Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Moving between mobility cultures: what affects the travel behavior of new residents?

  • Published:
Transportation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper analyzes the complex interdependencies between residential relocation and daily travel behavior by focusing on modal change. To help explain changes in daily travel patterns after a long distance move between cities the concept of urban mobility cultures is introduced. This comprehensive approach integrates objective and subjective elements of urban mobility, such as urban form and socio-economics on the one hand, and lifestyle orientations and mode preferences on the other, within one socio-technical framework. Empirically, the study is based on a survey conducted among people who recently moved between the German cities Bremen, Hamburg and the Ruhr area. Bivariate analyses and linear multiple regression models are applied to analyze changes in car, rail-based and bicycle travel. This is done by integrating variables that account for urban mobility cultures and controlling for urban form, residential preferences and socio-demographics. A central finding of this study is, that changes in the use of the car and rail-based travel are much more dependent on local scale, such as neighborhood type and residential preferences, whereas cycling is more affected by city-wide attributes, which we addressed as mobility culture elements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aditjandra, P.T., Cao, X., Mulley, C.: Understanding neighbourhood design impact on travel behaviour: an application of structural equations model to a British metropolitan data. Transp. Res. A 46, 22–32 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • ALLBUS: German General Social Survey (Study-No. 4610) (2010). Accessed 12 Mar 2013

  • Anable, J.: `Complacent car addicts’ or `aspiring environmentalists’? Identifying travel behaviour segments using attitude theory. Transp. Policy 12, 65–78 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Axhausen, K.W.: Social networks, mobility biographies, and travel: survey challenges. Environ Plan B 35, 981–996 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Backhaus, K., Erichson, B., Pinke, W., Weiber, R.: Multivariate Analysemethoden. Eine anwendungsorientierte Einführung, 13th edn. Springer, Berlin (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagley, M.N., Mokhtarian, P.L.: The impact of residential neighborhood type on travel behavior. A structural equations modeling approach. Ann. Reg. Sci. 36, 279–297 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bamberg, S.: Is a residential relocation a good opportunity to change people’s travel behavior? Results from a theory-driven intervention study. Environ. Behav. 38, 820–840 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BBR—Federal Office for Building and Regional Planning (ed.) Innerstädtische Raumbeobachtung. Methoden und Analysen. Projektleitung und wiss. Redaktion: Sturm, G. Berichte 25. BBR, Bonn (2007)

  • BBSR—Federal Institute for Research on Building, Urban Affairs and Spatial Development: Intra-urban spatial monitoring, spatial references. Bonn, sent by email from Ms. Antje Walther at Dec 30, 2011 (2010)

  • BBSR—Federal Institute for Research on Building, Urban Affairs and Spatial Development: Proportion of relocations over more than 50 km in 2012, analysis of national migration data. Bonn, sent by email from Dr. Claus Schlömer at Dec 4, 2014 (2014)

  • Beck, U.: Risk society. Towards a new modernity. Sage, London (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  • Beige, S., Axhausen, K.W.: Interdependencies between turning points in life and long-term mobility decisions. Transportation 39, 107–128 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Best, H., Lanzendorf, M.: Division of labour and gender differences in metropolitan car use: an empirical study in Cologne, Germany. J. Transp. Geogr. 13, 109–121 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boarnet, M.G., Crane, R.: Travel by Design. The Influence of Urban Form on Travel. Oxford University Press, New York (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bothe, W., Kees, M., van Wee, B.: Measuring attitudes in research on residential self-selection and travel behavior: a review of theories and empirical research. Transp. Rev. 29, 325–357 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bratzel, S.: Conditions of success in sustainable urban transport policy—policy change in ‘relatively successful’ European cities. Transp. Rev. 19, 177–190 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burbidge, S.: Foreign living experience as a predictor of domestic travel behavior. J. Transp. Geogr. 22, 199–205 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao, X., Mokhtarian, P.L., Handy, S.L.: Do changes in neighborhood characteristics lead to changes in travel behavior? A structural equations modeling approach. Transportation 34, 535–556 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao, X., Mokhtarian, P.L., Handy, S.L.: Examining the impacts of residential self-selection on travel behaviour. A focus on empirical findings. Transp. Rev. 29, 359–395 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cervero, R.: Mixed land-uses and commuting. Evidence from the American housing survey. Transp. Res. A 30, 361–377 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cervero, R., Day, J.: Residential relocation and commuting behavior in Shanghai, China. The case for transit oriented development. Working paper, UCB-ITS-VWP-2008-4. Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Berkeley. http://www.its.berkeley.edu/publications/UCB/2008/VWP/UCB-ITS-VWP-2008-4.pdf (2008). Accessed 4 Jan 2013

  • Cervero, R., Kockelman, K.: Travel demand and the 3Ds. Density, diversity, and design. Transp. Res. D 2, 199–219 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatman, D.G.: Residential choice, the built environment, and nonwork travel: evidence using new data and methods. Environ. Plan. A 41, 1072–1089 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Church, A.H.: Estimating the effect of incentives on mail survey response rates: a meta-analysis. Public Opin. Q. 57, 62–79 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crane, R.: The influence of urban form on travel. An interpretive review. J. Plan. Lit. 15, 3–23 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell, T.: Towards a politics of mobility. Environ. Plan. D 28, 17–31 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deffner, J., Götz, K., Schubert, S., Potting, C., Stete, G., Tschann, A., Loose, W.: Schlussbericht zu dem Projekt “Nachhaltige Mobilitätskultur”. Entwicklung eines integrierten Konzepts der Planung, Kommunikation und Implementierung einer nachhaltigen, multioptionalen Mobilitätskultur. Projekt 70.0749/04(FOPS) BMVBS Referat A 32. ISOE, Frankfurt am Main (2006)

  • Der Spiegel: Der Straßenkampf. Rüpel-Republik Deutschland. Spiegel 37, 66–75 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vos, J., Derudder, B., Van Acker, V., Witlox, F.: Reducing car use: changing attitudes or relocating? The influence of residential dissonance on travel behavior. J. Transp. Geogr. 22, 1–9 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EPOMM: TEMS – The EPOMM Modal Split Tool. Available at http://www.epomm.eu/tems/about_tems.phtml (2014). Accessed 27 Dec 2014

  • Ewing, R., Cervero, R.: Travel and the built environment. A synthesis. Transp. Res. Rec. 1780, 87–112 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewing, R., Cervero, R.: Travel and the built environment. A meta-analysis. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 76, 265–294 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fehrs and Peers Associates: Metropolitan Transportation Commission Bay Area Trip Rate Survey Analysis. Metropolitan Transportation Commission, Oakland (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, L., Pivo, G.: Impacts of mixed use and density on utilization of three modes of travel: single occupant vehicles, transit, and walking. Transp. Res. Rec. 1466, 44–52 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  • Freudendal-Pedersen, M.: Mobility in Daily Life. Between Freedom and Unfreedom. Ashgate, Burlington (2012)

  • Friedman, B., Gordon, S.P., Peers, J.B.: The effect of neo-traditional neighborhood design on travel characteristics. Transp. Res. Rec. 1400, 63–70 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujii, S., Gärling, T.: Application of attitude theory for improved predictive accuracy of stated preference methods in travel demand analysis. Transp Res. A 37, 389–402 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gatersleben, B.: Affective and symbolic aspects of car use: a review. In: Gärling, T., Steg, L. (eds.) Threats to the Quality of Urban Life from Car Traffic: Problems, Causes, and Solutions, pp. 219–234. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A.: The Consequences of Modernity. Stanford University Press, Stanford (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  • Goetzke, F., Rave, T.: Bicycle use in Germany: explaining differences between municipalities with social network effects. Urban Stud. 48, 427–437 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Götz, K., Deffner, J.: Eine neue Mobilitätskultur in der Stadt - praktische Schritte zur Veränderung. In: Bundesministerium für Verkehr, Bau u. Stadtentwicklung (ed.) Urbane Mobilität. Verkehrsforschung des Bundes für die kommunale Praxis, pp. 39–52. NW-Verlag, Bremerhaven (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Götz, K., Ohnmacht, T.: Research on mobility and lifestyle—what are the results? In: Grieco, M., Urry, J. (eds.) Mobilities. New Perspectives on Transport and Society, pp. 91–108. Ashgate, Farnham (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimsrud, M., El-Geneidy: Transit to eternal youth: lifecycle and generational trends in Greater Montreal public transport mode share. Transportation 41, 1–19 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haefeli, U.: Public transport in Bielefeld (Germany) and Berne (Switzerland) since 1950: a comparative analysis of efficiency, effectiveness and political background. Eur. J. Transp. Infrastruct. Res. 5, 219–238 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hägerstrand, T.: What about people in regional science? Pap. Region. Sci. Assoc. 24, 7–21 (1970)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handy, S.L., Cao, X., Mokhtarian, P.L.: Correlation or causality between the built environment and travel behavior? Evidence from Northern California. Transp. Res. D 10, 427–444 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, A.F., Cai, L.: Using heteroscedasticity-consistent standard error estimators in OLS regression: an introduction and software implementation. Behav. Res. Methods 39, 709–722 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hearst, M.O., Sirard, J.R., Forsyth, A., Parker, E.D., Klein, E.G., Green, C.G., Lytle, L.A.: The relationship of area-level sociodemographic charcteristics, household composition and individual-level socioeconomic status on walking behavior among adults. Transp. Res. A 50, 149–157 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollingworth, B.J., Miller, E.J.: Retrospective interviewing and its application in study of residential mobility. Transp. Res. Rec. 1551, 74–81 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holz-Rau, C., Kutter, E.: Verkehrsvermeidung: Siedlungsstrukturelle und organisatorische Konzepte, Materialien zur Raumentwicklung, 73. Bundesforschungsanstalt für Landeskunde und Raumordnung, Bonn (1995)

  • Hunecke, M., Haustein, S., Grischkat, S., Böhler, S.: Psychological, sociodemographic, and infrastructural factors as determinants of ecological impact caused by mobility behavior. J. Environ. Psychol. 27, 277–292 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunecke, M., Haustein, S., Böhler, S., Grischkat, S.: Attitude-based target groups to reduce the ecological impact of daily mobility behavior. Environ. Behav. 42, 3–43 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Infas, D.L.R.: National tranportation surveys—activities in Germany. Paper presented at the annual meeting 2012 of Transportation Research Board, Washington DC (2010)

  • Jensen, O.B.: Flows of meaning, cultures of movements—urban mobility as meaningful everyday life practice. Mobilities 4, 139–158 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khattak, A.J., Rodriguez, D.: Travel behavior in neo-traditional neighborhood developments. A case study in USA. Transp. Res. A 39, 481–500 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Klinger, T., Kenworthy, J.R., Lanzendorf, M.: Dimensions of urban mobility cultures—A comparison of German cities. J. Transp. Geogr. 31, 18–29 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klinger, T., Lanzendorf, M.: Built environment or attitudes: what affects the travel behavior of new residents? Paper presented at the 13th international conference on travel behaviour research (IATBR), Toronto, 15–20 July 2012

  • Krizek, K.J.: Pretest-posttest strategy for researching neighborhood-scale urban form and travel behavior. Transp. Res. Rec. 1722, 48–55 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krizek, K.J.: Residential relocation and changes in urban travel. Does neighborhood-scale urban form matter? J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 69, 265–281 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanzendorf, M.: Mobility styles and travel behavior. Application of a lifestyle approach to leisure travel. Transp. Res. Rec. 1807, 163–173 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanzendorf, M.: Mobility biographies. A new perspective for understanding travel behaviour. Paper presented at the 10th international conference on travel behaviour research (IATBR), Lucerne, 10–15 August 2003. http://www.ivt.ethz.ch/news/archive/20030810_IATBR/lanzendorf.pdf (2003). Accessed 15 June 2012

  • Lanzendorf, M., Busch-Geertsema, A.: The cycling boom in large German cities—empirical evidence for successful cycling campaigns. Transp. Policy 36, 26–33 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y., Hickman, M., Wahington, S.: Household type and structure, time-use pattern, and trip-chaining behavior. Transp. Res. A 41, 1004–1020 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mau, P., Eyzaguirre, J., Jaccard, M., Collins-Dodd, C., Tiedemann, K.: The “neighbor effect”. Simulating dynamics in consumer preferences for new vehicle technologies. Ecol. Econ. 68, 504–516 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, J.G., White, H.: Some heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimators with improved finite sample properties. J. Econ. 29, 305–325 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNally, M.G., Kulkarni, A.: An assessment of the land use transportation system and travel behavior. Paper presented at the 76th annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington DC (1997)

  • Mendenhall, W., Sincich, T.: A Second Course in Statistics. Regression Analysis, 7th edn. Prentice Hall, Boston (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • Næss, P.: Urban Form and Energy Use for Transport. A Nordic Experience. NIBR, Oslo (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  • Næss, P.: Residential self-selection and appropriate control variables in land use: travel studies. Transp. Rev. 29, 293–324 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Næss, P.: ‘New urbanism’ or metropolitan-level centralization? A comparison of the influences of metropolitan-level and neighborhood-level urban form characteristics on travel behavior. J. Transp. Land Use 4, 25–44 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, P., Kenworthy, J.R.: Gasoline consumption and cities. The institutional problems: a comparison of U.S. cities with a global survey. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 55, 24–37 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, P., Kenworthy, J.R.: Sustainability and Cities. Overcoming Automobile Dependence. Island Press, Washington DC (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortúzar J.D., Willumsen, L.G.: Modelling Transport, 4th edn. Wiley, Chichester (2011)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Prillwitz, J., Barr, S.: Moving towards sustainability? Mobility styles, attitudes and individual travel behaviour. J. Transp. Geogr. 19, 1590–1600 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prillwitz, J., Harms, S., Lanzendorf, M.: Interactions between residential relocations, life course events and daily commute distances. Transp. Res. Rec. 2021, 64–69 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pronello, C., Camusso, C.: Travellers’ profiles definition using statistical multivariate analysis of attitudinal variables. J. Transp. Geogr. 19, 1294–1308 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rammler, S.: The Wahlverwandtschaft of modernity and mobility. In: Canzler, W., Kaufmann, V., Kesselring, S. (eds.) Tracing Mobilities. Towards a Cosmopolitan Perspective, pp. 57–76. Ashgate, Abingdon (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Salomon, I., Ben-Akiva, M.: The use of the life-style concept in travel demand models. Environ. Plan. A 15, 623–638 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheiner, J.: Housing mobility and travel behaviour. A process-oriented approach to spatial mobility. J. Transp. Geogr. 14, 287–298 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheiner, J.: Mobility biographies: elements of a biographical theory of travel demand. Erdkunde 61, 161–173 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheiner, J., Holz-Rau, C.: Travel mode choice affected by objective or subjective determinants? Transportation 34, 487–511 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheiner, J., Holz-Rau, C.: Gendered travel mode choice: a focus on car deficient households. J. Transp. Geogr. 24, 250–261 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheiner, J., Holz-Rau, C.: Changes in travel mode use after residential relocation: a contribution to mobility biographies. Transportation 40, 431–458 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schönfelder, S., Axhausen, K.W.: Urban Rhythms and Travel Behaviour. Spatial and Temporal Phenomena of Daily Travel. Ashgate, Farnham (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwanen, T., Mokhtarian, P.L.: What affects commute mode choice neighborhood physical structure or preferences toward neighborhoods? J. Transp. Geogr. 13, 83–99 (2005a)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwanen, T., Mokhtarian, P.L.: What if you live in the wrong neighborhood? The impact of residential neighborhood type dissonance on distance traveled. Transp. Res. D 10, 127–151 (2005b)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheller, M., Urry, J.: The new mobilities paradigm. Environ. Plan. A 38, 207–226 (2006)

  • Stanbridge, K., Lyons, G., Farthing, S.: Travel behaviour change and residential relocation. Paper presented at the 3rd international conference of traffic and transport psychology, Nottingham, 5–9 Sept 2004

  • Steg, L.: Car use lust and must. Instrumental, symbolic and affective motives for car use. Transp. Res. A 39, 151–169 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, J.: Contrasts in reform: how the cain and burke years shaped public transport in Melbourne and Perth. Urban Policy Res. 27, 419–434 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B.G., Fidell, L.S.: Using Multivariate Statistics, 5th edn. Pearson, Boston (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Terwey, M.: ALLBUS: a German general social survey. Schmollers Jahrbuch 120, 151–158. http://ratswd.org/download/schmollers/Terwey.pdf (2000). Accessed 15 June 2012

  • Van Acker, V., Derudder, B., Witlox, F.: Assessing objective and subjective spatial influences of modal choice. In: Proceedings of European Transport Conference, Glasgow (2010)

  • Van Wee, B.: Land use and transport: research and policy challenges. J. Transp. Geogr. 10, 259–271 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verhoeven, M., Arentze, T., Timmermans, H., Van der Waerden, P.: Modeling the impact of key events on long-term transport mode choice decisions: decision network approach using event history data. Transp. Res. Rec. 1926, 106–114 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vigar, G.: The Politics of Mobility. Transport, the Environment and Public Policy. Spon Press, London (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wegener, M., Fürst, F.: Land-Use Transport Interaction: State of the Art. Berichte aus dem Institut für Raumplanung 46. Project Transland. Integration of Transport and Land Use Planning. Work Package 2, Delivery D2a, Dortmund. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1434678 (1999). Accessed 4 Jan 2013

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research has been made possible by a grant of the Rhein-Main-Verkehrsverbund (RMV) and the Integriertes Verkehrs- und Mobilitätsmanagement Rhein-Main (ivm), the founders of the professorship for mobility research at Goethe University Frankfurt. The authors are grateful to Gabrielle Hermann, Veit Bachmann as well as the editor and three anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on a previous version of the paper. They also thank Elke Alban for the figures in this article. Earlier versions of this paper have been presented at IATBR 2012 in Toronto (Klinger and Lanzendorf 2012), the Forschungskolloquium at Technische Universität Dortmund 2012 and the German Geographers Meeting 2013 in Passau. The authors thank the participants of the sessions for their constructive feedback.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Human Geography, Goethe-University Frankfurt/Main, Theodor-W.-Adorno-Platz 6, PEG-Gebäude, 60323, Frankfurt, Germany

    Thomas Klinger & Martin Lanzendorf

Authors
  1. Thomas Klinger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Martin Lanzendorf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Klinger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Klinger, T., Lanzendorf, M. Moving between mobility cultures: what affects the travel behavior of new residents?. Transportation 43, 243–271 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-014-9574-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-014-9574-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation