Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Role Congruity Theory: Perceptions of Fairness and Sexism in Sport Management

  • Published:
Public Organization Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study applied three dimensions of organizational justice - distributive justice, procedural justice, and interpersonal justice – to high school athletics to determine if the fairness perceptions held by head coaches towards their athletic director differed based upon the sex of the athletic director or sex of the coach, after controlling for the level of ambivalent sexism of the coach. If fairness perceptions did differ significantly, the findings would support the notion that attitudes towards women in leadership roles were less positive than attitudes towards men even after controlling for sexist attitudes, thus supporting role congruity theory of prejudice toward women in leadership roles. The results indicated the fairness perceptions held by the coaches differed depending upon the sex of the coach and sex of the athletic director. After controlling for the coaches’ sexist attitudes, male coaches’ perceptions of distributive justice of female athletic directors was significantly lower than female coaches’ perceptions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acosta, R.V., & Carpenter, L.J. (2013). Women in intercollegiate sport: A longitudinal, national study thirty-five year update. Retrieved from: http://acostacarpenter.org/AcostaCarpenter2012.pdf.

  • Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267–299). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agars, M. D. (2004). Reconsidering the impact of gender stereotypes on the advancement of women in organizations. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28(2), 103–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beazley, C. (Ed.). (2009). The national directory of high school coaches: 2009–2010 edition. Montgomery: Athletic Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapleau, K. M., Oswald, D. L., & Russell, B. L. (2007). How ambivalent sexism toward women and men support rape myth acceptance. Sex Roles, 57, 131–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen-Charash, Y., & Spector, P. (2001). The role of justice in organizations: a meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86(2), 271–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colquitt, J. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: a construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 386–400.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Colquitt, J. A., & Shaw, J. C. (2005). How should organizational justice be measured? In J. Greenberg & J. A. Colquitt (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colquitt, J., Conlon, D., Wesson, M., Porter, C., & Ng, K. (2001). Justice at the millennium: a meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 425–445.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Colquitt, J., Noe, R., & Jackson, C. (2002). Justice in teams: antecedents and consequences of procedural justice climate. Personnel Psychology, 55, 83–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109(3), 573–598.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T., & Boeckmann, R. J. (2007). Beliefs about gender discrimination in the workplace in the context of affirmative action: effects of gender and ambivalent attitudes in an Australian sample. Sex Roles, 57, 31–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fields, D., Pang, M., & Chiu, C. (2000). Distributive and procedural justice as predictors of employee outcomes in Hong Kong. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(5), 547–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foley, S., Hang-Yue, N., & Wong, A. (2005). Perceptions of discrimination and justice: are there gender differences in outcomes? Group and Organization Management, 30(4), 421–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folger, R., & Konovsky, M. (1989). Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decision. Academy of Management Journal, 32(2), 115–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56(2), 109–118.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Green, S. B., Salkind, N. J., & Akey, T. M. (2000). Using SPSS for windows: Analyzing and interpreting data (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (1987). A taxonomy of organizational justice theories. Academy of Management Review, 12(1), 9–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J., & Colquitt, J. A. (2005). The handbook of organizational justice. Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J., & Cropanzano, R. (Eds.). (2001). Advances in organizational justice. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J., Mark, M., & Lehman, D. (1985). Justice in sports and games. Journal of Sport Behavior, 8(1), 18–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, D., & Isbell, L. M. (2002). Ambivalent sexism and the dumb blonde: Men’s and women’s reactions to sexist jokes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 341–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heilman, M. E. (2001). Description and prescription: how gender stereotypes prevent women’s ascent up the organizational ladder. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 657–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, B., & Gillis, J. (2006). Participation in High School Sports Increases Again; Confirms NFHS Commitment to Stronger Leadership. Retrieved on July 23, 2007 from: http://www.nfhs.org/web/2006/09/participation_in_high_school_sports_increases_again_confirms_nf.aspx.

  • Hums, M., & Chelladurai, P. (1994a). Distributive justice in intercollegiate athletics: development of an instrument. Journal of Sport Management, 8, 190–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hums, M., & Chelladurai, P. (1994b). Distributive justice in intercollegiate athletics: the views of NCAA coaches and administrators. Journal of Sport Management, 8, 200–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, J. S., Gillentine, J. A., & Hunt, B. P. (2004). The influence of fairness: the application of organizational justice in a team sport setting. International Sports Journal, 8(1), 139–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, J. S., Turner, B. A., & DuBord, R. R. (2007). Organizational justice as a predictor of job satisfaction: an examination of university recreation department student employees. International Journal of Sport Management, 8(1), 32–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoppers, A. (1987). Gender and the coaching profession. Quest, 39, 9–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, S., Schaubroeck, J., & Aryee, S. (2002). Relationship between organizational justice and employee work outcomes: a cross-national study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovett, D., & Lowry, C. (1994). “Good old boys” and “good old girls” clubs: myth or reality? Journal of Sport Management, 8, 27–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahony, D., & Pastore, D. (1998). Distributive justice: an examination of participation opportunities, revenues, and expenses at NCAA institutions – 1973–1993. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 22, 127–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahony, D., Hums, M., & Riemer, H. (2002). Distributive justice in intercollegiate athletics: perceptions of athletic director and athletic board chairs. Journal of Sport Management, 16, 331–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moorman, R. (1991). Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship? Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 845–855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moya, M., Esposito, F., & Casado, P. (1999). Women’s reactions to hostile and benevolent sexist situations. Paper presented at the 22nd General Meeting of the European Association of Experimental Social Psychology, Oxford, England.

  • Reskin, B. F., & Ross, C. E. (1995). Jogs, authority, and earnings among managers: The continuing significance of sex. In J. A. Jacobs (Ed.), Gender inequality at work (pp. 127–151). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridgeway, C. L. (2001). Gender, status, and leadership. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 637–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B. L., & Trigg, K. Y. (2004). Tolerance of sexual harassment: an examination of gender differences, ambivalent sexism, social dominance, and gender roles. Sex Roles, 50, 565–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schein, V. E. (2001). A global look at psychological barriers to women’s progress in management. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 675–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sczesny, S. (2003). A closer look beneath the surface: various facets of the think-manager-think-male stereotype. Sex Roles, 49, 353–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stangl, J. M., & Kane, M. J. (1991). Structural variables that offer explanatory power for the underrepresentation of women coaches since title IX: the case of homologous reproduction. Sociology of Sport Journal, 8(1), 47–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweeney, P. D., & McFarlin, D. B. (1997). Process and outcome: gender differences in the assessment of justice. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 83–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hilldale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whisenant, W. (2003). How women have fared as interscholastic athletic administrators since the passage of Title IX. Sex Roles, 49(3/4), 179–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whisenant, W. (2005a). In Texas it’s football: How women are denied access to the AD’s office. International Journal of Sport Management, 6(2), 343–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whisenant, W. (2005b). Organizational justice and commitment in interscholastic sports. Sport, Education and Society, 10(3), 343–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whisenant, W., & Smucker, M. (2009). Organizational justice and job satisfaction in coaching. Public Organization Review, 9, 157–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whisenant, W., Miller, J., & Pedersen, P. M. (2005). Systemic barriers in athletic administration: an analysis of job descriptions for interscholastic athletic directors. Sex Roles, 53, 911–918.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamawaki, N., Darby, R., & Queiroz, A. (2007). The moderating role of ambivalent sexism: the influence of power status on perception of rape victim and rapist. The Journal of Social Psychology, 147, 41–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Exercise and Sport Sciences, University of Miami, PO Box 248065, Coral Gables, FL, 33124-2040, USA

    Warren Whisenant, Debbiesiu L. Lee & Windy Dees

Authors
  1. Warren Whisenant
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Debbiesiu L. Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Windy Dees
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Warren Whisenant.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Whisenant, W., Lee, D.L. & Dees, W. Role Congruity Theory: Perceptions of Fairness and Sexism in Sport Management. Public Organiz Rev 15, 475–485 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-014-0281-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-014-0281-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation