Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Commuting trips within tours: how is commuting related to land use?

  • Published:
Transportation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Studies that model the effects of land use on commuting generally use a trip-based approach or a more aggregated individual-based approach: i.e. commuting is conceptualized in terms of modal choice, distance and time per single trip, or in terms of daily commuting distance or time. However, people try to schedule activities in a daily pattern and, thus, consider tours instead of trips. Data from the 2000 to 2001 Travel Behaviour Survey in Ghent (Belgium) illustrate that car use and commuting times significantly differ between commuting trips within work-only tours and more complex tours. Therefore, this paper considers trip-related decisions simultaneously with tour-related decisions. A multiple group structural equation model (SEM) confirmed that the relationship between land use and commuting differs between work-only tours and more complex tours. Trips should be considered within tours in order to correctly understand the effect of land use scenarios such as densifying on commuting. Moreover, the use of multiple group SEM enabled us to address the issue of the complex nature of commuting. Due to interactions between various explanatory variables, land use patterns do not always have the presumed effect on commuting. Land use policy can successfully influence commuting, but only if it simultaneously accounts for the effects on car availability, car use, commuting distance and commuting time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Badoe, D.A., Miller, E.J.: Transportation––land-use interaction: empirical findings in North America, and their implications for modelling. Transp. Res. D 5, 235–263 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagley, M.N., Mokhtarian, P.L.: The impact of residential neighborhood type on travel behavior: a structural equation modeling approach. Ann. Reg. Sci. 36, 279–297 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhat, C.R.: Work travel mode choice and number of non-work commute stops. Transp. Res. B 31, 41–54 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhat, C.R., Gossen, R.: A mixed multinomial logit model analysis of weekend recreational episode type choice. Transp. Res. B 38, 767–787 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhat, C.R., Guo, J.Y.: A comprehensive analysis of built environment characteristics on household residential choice and auto ownership levels. Transp. Res. B 41, 506–526 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhat, C.R., Koppelman, F.S.: Activity-based modeling of travel demand. In: Hall, R.W. (ed.) Handbook of Transportation Science, pp. 39–65. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • Boarnet, M., Sarmiento, S.: Can land use policy really affect travel behavior ? A study of the link between non-work travel and land use characteristics. Urban Stud. 35, 1155–1169 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buliung, R.N., Kanaroglou, P.S.: Urban form and household activity-travel behavior. Growth Chang. 37, 172–199 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B.M.: Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS Basic Concepts Applications and Programming. Lawrence Erlbaum Associated, Mahwah (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao, X.Y., Handy, S.L., Mokhtarian, P.L.: The influences of the built environment and residential self-selection on pedestrian behaviour: evidence from Austin, TX. Transportation 33, 1–20 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao, X.Y., Mokhtarian, P.L., Handy, S.L.: Do changes in neighborhood characteristics lead to changes in travel behavior ? A structural equations modeling approach. Transportation 34, 535–556 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao, X.Y., Mokhtarian, P.L., Handy, S.L.: Differentiating the influence of accessibility, attitudes, and demographics on stop participation and frequency during the evening commute. Environ. Plan. B 35, 431–442 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cervero, R.: Mixed land-uses and commuting: evidence from the American housing survey. Transp. Res. A 30, 361–377 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cervero, R., Kockelman, K.: Travel demand and the 3D’s: density, diversity and design. Transp. Res. D 2, 199–219 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cervero, R., Seskin, S.: An Evaluation of the Relationships Between Transit and Urban Form, National Research Council. Transportation Cooperative Research Program, Washington, DC (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatman, D.: How density and mixed uses at the workplace affect personal commercial travel and commute mode choice. Transp. Res. Rec. 1831, 193–201 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C., Gong, H., Paaswell, R.: Role of the built environment on mode choice decisions: additional evidence on the impact of density. Transportation 35, 285–299 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crane, R.: The influence of urban form on travel: an interpretive review. J. Plan. Lit. 15, 3–23 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Abreu e Silva, J., Goulias, K.G.: A structural equations model of land use patterns, location choice, and travel behavior in Seattle and comparison with Lisbon. In: Paper presented at the 88th Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington, DC (2009)

  • de Abreu e Silva, J., Golob, T.F., Goulias, K.G.: Effects of land use characteristics on residence and employment location and travel behaviour of urban adult workers. Transp. Res. Rec. 1977, 121–131 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dieleman, F.M., Dijst, M., Burghouwt, G.: Urban form and travel behaviour: micro-level household attributes and residential context. Urban Stud. 39, 507–527 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewing, R., Cervero, R.: Travel and the built environment: a synthesis. Transp. Res. Rec. 1780, 87–114 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewing, R., Haliyur, P., Page, G.W.: Getting around a traditional city, a suburban planned unit development, and everything in between. Transp. Res. Rec. 1466, 53–62 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, L.D., Pivo, G.: Impacts of mixed use and density on utilization of three modes of travel: single-occupant vehicle, transit and walking. Transp. Res. Rec. 1466, 44–52 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, L., Bradley, M., Kavage, S., Chapman, J., Lawton, K.: Urban form, travel time, and cost relationships with tour complexity and mode choice. Transportation 35, 37–54 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao, S., Mokhtarian, P.L., Johnston, R.A.: Exploring the connections among job accessibility, employment, income, and auto ownership using structural equation modeling. Ann. Reg. Sci. 42, 341–356 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geurs, K.T., van Wee, B.: Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: review and research directions. J. Transp. Geogr. 12, 127–140 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giuliano, G., Dargay, J.: Car ownership, travel and land use: a comparison of the US and Great Britain. Transp. Res. A 40, 106–124 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Glorieux, I., Minnen, J., van Tienoven, T.P.: Tijdsbesteding in België. Veranderingen in Tijdsbesteding tussen 1999 en 2005. (Time-Use in Belgium. Changes in Time Use Between 1999 and 2005). Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Vakgroep Sociologie, Onderzoeksgroep TOR, Brussel (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, M.J.: The road less travelled––New urbanist inducements to travel mode substitution for nonwork trips. J. Plan Educ. Res. 23, 39–57 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, J.Y., Elhat, C.R., Copperman, R.B.: Effects of the built environment on motorized and nonmotorized trip making––subjective, complementary, or synergistic ? Transp. Res. Rec. 2010, 172–199 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handy, S.: How Land Use Patterns Affect Travel Patterns. Council of Planning Librarians, Chicago (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  • Handy, S.: Methodologies for exploring the link between urban form and travel behavior. Transp. Res. D 1, 151–165 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handy, S.: Smarth growth and the transportation––land use connection: what does the research tell us ? Int. Reg. Sci. Rev. 28, 146–167 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, S.: The context of urban travel: concepts and recent trends. In: Hanson, S., Guiliano, G. (eds.) The Geography of Urban Transportation, pp. 1–29. The Guildford Press, New York (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayduk, L.A.: Structural Equation Modeling with LISREL. Essentials and Advances. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hensher, D.A., Reves, A.J.: Trip chaining as a barrier to the propensity to use public transport. Transportation 27, 341–361 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L., Bentler, P.M.: Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis. Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct. Equ. Model 6, 1–55 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, P.M., Koppelman, F.S., Orfeuil, J.P.: Activity analysis: state of the art and future directions. In: Jones, P. (ed.) Developments in Dynamic and Activity-Based Approaches to Travel Analysis, pp. 34–55. Gower, Aldershot (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitamura, R., Mokhtarian, P.L., Laidet, L.: A micro-analysis of land use and travel in five neighbourhoods in the San Francisco Bay Area. Transportation 24, 125–158 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kline, R.B.: Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. Guilford Pres, New York (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Krizek, K.: Neighborhood services, trip purpose, and tour-based travel. Transportation 30, 387–410 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Limanond, T., Niemeier, D.A.: Effect of land use on decisions of shopping tour generation: a case study of three traditional neighbourhoods in WA. Transportation 31, 153–181 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maat, K., Timmermans, H.: Influence of land use on tour complexity––a Dutch case. Transp. Res. Rec. 1977, 234–241 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maat, K., van Wee, B., Stead, D.: Land use and travel behaviour: expected effects from the perspective of utility theory and activity-based theories. Environ. Plan. B 32, 33–46 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNally, M.G.: The activity-based approach. In: Hensher, D.A., Button, K.J. (eds.) Handbook of Transport Modeling, pp. 53–69. Pergamon, Oxford (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mérenne, B., Van der Haegen, H., Van Hecke, E.: België ruimtelijk doorgelicht (Belgium: spatially investigated). Tijdschr van het Gem 51, 1–144 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • Meurs, H., Haaijer, R.: Spatial structure and mobility. Transp. Res. D 6, 429–446 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, E.J., Ibrahim, A.: Urban forms and vehicular travel: some empirical findings. Transp. Res. Rec. 1617, 18–27 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, B., Kaplan, D.: A comparison of some methodologies for the factor analysis of non-normal Likert variables. Br. J. Math. Stat. Psychol. 38, 171–189 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, B., Kaplan, D.: A comparison of some methodologies for the factor analysis of non-normal Likert variables: a note on the size of the model. Br. J. Math. Stat. Psychol. 45, 19–30 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, L.K., Muthén, B.O.: Mplus User’s Guide, 4th edn. Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • N.N.: Ontwerp Mobiliteitsplan Vlaanderen (A First Draft of the Mobility Plan Flanders). Ministerie van de Vlaamse Overheid, Brussel (2001)

  • Noland, R.B., Thomas, J.V.: Multivariate analysis of trip-chaining behavior. Environ. Plan. B 34, 953–970 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oud, J.H.L., Folmer, H.: A structural equation approach to models with spatial dependence. Geogr. Anal. 40, 152–166 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, Z.R.: The jobs-housing balance and urban commuting. Urban Stud. 34, 1215–1235 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinjari, A.R., Pendyala, R., Bhat, C.R., Waddell, P.A.: Modeling residential sorting effects to understand the impacts of the built environment on commute mode choice. Transportation 34, 557–573 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potoglou, D., Kanarolgou, P.S.: Modelling car ownership in urban areas: a case study of Hamilton, Canada. J. Transp. Geogr. 16, 42–54 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Primerano, F., Taylor, M.A.P., Pitaksringkarn, L., Tisato, P.: Defining and understanding trip chaining behaviour. Transportation 35, 55–72 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajamani, J., Bhat, C.R., Handy, S., Knaap, G., Song, Y.: Assessing impact of urban form measures on nonwork trip mode choice after controlling for demographic and level-of-service effects. Transp. Res. Rec. 1831, 158–165 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raykov, T., Marcoulides, G.A.: A First Course in Structural Equation Modeling. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, New Jersey (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Salomon, I., Ben-Akiva, M.: The use of the life-style concept in travel demand models. Environ. Plan. A 15, 623–638 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schimek, P.: Household motor vehicle ownership and use: how much does residential density matter? Transp. Res. Rec. 1552, 120–125 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwanen, T.: Urban form and: a cross-European perspective. Tijdschr voor Econ en Soc Geogr 93, 336–343 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwanen, T., Dijst, M., Dieleman, F.M.: A microlevel analysis of residential context and travel time. Environ. Plan. A 34, 1487–1507 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwanen, T., Dijst, M., Dieleman, F.M.: Policies for urban form and their impact on travel: the Netherlands experience. Urban Stud. 41, 579–603 (2004a)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwanen, T., Dieleman, F.M., Dijst, M.: The impact of metropolitan structure on commute behavior in the Netherlands: a multilevel approach. Growth Chang. 35, 304–333 (2004b)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen, Q.: Spatial and social dimensions of commuting. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 66, 68–82 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiftan, Y., Barlach, Y.: Effect of employment site characteristics on commute mode choice. Transp. Res. Rec. 1781, 19–25 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simma, A., Axhausen, K.W.: Interactions between travel behaviour, accessibility and personal characteristics: the case of Upper Austria. Eur. J. Transp. Infrastruct. Res. 3, 179–197 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Soltani, A.: Exploring the impacts of built environments on vehicle ownership. In: Satoh, K. (ed.) Proceedings of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, pp. 2151–2163 (2005)

  • Srinivasan, S.: Quantifying spatial characteristics of cities. Urban Stud. 39, 2005–2028 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stead, D., Marshall, S.: The relationships between urban form and travel patterns. An international review and evaluation. Eur. J. Transp. Infrastruct. Res. 1, 113–141 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • Strathman, J.G., Dueker, K.J., Davis, J.S.: Effects of household structure and selected travel characteristics on trip chaining. Transportation 21, 23–45 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Susilo, Y.O., Maat, K.: The influence of built environment to the trends in commuting journeys in the Netherlands. Transportation 34, 589–609 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Acker, V., Witlox, F.: Car ownership as a mediating variable in car travel behaviour research using a structural equation modelling approach to identify its dual relationship. J. Transp. Geogr. 18, 65–74 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Acker, V., Witlox, F., van Wee, B.: The effects of the land use system on travel behaviour: a structural equation modelling approach. Transp. Plan. Techol. 30, 331–354 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Acker, V., van Wee, B., Witlox, F.: When transport geography meets social psychology: toward a conceptual model of travel behaviour. Transp. Rev. 30, 219–240 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Wee, B.: Land use and transport: research and policy challenges. J. Transp. Geogr. 10, 259–271 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vande Walle, S., Steenberghen, T.: Space and time related determinants of public transport use in trip chains. Transp. Res. 40, 151–162 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhetsel, A., Thomas, I., Van Hecke, E., Beelen, M.: Pendel in België. Deel I: De Woon-Werkverplaatsingen. (Commuting in Belgium. Par I: Commuting trips). FOD Economie. K.M.O, Middenstand en Energie, Brussel (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Witlox, F.: Evaluating the reliability of reported distance data in urban travel behaviour analysis. J. Transp. Geogr. 15, 172–183 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ye, X., Pendyala, R.M., Gottardi, G.: An exploration of the relationship between mode choice and complexity of trip chaining patterns. Transp. Res. B 41, 96–113 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, C.-Y.: Evaluating cutoff criteria of model fit indices for latent variable models with binary and continuous outcomes. PhD dissertation, Graduate School of Education and Information Studies, University of California, Los Angeles, CA (1999)

  • Zwerts, E., Nuyts, E.: Onderzoek Verplaatsingsgedrag Stadsgewest Gent (januari 2000–januari 2001). Deel 3A: Analyse Personen Vragenlijst (Travel Behaviour Survey Ghent Urban Region (January 2000–January 2001). Part 3A: Analysis Personal Questionnaire). Provinciale Hogeschool Limburg, Hasselt (2001)

Download references

Acknowledgement

We would like to acknowledge the input made by Patricia Mokhtarian (UC, Davis) on an earlier version of this paper. We would like also to thank the three anonymous reviewers of this paper for their valuable comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geography, Ghent University, Krijgslaan 281, S8, 9000, Ghent, Belgium

    Veronique Van Acker & Frank Witlox

Authors
  1. Veronique Van Acker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Frank Witlox
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Veronique Van Acker.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Van Acker, V., Witlox, F. Commuting trips within tours: how is commuting related to land use?. Transportation 38, 465–486 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-010-9309-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-010-9309-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation