Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Normative Groups: The Rise of the Formation of the First Union Through Cohabitation in Quebec, a Comparative Approach

  • Published:
Population Research and Policy Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The rise of cohabitation in Quebec has attracted the interest of some demographers who have documented it, but why or how Quebec actively adopted this new behavior while it long had a reputation for being conservative in attitudes and behaviors with respect to family is still debated. One view is that this shift is related to an important transformation of the foundation of the normative system shared by the members of its main socio-religious group, French-speaking Catholics. This article is part of a research effort looking for empirical evidence to sustain this claim. Using data from the 1984 National Fertility Survey and from the 1990, 1995, 2001, and 2006 General Social Surveys, we estimate the hazard functions of the formation of the first union by marriage or by cohabitation for ten-year birth cohorts from 1911 to 1981 among several “normative groups” defined by language, religion, and province of residence. The results support the notion that the demise of the formation of the first union by marriage and its replacement by cohabitation in Quebec is typical of French-speaking Quebecers, among which those who declare themselves Catholic have become similar to those who declare having no religious affiliation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Balakrishnan, T. R., Lapierre-Adamcyk, E., & Krotki, K. K. (1993). Family and childbearing in Canada: A demographic analysis. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum, G. (1990). Le rapport Dumont. Démocratiser l’Église catholique. Sociologie et sociétés, 22(2), 115–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. (1985). Human capital, effort, and the sexual division of labor. Journal of Labor Economics, 3, S33–S58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bélanger, A., & Turcotte, P. (1999). L’influence des caractéristiques sociodémographiques sur le début de la vie conjugale des Québécoises. Cahiers québécois de démographie, 28(1–2), 173–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belliveau, J.-A., Oderkirk, J., & Silver, C. (1994). Common-law unions: The Quebec difference. Canadian Social Trends, 33, 8–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burman, D., & Pineau, J. (1991). Le patrimoine familial. Montreal: Les Éditions Thémis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conseil du statut de la femme (CSF). (1978). Égalité et indépendance. Quebec City: L’Éditeur officiel du Québec.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conseil du statut de la femme (CSF). (1988). Mémoire du Conseil du statut de la femme présenté lors de la consultation générale sur les droits économiques des conjoints. Quebec City and Montreal: Conseil du statut de la femme.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortina, C., Laplante, B., Fostik, A., & Castro Martín, T. (2012). Same-sex marriages and partnerships in two pioneer countries, Canada and Spain. Paper presented at the 2012 European Population Conference, Stockholm.

  • Dumas, J., Bélanger, A., & Smith, G. (1997). Common-law unions in Canada at the end of the 20th century. In J. Dumas, A. Bélanger, & G. Smith (Eds.), Report on the demographic situation in Canada 1996 (pp. 121–186). Ottawa: Statistics Canada, Demography Division.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferretti, L. (1999). La révolution tranquille. L’Action nationale, 89(10), 59–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauvreau, M. (2005). The Catholic origins of Quebec’s quiet revolution, 1931–1970. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauvreau, D., Gervais, D., & Gossage, P. (2007). La fécondité des Québécoises, 1870–1970: d’une exception à l’autre. Montreal: Les Éditions du Boréal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouvernement du Québec (GQ). (1996). Rapport du comité interministériel sur les unions de fait. Quebec City: Unpublished.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hango, D., & Le Bourdais, C. (2007). Early union formation in Canada: Links with education. European Journal of Population, 23(3–4), 339–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heuveline, P., & Timberlake, J. M. (2004). The role of cohabitation in family formation: The United States in comparative perspective. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 1214–1230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Institut de la statistique du Québec (ISQ). (2012). Naissances selon l’état matrimonial des parents, Québec, 1951–2011. Accessed April 04–10, 2012 from http://www.stat.gouv.qc.ca/donstat/societe/demographie/naisn_deces/naissance/410.htm.

  • Kerr, D., Moyser, M., & Beaujot, R. (2006). Marriage and cohabitation: Demographic and socioeconomic differences in Quebec and Canada. Canadian Studies in Population, 33(1), 83–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitchin, S. B. (1912). A history of divorce. Union: Lawbook Exchange.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kronby, M. C. (2010). Canadian family law (10th ed.). Mississauga: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Küng, H. (1971). Infallible? An inquiry (E. Quinn, Trans.). Garden City: Doubleday.

  • Lapierre-Adamcyk, É., Le Bourdais, C., & Marcil-Gratton, N. (1999). Vivre en couple pour la première fois: la signification du choix de l’union libre au Québec et en Ontario. Cahiers québécois de démographie, 28(1–2), 199–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laplante, B. (2006). The rise of cohabitation in Quebec: Power of religion and power over religion. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 31, 2–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laplante, B., & Flick, C. (2010). Le mariage, l’union de fait et la santé au Québec et en Ontario. Cahiers québécois de démographie, 39(1), 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laplante, B., Miller, C., & Malherbe, P. (2006). The evolution of beliefs and opinions on matters related to marriage and sexual behaviour of French-speaking Catholic Quebecers and English-speaking Protestant Ontarians. Canadian Studies in Population, 33, 209–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lardoux, S., & Pelletier, D. (2012). Trajectoires conjugales des parents et rendement scolaire des enfants en première année du primaire. Cahiers québécois de démographie, 41(2), 369–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Bourdais, C., & Lapierre-Adamcyk, É. (2004). Changes in conjugal life in Canada: Is cohabitation progressively replacing marriage? Journal of Marriage and the Family, 66(4), 929–942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Bourdais, C., & Marcil-Gratton, N. (1996). Family transformations across the Canadian/American border: When the laggard becomes the leader. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 27, 415–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lessard, M. A., & Montminy, J. P. (1967). Les religieuses du Canada : âge, recrutement et persévérance. Recherches sociographiques, 8(1), 15–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesthaeghe, R., & Surkyn, J. (1988). Cultural dynamics and economic theories of fertility change. Population and Development Review, 14(1), 1–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, J. (1987). The making of theology. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meunier, E.-M., & Warren, J.-P. (2002). Sortir de la “Grande Noirceur”. Sillery: Les Éditions du Septentrion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noonan, J. T, Jr. (1965). Contraception. A history of its treatment by the Catholic theologians and canonists. Cambridge: Belknap Press/Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oppenheimer, V. K. (2003). Cohabiting and marriage during young men’s career-development. Demography, 40(1), 127–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, J. D., & Payne, M. A. (2008). Canadian family law (3rd ed.). Toronto: Irwin Law.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, R. (1988). Putting asunder: A history of divorce in the western society. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pineau, J., & Pratte, M. (2006). La famille. Montreal: Les Éditions Thémis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, M. S., & Wu, Z. (1998). Divergence of marriage patterns in Quebec and elsewhere in Canada. Population and Development Review, 24(2), 329–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratzinger, J. (1987). Principles of Catholic theology: Building stones for a fundamental theology. San Francisco: Ignatius Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royston, P., & Lambert, P. C. (2011). Flexible parametric survival analysis using Stata: Beyond the Cox model. College Station TX: Stata Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royston, P., & Sauerbrei, W. (2007). Multivariable modeling with cubic regression splines: A principled approach. Stata Journal, 7(1), 45–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Canada. (2013). Age group of child, census family structure and sex for the children in census families in private households of Canada, provinces, territories, census metropolitan areas and census agglomerations, 2006 and 2011 censuses. Ottawa: Statistics Canada. (98-312-XCB2011023).

  • Supreme Court of Canada. (2013). Quebec (Attorney General) v. A, 2013 SCC 5.

  • Tétreault, M. (2010). Droit de la famille (Vol. 1). Cowansville: Les Éditions Yvon Blais.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turcotte, P., & Bélanger, A. (1997). Moving in together: The formation of first common-law unions. Canadian Social Trends, 47, 7–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turcotte, P., & Goldscheider, F. (1998). Evolution of factors influencing first union formation in Canada. Canadian Studies in Population, 25(2), 145–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Kaa, D. J. (1987). Europe’s second demographic transition. Population Bulletin, 42(1), 1–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, J.-P., & Meunier, E.-M. (1999). L’horizon “personnaliste” de la révolution tranquille. Société, 20–21, 347–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Z. (2000). Cohabitation. An alternative form of family living. Don Mills: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre Urbanisation Culture Société, Institut national de la recherche scientifique, Université du Québec, 385, rue Sherbrooke Est, Montréal, QC, H2X 1E3, Canada

    Benoît Laplante

Authors
  1. Benoît Laplante
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benoît Laplante.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Laplante, B. Normative Groups: The Rise of the Formation of the First Union Through Cohabitation in Quebec, a Comparative Approach. Popul Res Policy Rev 33, 257–285 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-013-9279-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-013-9279-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation