Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Spatial and temporal patterns of root distribution in developing stands of four woody crop species grown with drip irrigation and fertilization

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In forest trees, roots mediate such significant carbon fluxes as primary production and soil CO2 efflux. Despite the central role of roots in these critical processes, information on root distribution during stand establishment is limited, yet must be described to accurately predict how various forest types, which are growing with a range of resource limitations, might respond to environmental change. This study reports root length density and biomass development in young stands of eastern cottonwood (Populus deltoidies Bartr.) and American sycamore (Platanus occidentalis L.) that have narrow, high resource site requirements, and compares them with sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua L.) and loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.), which have more robust site requirements. Fine roots (<1 mm), medium roots (1 to 5 mm) and coarse roots (>5 mm) were sampled to determine spatial distribution in response to fertilizer and irrigation treatments delivered through drip irrigation tubes. Root length density and biomass were predominately controlled by stand development, depth and proximity to drip tubes. After accounting for this spatial and temporal variation, there was a significant increase in RLD with fertilization and irrigation for all genotypes. The response to fertilization was greater than that of irrigation. Both fine and coarse roots responded positively to resources delivered through the drip tube, indicating a whole-root-system response to resource enrichment and not just a feeder root response. The plastic response to drip tube water and nutrient enrichment demonstrate the capability of root systems to respond to supply heterogeneity by increasing acquisition surface. Fine-root biomass, root density and specific root length were greater for broadleaved species than pine. Roots of all genotypes explored the rooting volume within 2 years, but this occurred faster and to higher root length densities in broadleaved species, indicating they had greater initial opportunity for resource acquisition than pine. Sweetgum’s root characteristics and its response to resource availability were similar to the other broadleaved species, despite its functional resemblance to pine regarding robust site requirements. It was concluded that genotypes, irrigation and fertilization significantly influenced tree root system development, which varied spatially in response to resource-supply heterogeneity created by drip tubes. Knowledge of spatial and temporal patterns of root distribution in these stands will be used to interpret nutrient acquisition and soil respiration measurements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

SRL:

specific root length

RLD:

root length density

C:

control treatment

I:

irrigation

F:

fertilization

IF:

irrigation plus fertilization

x :

horizontal distance from the tree parallel to the drip tube

y :

horizontal distance from the tree perpendicular to the drip tube

ST66:

eastern cottonwood clone from Issaquena County, MS, USA

S7C15:

eastern cottonwood clone from Brazos County, TX, USA

References

  • Adegbidi HG, Comerford NB, Jokela EJ, Barros NF (2004) Root development of young loblolly pine in spodosols in southeast Georgia. Soil Sci Soc Am J 68:596–604

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Axelsson E, Axelsson B (1986) Changes in carbon allocation patterns in spruce and pine trees following irrigation and fertilization. Tree Physiol 2:189–204

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bauhus J, Messier C (1999) Soil exploitation strategies of fine roots in different tree species of the southern boreal forest of eastern Canada. Can J For Res 29:260–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binkley D (1986) Forest nutrition management. Wiley, New York, p 290

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouillet JP, Laclau JP, Arnaud M, M’Bou AT, Saint-André L, Jourdan C (2002) Changes with age in the spatial distribution of roots of Eucalyptus clone in Congo – impact on water and nutrient uptake. For Ecol Manag 171:43–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyer JS (1985) Water transport. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 36:473–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt CM, Styles SW (1994) Drip and microirrigation for trees, vines, and row crops. ITRC, Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapin FS (1980) The mineral nutrition of wild plants. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 11:233–260

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chapin FS, Ruess RW (2001) Carbon cycle – the roots of the matter. Nature 411:749–752

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman MD, Dickson RE, Isebrands JG (2000) Contrasting fine-root production, survival and soil CO2 efflux in pine and poplar plantations. Plant Soil 225:129–139

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman MD, Coyle DR, Blake J, Britton K, Buford M, Campbell RG, Cox J, Cregg B, Daniels D, Jacobson M, Johnson K, McDonald T, McLeod K, Nelson E, Robison D, Rummer R, Sanchez F, Stanturf J, Stokes B, Trettin C, Tuskan J, Wright L, Wullschleger S (2004a) Production of short rotation woody crops grown with a range of nutrient and water availability: establishment report and first-year responses. USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Asheville, NC, USA, General Technical Report, SRS-72, p 21

  • Coleman MD, Friend AL, Kern CC (2004b) Carbon allocation and nitrogen acquisition in a developing Populus deltoides plantation. Tree Physiol 24:1347–1357

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Comas LH, Eissenstat DM (2004) Linking fine root traits to maximum potential growth rate among 11 mature temperate tree species. Funct Ecol 18:388–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connell MJ, Raison RJ, Khanna PK (1995) Nitrogen mineralization in relation to site history and soil properties for a range of Australian forest soils. Biol Fertil Soils 20:213–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coyle DR, Coleman MD (2005) Forest production responses to irrigation and fertilization are not explained by shifts in allocation. For Ecol Manag 208:137–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drexhage M, Chauvière M, Colin F, Nielsen CNN (1999) Development of structural root architecture and allometry of Quercus petraea. Can J For Res 29:600–608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einsmann JC, Jones RH, Mou P, Mitchell RJ (1999) Nutrient foraging traits in 10 co-occurring plant species of contrasting life forms. J Ecol 87:609–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enquist BJ, Niklas KJ (2002) Global allocation rules for patterns of biomass partitioning in seed plants. Science 295:1517–1520

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fabião A, Madeira M, Steen E, Kätterer T, Ribeiro C, Araújo C (1995) Development of root biomass in an Eucalyptus-globulus plantation under different water and nutrient regimes. Plant Soil 168–169:215–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitter AH (1991) The ecological significance of root system architecture: an economic approach. In: Atkinson D (ed) Plant root growth. An ecological perspective. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, pp 229–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Fredericksen TS, Zedaker SM (1995) Fine root biomass, distribution, and production in young pine-hardwood stands. New For 10:99–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Gale MR, Grigal DF (1987) Vertical root distributions of northern tree species in relation to successional status. Can J For Res 17:829–834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giardina CP, Ryan MG, Binkley D, Fownes JH (2003) Primary production and carbon allocation in relation to nutrient supply in a tropical experimental forest. Glob Chan Biol 9:1438–1450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gower ST, Vogt KA, Grier CC (1992) Carbon dynamics of Rocky Mountain Douglas-fir: influence of water and nutrient availability. Ecol Monogr 62:43–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harley JL, Smith SE (1983) Mycorrhizal symbiosis. Academic, New York, p 483

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington CA, DeBell DS (1996) Above- and below-ground characteristics associated with wind toppling in a young Populus plantation. Trees-structure and Function 11:109–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendrick RL, Pregitzer KS (1992) Spatial variation in tree root distribution and growth associated with minirhizotrons. Plant Soil 143:283–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendricks JJ, Nadelhoffer KJ, Aber JD (1993) Assessing the role of fine roots in carbon and nutrient cycling. Trends Ecol Evol 8:174–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodge A (2004) The plastic plant: root responses to heterogeneous supplies of nutrients. New Phytol 162:9–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes KA, Gandar PW (1993) Length densities, occupancies and weights of apple root systems. Plant Soil 148:211–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson RB, Canadell J, Ehleringer JR, Mooney HA, Sala OE, Schulze ED (1996) A global analysis of root distributions for terrestrial biomes. Oecologia 108:389–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jobbagy EG, Jackson RB (2001) The distribution of soil nutrients with depth: global patterns and the imprint of plants. Biogeochemistry 53:51–77

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson JD (1990) Dry-matter partitioning in loblolly and slash pine: effects of fertilization and irrigation. For Ecol Manag 30:147–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joslin JD, Wolfe MH, Hanson PJ (2000) Effects of altered water regimes on forest root systems. New Phytol 147:117–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kubiske ME, Pregitzer KS, Zak DR, Mikan CJ (1998) Growth and C allocation of Populus tremuloides genotypes in response to atmospheric CO2 and soil N availability. New Phytol 140:251–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landsberg JJ, Waring RH (1997) A generalised model of forest productivity using simplified concepts of radiation-use efficiency, carbon balance and partitioning. For Ecol Manag 95:209–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Littell RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WW, Wolfinger RD (2006) SAS for mixed models. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA, p 633

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo Y, Zhou X (2006) Soil respiration and the environment. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp xi, 316, [314] of plates

  • Luxmoore RJ, Cunningham M, Mann LK, Tjoelker MG (1993) Urea fertilization effects on nutrient uptake and growth of Platanus occidentalis during plantation establishment. Trees-structure and function 7:250–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyr H, Hoffmann G (1967) Growth rates and growth periodicity of roots. Int Rev For Res 2:181–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Majdi H (2001) Changes in fine root production and longevity in relation to water and nutrient availability in a Norway spruce stand in northern Sweden. Tree Physiol 21:1057–1061

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Misra RK, Turnbull CRA, Cromer RN, Gibbons AK, LaSala AV (1998) Below- and above-ground growth of Eucalyptus nitens in a young plantation. I. Biomass. For Ecol Manag 106:283–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mou P, Jones RH, Mitchell RJ, Zutter B (1995) Spatial-distribution of Roots in sweetgum and loblolly-pine monocultures and relations with aboveground biomass and soil nutrients. Funct Ecol 9:689–699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mou P, Mitchell RJ, Jones RH (1997) Root distribution of two tree species under a heterogeneous nutrient environment. J Appl Ecol 34:645–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nambiar EKS (1983) Root development and configuration in intensively managed radiata pine plantations. Plant Soil 71:37–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nye PH, Tinker PB (1977) Solute movement in the soil–root system. Blackwell, Oxford, p 342

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Grady AP, Worledge D, Battaglia M (2005) Temporal and spatial changes in fine root distributions in a young Eucalyptus globulus stand in southern Tasmania. For Ecol Manag 214:373–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patra AK, Jarvis SC, Hatch DJ (1999) Nitrogen mineralization in soil layers, soil particles and macro-organic matter under grassland. Biol Fertil Soils 29:38–45

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Persson H (1980) Fine-root dynamics in a Scots pine stand with and without near-optimum nutrient and water regimes. Acta Phytogeogr Suec 68:101–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponder HG, Gilliam CH, Evans CE (1984) Trickle irrigation of field-grown nursery stock based on net evaporation. Hortscience 19:304–306

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pregitzer KS, Zak DR, Maziasz J, DeForest J, Curtis PS, Lussenhop J (2000) Interactive effects of atmospheric CO2 and soil-N availability on fine roots of Populus tremuloides. Ecol Appl 10:18–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Pregitzer KS, DeForest JL, Burton AJ, Allen MF, Ruess RW, Hendrick RL (2002) Fine root architecture of nine North American trees. Ecol Monogr 72:293–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pronk AA, De Willigen P, Heuvelink E, Challa H (2002) Development of fine and coarse roots of Thuja occidentalis ‘Brabant’ in non-irrigated and drip irrigated field plots. Plant Soil 243:161–171

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reich PB, Walters MB, Tjoelker MG, Vanderklein D, Buschena C (1998) Photosynthesis and respiration rates depend on leaf and root morphology and nitrogen concentration in nine boreal tree species differing in relative growth rate. Funct Ecol 12:395–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds JF, Thornley JHM (1982) A shoot:root partioning model. Ann Bot 49:585–597

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson D (1994) The responses of plants to non-uniform supplies of nutrients. New Phytol 127:635–674

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers VA (1990) Soil survey of savannah river plant area, parts of Aiken, Barnwell, and Allendale counties, South Carolina. USDA Soil Conservation Service, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothe A, Binkley D (2001) Nutritional interactions in mixed species forests: a synthesis. Can J For Res 31:1855–1870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Sánchez MC, Plana V, Ortuño MF, Tapia LM, Abrisqueta JM (2005) Spatial root distribution of apricot trees in different soil tillage practices. Plant Soil 272:211–221

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan MG, Law BE (2005) Interpreting, measuring, and modeling soil respiration. Biogeochemistry 73:3–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart JB, Moran CJ, Wood JT (1999) Macropore sheath: quantification of plant root and soil macropore association. Plant Soil 211:59–67

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Trumbore S (2006) Carbon respired by terrestrial ecosystems – recent progress and challenges. Glob Chang Biol 12:141–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Miegroet H, Norby RJ, Tschaplinski TJ (1994) Nitrogen fertilization strategies in short-rotation sycamore. For Ecol Manag 64:13–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogt KA, Vogt DJ, Moore EE, Fatuga BA, Redlin MR, Edmonds RL (1987) Conifer and angiosperm fine-root biomass in relation to stand age and site productivity in Douglas-fir forests. J Ecol 75:857–870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waring RH, Schlesinger WH (1985) Forest ecosystems. Academic, Orlando, p 340

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolfolk WTM, Friend AL (2003) Growth response of cottonwood roots to varied NH4:NO3 ratios in enriched patches. Tree Physiol 23:427–432

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yanai RD, Fahey TJ, Miller SL (1995) Efficiency of nutrient acquisition by fine roots and mycorrhizae. In: Smith WK, Hinckley TM (eds) Resource physiology of conifers. Academic, San Diego, pp 75–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Zutter BR, Mitchell RJ, Glover GR, Gjerstad DH (1999) Root length and biomass in mixtures of broomsedge with loblolly pine or sweetgum. Can J For Res 29:926–933

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Funding was provided by the US Department of Energy-Savannah River Operations office through the USDA-Forest Service Savannah River and the Forest Service Southern Research Station under Interagency Agreement DE-IA09-76SR00056; Department of Energy Oak Ridge National Lab Interagency Agreement 00-IA-11330135-221; Southern Research Station Research Work Units 4103, 4104, 4154, 4155, 4505, 4703, and The Timber Company, Weyerhaeuser, Champion International and Union Camp. David Coyle and Doug Aubrey provided technical assistance and manuscript review. Thanks to the many project technicians and staff at the USFS-Savannah River Forest Station, The University of Georgia and Auburn University who made data collection possible. Helpful reviews were also provided by Alex Friend, Bernard Parresol, Felipe Sanchez, Alan Salmon and Ruth Yanai.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark Coleman.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Tibor Kalapos.

The US Government has the right to retain a nonexclusive, royalty-free license in and to any copyright covering this paper. Mention of a commercial or proprietary product does not constitute endorsement or recommendation by the USDA Forest Service.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Coleman, M. Spatial and temporal patterns of root distribution in developing stands of four woody crop species grown with drip irrigation and fertilization. Plant Soil 299, 195–213 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-007-9375-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-007-9375-5

Keywords

Navigation