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weintraub, E. R. (1993). General equilibrium analysis: Studies in appraisal. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeager, L. B. (Ed.). (1962). In search of a monetary constitution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I should like to thank William Shughart and Edward Lopez for helpful suggestions on earlier versions of this paper. I should also like to thank David Levy and Sandra Peart for inviting me to present these ideas at their Summer Institute for the Preservation of the History of Economics. I should further like to thank those members of the audiences at both the Public Choice Society conference and the Summer Institute who offered helpful thoughts, even though my failure to take notes at the time makes it impossible for me to acknowledge you explicitly now.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard E. Wagner.

Additional information

Symposium on the 50th Anniversary of the PCS.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wagner, R.E. Virginia political economy: a rational reconstruction. Public Choice 163, 15–29 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-014-0193-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-014-0193-z

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation