Abstract
Children are increasingly spending time in cohabiting parent families. Most studies that examine the implications of parental cohabitation focus on parental living arrangements at a single point in time. Using data from the National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG), we assess whether and how parental cohabitation during childhood influences adolescent girls’ well-being. This work moves beyond prior studies by specifically considering the effects of the exposure to, transitions, and age at which children lived in cohabiting parent families. The results indicate living in cohabiting parent families is consequential for earlier sexual initiation, likelihood of having a teen birth, and high school graduation. Prior work suggests that the explanation for the negative effect of parental cohabitation is family instability. Yet, our empirical work shows that family instability does not explain the relationship between cohabitation and negative child outcomes. We conclude that the best way to understand the implications of parental cohabitation is to adopt a dynamic family experience model.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
We test for interactions of cohabiting parent families and birth cohort. We find that the effects of cohabiting parent families are similar across all birth cohorts considered in this paper.
References
Acs, G., & Nelson, S. (2002). The kids are alright? Children’s well-being and the rise in cohabitation. New Federalism B-48: National Survey of America’s Families. Washington D.C: The Urban Institute.
Becker, G. (1991). A treatise on the family. Harvard University Press.
Brown, S. (2002). Child well-being in cohabiting families. In Alan Booth & Ann C. Crouter (Eds.) Just living together: Implications for children, families, and public policy (pp. 173–188). Lawrence-Erlbaum.
Brown, S. (2004). Family structure and child well-being: The significance of parental cohabitation. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 351–367.
Brown, S. (2006). Family structure transitions and adolescent well-being. Demography, 43, 447–461.
Brown, S., & Manning, W. (2004). Family structure measurement: Reconciling adolescents and mother reports of cohabiting stepfamilies. Working Paper 2004-08, Center for Family and Demographic Research. Bowling Green State University.
Buchanan, C., Maccoby, E., & Dornbusch, S. (1996). Adolescents after divorce. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bumpass, L., & Lu, H. H. (2000). Trends in cohabitation and implications for children’s family contexts. Population Studies, 54, 29–41.
Bumpass, L., Raley, K., & Sweet, J. (1995). The changing character of stepfamilies: Implications of cohabitation and nonmarital childbearing. Demography, 32, 425–436.
Carlson, M., & Corcoran, M. (2001). Family structure and children’s behavioral and cognitive outcomes. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 779–792.
Cavanagh, S., & Huston, A. (2006). Family instability and children’s early problem behavior. Social Forces, 85, 551–581.
Cavanagh, S., Schiller, K., & Riegle-Crumb, C. (2006). Marital transitions, parenting, and schooling: Exploring the link between family-structure history and adolescents’ academic status. Sociology of Education, 79, 329–354.
Chase-Landale, P. L., & Hetherington, E. M. (1990). The impact of divorce on life-span development: Short- and long-term effect. In D. L. Featherman & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Life-span development and behavior (pp. 105–150). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Cherlin, A. (1978). Remarriage as an incomplete institution. American Journal of Sociology, 84, 634–650.
Clark, R., & Nelson, S. (2000). Beyond the two-parent family. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, Los Angeles, CA.
Coleman, M., Ganong, L., & Fine, M. (2000). Reinvestigating remarriage: Another decade of progress. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 1288–1307.
Cooksey, E. C., Mott, F. L., & Neubauer, S. A. (2002). Friendships and early relationships: Links to sexual initiation among American adolescents born to young mothers. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 34, 118–126.
Davis, E. C., & Friel, L. V. (2001). Adolescent sexuality: Disentangling the effects of family structure and family context. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 669–681.
DeLeire, T., & Kalil, A. (2002). Good things come in threes: Single-Parent multigenerational family structure and adolescent adjustment. Demography, 39, 393–342.
Dunifon, R., & Kowalski-Jones, L. (2002). Who’s in the house? Race differences in cohabitation, single-parenthood, and child development. Child Development, 73, 1249–1264.
Durst, R. (1997). Ties that bind: Drafting enforceable cohabitation agreements. New Jersey Law Journal, 147, S13–S14.
Fields, J. (2001). Living arrangements of children. Current Population Reports P70–74. U.S. Census Bureau.
Fishman, B. (1983). The economic behavior of stepfamilies. Family Relations, 32, 359–366.
Garasky, S. (1995). The effects of family structure on educational attainment: Do the effects vary by the age of the child? American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 54, 89–105.
Graefe, D. R., & Lichter, D. (1999). Life course transitions of American children: Parental cohabitation, marriage, and single parenthood. Demography, 36, 205–217.
Hao, L., & Xie, G. (2001). The complexity of endogeneity of family structure in explaining children’s misbehavior. Social Science Research, 31, 1–28.
Hanson, T. L., McLanahan, S., & Thomson, E. (1997). Economic resources, parental practices, and children’s well-being. In G. J. Duncan & J. Brooks-Gunn (Eds.), Consequences of growing up poor (pp. 190–238). New York: Russell Sage Foundations.
Hetherington, E. (1989). Coping with family transitions: Winners, losers, and survivors. Child Development, 60, 1–14.
Hill, M., Yeung, W., & Duncan, G. (2001). Childhood family structure and young adult behaviors. Journal of Population Economics, 14, 271–299.
Hofferth, S., & Anderson, K. (2003). Are all dads equal? Biology versus marriage as a basis for paternal investment. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65, 213–232.
Katzev, A., Warner, R., & Acock, A. (1994). Girls or boys–relationship of child gender to marital instability. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 56, 89–100.
Krein, S. F., & Beller, A. H. (1988). Educational attainment of children from single-parent families: Differences by exposure, gender, and race. Demography, 25, 221–234.
Longmore, M. A., Manning, W. D., & Giordano, P. C. (2001). Preadolescent parenting strategies and teens’ dating and sexual initiation: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 322–335.
Mahoney, M. (2002). The economic rights and responsibilities of unmarried cohabitants. In A. Booth & A. Crouter (Eds.), Just living together: Implications of cohabitation on families, children, and social policy (pp. 247)–254). Mahwah New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Manning, W. (2002). The implications of cohabitation for children’s well-being. In A. Booth & A. C. Crouter (Eds.), Just living together: Implications for children, families, and public policy (pp. 121–152). Lawrence-Erlbaum
Manning, W., & Brown, S. (2006). Children’s economic well-being in married and cohabiting families. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 345–362.
Manning, W., & Bulanda, R. (2006). Cohabitation and family trajectories. In S. Hofferth & L. Casper (Eds.), Handbook of measurement issues in family research (pp. 199–219). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Manning, W., & Lamb, K. (2003). Adolescent well-being in cohabiting, married, and single-parent families. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65, 876–893.
Manning, W., & Landale, N. (1996). Racial and ethnic differences in the role of cohabitation in premarital childbearing. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 63–77.
Manning, W., Smock, P., & Majumdar, D. (2002). The relative stability of cohabiting and marital unions for children. Center for Family and Demographic Research Working Paper 2002−18.
McLanahan, S., & Booth, K. (1989). Mother-only families: Problems, prospects, and politics. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51, 557–580.
McLanahan, S., & Sandefur, G. (1994). Growing up with a single parent: What hurts, what helps. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
Moore, M. R., & Chase-Landale, P. L. (2001). Sexual intercourse and pregnancy among African American girls in high-poverty neighborhoods: The role of family and perceived community environment. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 1146–1157.
Morgan, S., Lye, D., & Condron, G. (1988). Sons, daughters and the risk of marital disruption. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 110–129.
Morrison, D. R. (1998). Child well-being in step families and cohabiting unions following divorce: A dynamic appraisal. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, Chicago.
Morrison, D. R. (2000). The costs of economic uncertainty: Child well being in cohabitating and remarried unions following parental divorce. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the Population Association of America, Los Angeles, CA.
Morrison, D. R., & Cherlin, A. J. (1995). The divorce process and young children’s well-being: A prospective analysis. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 800–812.
Nock, S. L. (1995). A comparison of marriages and cohabiting relationships. Journal of Family Issues, 16, 53–76.
Osborne, C., Manning, W., & Smock, P. (2007). Married and cohabiting parents, relationship stability: A focus on race and ethnicity. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65, 1345–1366.
Powell, M. A., & Parcel, T. L. (1997). Effects of family structure on the earnings attainment process: Differences by gender. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59, 419–433.
Raley, R. K., & Wildsmith, E. (2004). Cohabitation and children’s family instability. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 210–219.
Raley, R. K., Frisco, M., & Wildsmith, E. (2005). Maternal Cohabitation and Educational Success. Sociology of Education, 78, 144–164.
Rodgers, K. B., & Rose, H. A. (2002). Risk and resiliency factors among adolescents who experience marital transitions. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 1024–1037.
Sandefur, G. D., McLanahan, S., & Wojtkiewicz, R. A. (1992). The effects of parental marital status during adolescence on high school graduation. Social Forces, 71, 103–121.
Seff, M. (1995). Cohabitation and the law. Marriage and Family Review, 21, 141–168.
Smock, P. J. (2000). Cohabitation in the United States. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 1–20.
Smock, P. J., & Gupta, S. (2002). What is the role of cohabitation in contemporary North American family structure? In A. Booth & A. Crouter (Eds.), Just living together: Implications of cohabitation on families, children, and social policy (pp. 53–84). Mahwah New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Spruijt, E., & Goede, M. (1997). Transitions in family structure and adolescent well-being. Adolescence, 32, 897–911.
Thomson, E., McLanahan, S. S., & Curtin, R. B. (1992). Family structure, gender, and parental socialization. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 368–378.
Thomson, E., Hanson, T., & McLanahan, S. (1994). Family structure and child well-being: Economic resources vs. parental behavior. Social Forces, 73, 221–242.
Trivers, R. (1974). Parent-offspring conflict. American Zoologist, 14, 249–264.
U.S. Bureau of the Census (2001). http://www.census.gov/population/socdemo/hh-fam/tabUC-1.txt
Wiesensale, S., & Heckart, K. (1993). Domestic partnerships: A concept paper and policy discussion. Family Relations, 42, 199–204.
Wojtkiewicz, R. (1993). Simplicity and complexity in the effects of high school graduation. Demography, 30, 701–717.
Wu, L., & Martinson, B. (1993). Family structure and the risk of a premarital birth. American Sociological Review, 58, 210–232.
Wu, L., & Thomson, E. (2001). Race differences in family experience sexual initiation: Dynamic models of family structure and family change. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 63, 682–696.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported in part by the Center for Family and Demographic Research, Bowling Green State University which has core funding from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R21 HD042831-01). Paper presented at the annual Population Association of America meetings in May 2002 in Atlanta and the annual American Economic Association meetings January 2003 in Washington D.C. We appreciate the helpful comments provided by Susan Brown, Daniel Lichter, and Kelly Raley.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
Percent of respondents experience each adolescent outcome according to family structure experiences
Early age first sexa | Birth by 18 | High school graduate | |
---|---|---|---|
Ever married two biological parent | 10.6 | 6.3 | 85.1 |
Ever single mother | 16.3 | 12.5 | 75.9 |
Ever married stepparent | 15.0 | 11.4 | 78.3 |
Ever cohabiting two biological parent | 26.1 | 21.8 | 65.8 |
Ever cohabiting stepparent | 20.1 | 11.9 | 68.8 |
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bulanda, R.E., Manning, W.D. Parental Cohabitation Experiences and Adolescent Behavioral Outcomes. Popul Res Policy Rev 27, 593–618 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-008-9083-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-008-9083-8