Abstract
Over the past few decades, the typical ages at which young adults enter a first union have risen in many regions of the world. Demographers have long been interested in marriage patterns, because variations in the timing of marriage and in the percentage ever-married have been key factors in modifying rates of population growth. To this long-standing interest, we must now add new reasons for demographers to pay attention to age at marriage. Most notably, variations can signal profound changes in social relations within the family and in the labor market. This special issue presents six articles drawn from an international seminar on first union patterns around the world, organized by the Panel on Nuptiality of the International Union for the Scientific Study of Population. The authors present new findings on world trends and on recent developments in Canada, China, India, Sub-Saharan Africa, and the United States.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbasi-Shavazi, M. J., McDonald, P., & Hosseini-Chavoshi, M. (2009). The fertility transition in Iran: Revolution and reproduction. Dordrecht: Springer.
Banerji, M. & Vanneman, R. (2009). Does love make a difference? Marriage type and post marriage decision-making power. In Annual Meeting of the Population Association of America. Detroit.
Burgess, E. W., & Locke, H. J. (1945). The family: From institution to companionship. New York: American Book Company.
Caldwell, J. C. (1982). Theory of fertility decline. New York: Academic Press.
Carmichael, G. A. (1995). Consensual partnering in the more developed countries. Journal of the Australian Population Association, 12, 51–86.
Cherlin, A. J. (2009). The marriage-go-round: The state of marriage and the family in America today. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Desai, S., & Lester, A. (2010). Gender scripts and age at marriage in India. Demography, 47, 667–687.
Esteve, A., Lesthaege, R., & López-Gay, A. (2012). The Latin American cohabitation boom, 1970–2007. Population and Development Review, 38, 55–81.
Kiernan, K. E. (1999). Cohabitation in Western Europe. Population Trends, 96, 25–32. Summer.
LaPierre-Adamcyk, E., Le Bourdais, C., & Marcil-Gratton, N. (1999). Vivre en Couple pour la Première Fois: La Signification due Choix de l’Union Libre au Québec at on Ontario. Cahiers Québécois de Démographie, 28, 199–227.
Lesthaeghe, R. (2010). The unfolding story of the second demographic transition. Population and Development Review, 36, 211–251.
Lesthaeghe, R., & Surkyn, J. (1988). Cultural dynamics and economic theories of fertility change. Population and Development Review, 14, 1–45.
Quilodrán, J. (2008). A post-transitional nuptiality model in Latin America? In International seminar on changing transitions to marriage: Gender implications for the next generation. New Delhi.
Sibanda, A., Woubalem, Z., Hogan, D. O., & Lindstrom, D. P. (2003). The proximate determinants of the decline to below-replacement fertility in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Studies in Family Planning, 34, 1–7.
Trost, J. (1978). A renewed social institution: Non-marital cohabitation. Acta Sociologica, 21, 303–315.
United Nations. (2009). World Marriage Data 2008 (POP/DB/Marr/Rev2008). In Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, vol. 2012.
van de Kaa, D. (1987). Europe's second demographic transition. Population Bulletin, 42, 1–59.
Xu, X., & Whyte, M. K. (1990). Love matches and arranged marriages: A Chinese replication. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 709–722.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cherlin, A.J. First Union Patterns Around the World: Introduction to the Special Issue. Popul Res Policy Rev 33, 153–159 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-013-9320-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-013-9320-7