Abstract
Recognition of a distinctive style of political economy denoted as Virginia political economy appeared early in the 1960s. It is common though not universal to identify a school of thought by the academic location of the main figures associated with the creation and propagation of a particular set of ideas. By this approach, Virginia political economy is associated with the three academic venues where James Buchanan and Gordon Tullock did most of their work. This paper takes a methodological approach to identifying Virginia political economy, which gives Virginia political economy an analytical rather than a regional identity. I do this by employing a form of rational reconstruction to articulate what I perceive to be the analytical hard core of Virginia political economy. While Buchanan and Tullock were pivotal characters in the development of Virginia political economy, that hard core is neither reducible to Buchanan and Tullock nor do they convey fully that hard core as is has arisen through scholarly interaction among many people over 50 years.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barzun, J. (1975). Simple and direct. New York: Harper & Row.
Besley, T. (2006). Principled agents? The political economy of good government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Boettke, P. J. (2012). Living economics. Oakland, CA: Independent Institute.
Bolsinger, E. (2001). The autonomy of the political: Carl Schmitt’s and Lenin’s political realism. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
Buchanan, J. M. (1964). What should economists do? Southern Economic Journal, 30, 213–222.
Buchanan, J. M. (1969). Cost and choice. Chicago: Markham.
Buchanan, J. M. (1975). The limits of liberty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Buchanan, J. M. (1982). Order defined in the process of its emergence. Literature of Liberty, 5, 5.
Buchanan, J. M. (2006). The Virginia resaissance in political economy: The 1960 s revisited. In R. Koppl (ed.), Money and markets: Essays in honor of Leland B. Yeager (London: Routledge), pp. 34-44.
Buchanan, J. M., & Tullock, G. (1962). The calculus of consent: Logical foundations of constitutional democracyu. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Collins, R. (1998). The sociology of philosophies: A global theory of intellectual change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Cristi, R. (1998). Carl Schmitt and authoritarian liberalism. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.
Epstein, J. M. (Ed.). (2006). Generative social science: Studies in agent-based computational modeling. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Epstein, J. M., & Axtell, R. (1996). Growing artificial societies: Social science from the bottom up. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Eucken, W. (1990[1952]). Grundsätze der wirtschaftpolitik (6th ed.). Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr.
Gigerenzer, G. (2008). Rationality for mortals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goldberg, J. (2008). Liberal Fascism. New York: Random House.
Grossman, S. J., & Stiglitz, J. E. (1976). Information and competitive price systems. American Economic Review, 66, 246–253.
Grossman, S., & Stiglitz, J. E. (1980). On the impossibility of informationally efficient markets. American Economic Review, 70, 393–408.
Jacobs, J. (1992). Systems of survival. New York: Random House.
Lakatos, I. (1978). The methodology of scientific research programs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lerner, A. P. (1944). The economics of control. New York: Macmillan.
Levy, D. M., & Peart, S. J. (2013). How the Virginia school got its name. Richmond, VA: Jepson School of Leadership Studies, University of Richmond.
Nutter, G. W. (1962). The growth of industrial production in the Soviet Union. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Ostrom, V. (1987). The political theory of a compound republic (2nd ed.). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Ostrom, V. (1997). The meaning of Democracy and the vulnerability of societies: A response to Tocqueville’s challenge. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Pareto, V. (1935). The mind and society: A treatise on general sociology, 2 vols. New York: Harcourt Brace.
Persson, T., & Tabellini, G. (2000). Political economics: Explaining public policy. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Prigogine, I. (1997). The end of certainty: Time, chaos, and the new laws of nature. New York: Free Press.
Read, L. (1958). I, pencil. Irvington-on-Hudson, NY: Foundation for Economic Education.
Schelling, T. C. (1975). Micromotives and macrobehavior. New York: Norton.
Schmitt, C. (1996). [1932]). The concept of the political. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1954). A history of economic analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
Shackle, G. L. S. (1967). The years of high theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tocqueville, A. (1835-40 [1966]). Democracy in America, 2 vols. New Rochelle, NY: Arlington House.
Vining, D. R. (1984). On appraising the performance of an economic system. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Vriend, N. J. (2002). Was Hayek an ace? Southern Economic Journal, 68, 811–840.
Wagner, R. E. (2004). Public choice as an academic enterprise: Charlottesville, Blacksburg, and Fairfax retrospectively viewed”. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 63, 55–74.
Wagner, R. E. (2007). Fiscal sociology and the theory of public finance. Cheltanham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Wagner, R. E. (2010). Mind, society, and human action. London: Routledge.
Wagner, R. E. (2012a). Deficits, debt, and democracy: Wrestling with tragedy on the fiscal commons. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Wagner, R. E. (2012b). Choice versus interaction in public choice: Discerning the legacy of the calculus of consent. In D. R. Lee (Ed.), The origin of public choice: The legacy of James M. Buchanan and Gordon Tullock (pp. 65–79). New York: Springer.
Wagner, R. E. (2012c). Public finance without taxation: Free riding as institutional artifact. Journal of Public Finance and Public Choice, 30, 191–202.
Weintraub, E. R. (1993). General equilibrium analysis: Studies in appraisal. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Yeager, L. B. (Ed.). (1962). In search of a monetary constitution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Acknowledgments
I should like to thank William Shughart and Edward Lopez for helpful suggestions on earlier versions of this paper. I should also like to thank David Levy and Sandra Peart for inviting me to present these ideas at their Summer Institute for the Preservation of the History of Economics. I should further like to thank those members of the audiences at both the Public Choice Society conference and the Summer Institute who offered helpful thoughts, even though my failure to take notes at the time makes it impossible for me to acknowledge you explicitly now.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Symposium on the 50th Anniversary of the PCS.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wagner, R.E. Virginia political economy: a rational reconstruction. Public Choice 163, 15–29 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-014-0193-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-014-0193-z
Keywords
- Virginia political economy
- Rational reconstruction
- Methodology of scientific research programs
- Interacting agents
- Emergent dynamics
- Liberalism vs. progressivism