Skip to main content
Log in

Performance of two low-cost GPS receivers for ground speed measurement under varying speed conditions

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
Precision Agriculture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A global positioning system (GPS) receiver is an important sensor used in modern farming, particularly in precision agriculture to determine geographic location and ground speed. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of two low-cost GPS receivers for measuring ground speed under varying speed conditions on four different dates. A rotary shaft encoder on an auxiliary wheel mounted on an agricultural tractor was used as a reference. A significant time lag between the rotary encoder speed and the GPS speed was found over a range of speeds. It was observed that the GPS speed lagged the encoder speed in both increasing and decreasing speeds. The average time lag was found to be between 3.6 and 5.2 s for Receiver 1 while Receiver 2 had a time lag from 1.7 to 2.5 s. A significant difference was found between the two receivers for increasing and decreasing speeds in terms of time lags (P < 0.05). A post correction by shifting the GPS speed increased the accuracy of the speed measurement capability of both receivers resulting in an average correlation coefficient of 0.30–0.90 for Receiver 1 and 0.65–0.98 for Receiver 2. Effect of USB-to-COM converter was also studied and it did not have a significant effect on time delay. The GPS receivers provided reliable data during constant speed operating conditions; however, caution should be exercised in varying speed conditions when using low-cost GPS receivers. Also, the companies that produce GPS-based speed sensors should supply technical specifications related to velocity estimates during acceleration and deceleration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  • Adamchuk, V. I. (2001). EC01-157 Precision agriculture: Untangling the GPS data string. University of Nebraska—Lincoln. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/extensionhist/707. Accessed 28 Jan 2016.

  • Bouvet, D., & Garcia, G. (2000). Improving the accuracy of dynamic localization systems using RTK GPS by identifying the GPS latency. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation, 3, 2525–2530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R. L., & Adsit, A. H. (1985). Microcomputer based instrumentation system to measure tractor field performance. Transactions of the ASAE, 28, 393–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czajewski, W., & Iwanowski, M. (2010). Vision-based vehicle speed measurement method. Computer Vision and Graphics Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 6374, 308–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dogan, S., Temiz, M. S., & Kulur, S. (2010). Real time speed estimation of moving vehicles from side view images from an uncalibrated video camera. Sensors, 10, 4805–4824.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fulton, J., Darr, M., Taylor, R., & Shearer, S. (2010). Proper implementation of precision agricultural technologies for conducting on-farm research. In: 10th International conference on precision agriculture, International Society of Precision Agriculture (ISPA), Monticello, IL, USA. CD-ROM.

  • Garmin, (2006). GPSMap60 map navigator owner’s manual. Olathe, KS: Garmin International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grevis-James, I. W., & Bloome, P. D. (1982). A tractor power monitor. Transactions of the ASAE, 25, 595–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keskin, M., & Say, S. M. (2006). Feasibility of low-cost GPS receivers for ground speed measurement. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 54, 36–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keskin, M., Say, S. M., & Görücü Keskin, S. (2009). Evaluation of a low-cost GPS receiver for precision agriculture use in Adana province of Turkey. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 33, 79–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khalilian, A., Hale, S. A., Hood, C. H., Garner, T. H., & Dodd, R. B. (1989). Comparison of four ground speed measurement techniques. Paper No. 89-1040. American Society of Agricultural Engineers. St. Joseph, MI, USA.

  • Koc, A. B., Koc, C., Yurtlu, Y. B., & Vatandas. M. (2006). Static and dynamic tests of a low-cost GPS receiver (in Turkish). 23rd National Mechanization Congress.Onsekiz Mart University, Canakkale, Turkey, pp. 277–282.

  • Magellan, (2002). Magellan sportrak series of GPS mapping receivers user manual. San Dimas, CA: Thales Navigation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, D. S. (2007). Hydroacoustics UPDATE: Use of GPS with ADCP’s: Baud rates and update rates. https://hydroacoustics.usgs.gov/movingboat/pdfs/HydroacousticsUpdate-GPSBaudRates.pdf. Accessed 28 Jan 2016.

  • Mullenix, D., Fulton, J., & Winstead, A. (2010). Using GPS as a source for ground speed radar inputs. Precision agriculture series timely information. Alabama Cooperative Extension System Publication, USA. September 2010, p. 2.

  • Raymond, E. S. (2011). Where’s the Latency? Performance analysis of GPSes and GPSD. www.catb.org/gpsd/performance.html. Accessed 28 Jan 2016.

  • Richardson, N. A., Lanning, R. L., Kopp, K. A., & Carnegie, E. J. (1982). True ground speed measurement techniques. Paper No. 821058, Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE), Warrendale, PA, USA, pp. 3347–3356.

  • Self, K. P. (1990). Instrumentation for determining tractor and implement performance. In F. D. Tompkins (Ed.), Instrumentation for in field measurement of agricultural tractor operating parameters and energy inputs to tractor powered implements (pp. 13–22). Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, K., Brumett, J., Ellis, C., & Hoette, G. (2001). Can a $300 GPS receiver be used for yield mapping? Paper No. 01-1154. American Society of Agricultural Engineers. St. Joseph, MI, USA.

  • Shannon, K., Ellis, C., & Hoette, G. (2002). Performance of low-cost GPS receivers for yield mapping.Paper No. 02-1151. American Society of Agricultural Engineers. St. Joseph, MI, USA.

  • Stewart, M. F. (2009). Time and position data string serial latency measurements. HASP Technical Report 2009‐01. http://laspace.lsu.edu/hasp/Documentation.php. Accessed 28 Jan 2016.

  • Summers, J. D., Batchelder, D. G., & Lambert, B. W. (1986). Second generation tractor performance monitor. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 2, 30–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tompkins, F. D., Hart, W. E., Freeland, R. S., Wilkerson, J. B., & Wilhelm, L. R. (1988). Comparison of tractor ground speed measurement techniques. Transactions of the ASAE, 31, 369–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vishwanathan, R., Weckler, P. R., Solie, J. B., & Stone, M. L. (2005). Evaluation of ground speed sensing devices under varying ground surface conditions. Paper No: 05-1087, ASABE, St. Joseph, MI, USA.

  • Zhixiong, L., Xuefeng, B., Yiguan, L., Jaingxue, C., & Yang, L. (2013). Wheel slip measurement in 4WD tractor based on LABVIEW. International Journal of Automation and Control Engineering, 2(3), 113–119.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the support of the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TÜBİTAK) and Scientific Research Projects (BAP) Office of the Mustafa Kemal University for the financial support for the study (Project no: 1004 M 0102).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muharrem Keskin.

Additional information

Disclaimer: The use of product or firm names in this paper is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Keskin, M., Sekerli, Y.E. & Kahraman, S. Performance of two low-cost GPS receivers for ground speed measurement under varying speed conditions. Precision Agric 18, 264–277 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-016-9453-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-016-9453-x

Keywords

Navigation