Abstract
Though much attention has been given to the relationship between contractor and vendor in regard to governmental accountability, little attention has been paid to the internal struggles that surface in regard to accountability in the procurement process. These informal horizontal relationships often circumvent vertical accountability controls most often thought to ensure equitable vendor selection. Similarly, though much attention has been paid to political influence in contracting, hierarchal organizational structures, and measures of performance, the contract officer-program manager relation has not been explored. Specifically, the informal tension that often forms between the program manager and contract officer has not been examined in regard to such accountability. This paper examines the relationship between the program officer and the contract officer in order to describe how hybrid public administration can affect the contracting process.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bardach, E., & Lesser, C. (1996). Accountability in human services collaboratives—for what? and to whom? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 6(2), 197–224.
Bovens, M., Schillemans, T., & Hart, P. T. (2008). Does public accountability work? An assessment tool. Public Administration, 86(1), 225–242.
Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2008). The challenge of coordination in central government organizations: the Norwegian case. Public Organization Review, 8(2), 97–116.
Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2011). Complexity and hybrid public administration—theoretical and empirical challenges. Public Organization Review, 11(4), 407–423.
Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2014). Performance and accountability—a theoretical discussion and an empirical assessment. Public Organization Review, 1–19.
Cooper, P. J. (1980). Government contracts in public administration: The role and environment of the contracting officer. Public Administration Review, 459–468.
Dubnick, M. (2005). Accountability and the promise of performance: in search of the mechanisms. Public Performance and Management Review, 28(3), 376–417.
Halachmi, A. (2002). Performance measurement: a look at some possible dysfunctions. Work Study, 51(5), 230–239.
History of the Mosque of Cordoba. (2015) Retrieved May 4, 2015 from http://www.mezquitadecordoba.org/en/history-mosque-cordoba.asp.
Hood, C. (1995). The “New Public Management” in the 1980s: variations on a theme. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20(2), 93–109.
Kelman, S. (1990). Procurement and public management: The fear of discretion and the quality of government performance. University Press of America.
Macneil, I. R. (1973). Many futures of contracts. The Southern California Law Review, 47, 691–738.
Meyers, M. K., Riccucci, N. M., & Lurie, I. (2001). Achieving goal congruence in complex environments: the case of welfare reform. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11(2), 165–202.
Monteiro, L. D. (2011). The Mezquita of Córdoba is made of more than bricks: towards a broader definition of the “Heritage” protected at UNESCO world heritage sites. Archaeologies, 7(2), 312–328.
Mulgan, R. (1997). Contracting out and accountability. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 56(4), 106–116.
Romzek, B. S., LeRoux, K., & Blackmar, J. M. (2012). A preliminary theory of informal accountability among network organizational actors. Public Administration Review, 72(3), 442–453.
Ruggles, D. F. (2006). The Great Mosque of Córdoba. The Literature of Al-Andalus, 159–162.
Schillemans, T. (2008). Accountability in the shadow of hierarchy: the horizontal accountability of agencies. Public Organization Review, 8(2), 175–194.
Sorber, K., & Straight, R. (1995). Competing contracting offices: working better, costing less. Public Administration Quarterly, 375–385.
Stake, R. E. (2000). Case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (Ch 6).
Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge University.
Thompson, F. J., & Riccucci, N. M. (1998). Reinventing government. Annual Review of Political Science, 1(1), 231–257.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bromberg, D.E. Gatekeepers: How Procurement Personnel Guard Against Hybrid Accountability. Public Organiz Rev 16, 549–560 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-015-0325-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-015-0325-z