Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Radiological features for the approach in trans-sphenoidal pituitary surgery

  • Published:
Pituitary Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

In order to perform trans-sphenoidal endoscopic pituitary surgery safely and efficiently it is important to identify anatomical and pituitary disease features on the pre-operative CT and MRI scans; thereby minimising the risk to surrounding structures and optimising outcomes. We aim to create a checklist to streamline pre-operative planning.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed pre-operative CT and MRI scans of 100 adults undergoing trans-sphenoidal endoscopic pituitary surgery.

Results

Radiological findings and their incidence included deviated nasal septum (62%), concha bullosa (32%), bony dehiscence of the carotid arteries (18%), sphenoid septation overlying the internal carotid artery (24% at the sella) and low lying CSF (32%). The mean distance of the sphenoid ostium to the skull base was 10 mm (range 2.7–17.6 mm). We also describe the ‘teddy bear’ sign which when present on an axial CT indicates the carotid arteries will be identifiable intra-operatively.

Conclusions

There are significant variations in the anatomical and pituitary disease features between patients. We describe a number of features on pre-operative scans and have devised a checklist including a new ‘teddy bear’ sign to aid the surgeon in the anatomical assessment of patients undergoing trans-sphenoidal pituitary surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cappabianca P, de Divitiis E (2004) Endoscopy and transsphenoidal surgery. Neurosurgery 54(5):1048–1050

    Google Scholar 

  2. Famini P, Maya MM, Melmed S (2011) Pituitary magnetic resonance imaging for Sellar and Parasellar masses: ten-year experience in 2598 patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 96(6):1633–1641

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Sethi DS, Stanley RE, Pillay PK (1995) Endoscopic anatomy of the sphenoid sinus and sella turcica. J Laryngol Otol 905:951–955

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mascarella MA, Forghani R, Sirhan D, Di Maio S, Mohr G, Zeitoni AG, Tewfik MA (2014) Analysis of potential determinants of a reduced intercarotid distance in patients undergoing endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 151(1 Suppl):111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim YH, Kim JE, Kim MJ, Cho JH (2013) New landmark for the endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach of pituitary surgery. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 53:218–222

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Wei LF, Zhang J, Chen HJ, Wang R (2013) Value of anatomical landmarks in single-nostril endonasal transnasal-sphenoidal surgery. Exp Ther Med 5:1057–1062

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Liu S, Wang Z, Zhou B, Yang B, Fan E, Li Y (2002) Related structures of the lateral sphenoid wall anatomy studies in CT and MRI. [in Chinese] Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhu 16:407–409

    Google Scholar 

  8. Banna M, Olutola PS (1983) Patterns of pneumatization and septation of the sphenoidal sinus. J Can Assoc Radiol 34:291–293

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Szolar D, Preidler K, Ranner G et al (1994) The sphenoid sinus during childhood: establishment of normal developmental standards by MRI. Surg Radiol Anat 16:193–198

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hamid O, El Fiky L, Hassan O, Kotb A, El Fiky S (2008) Anatomic variations of the sphenoid sinus and their impact on trans-sphenoid pituitary surgery. Skull Base 18(1):9–15

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Hatipoglu HG, Cetin MA, Selvi A, Yuksel E (2009) Role of magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating sphenoid sinus and internal carotid artery. J Larynogol Otol 123:1331–1337

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Viera JO Jr, Cukiert, Liberman B (2004) Magnetic resonance imaging of cavernous sinus invasion by pituitary adenoma diagnostic criteria and surgical findings. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 62(2B):437–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Scotti G, Yu CY, Dillon WP, Norman D, Colombo N, Newton TH, De Groot J, Wilson CB (1988) MR Imaging of cavernous sinus involvement by pituitary adenomas. AJNR 151:799–806

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Knosp E, Steiner E, Kitz K, Matula C (1993) Pituitary adenomas with invasion of the CS space: a magnetic resonance imaging classification compared with surgical findings. Neurosurgery 33:610–618

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cottier JP, Destrieux C, Brunereau L et al (2000) CSI by pituitary adenoma: MR imaging. Radiology 215:463–469

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Victoria Twigg.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None declared.

Ethics approval

Not required.

Informed consent

Not required as retrospective study of anonymous images.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Twigg, V., Carr, S.D., Balakumar, R. et al. Radiological features for the approach in trans-sphenoidal pituitary surgery. Pituitary 20, 395–402 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-017-0787-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-017-0787-9

Keywords

Navigation