Skip to main content
Log in

Pituitary incidentalomas: analysis of a neuroradiological cohort

  • Published:
Pituitary Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Most pituitary lesions are detected during the investigation of symptoms associated with hormonal dysfunction and vision abnormalities. When the lesion is identified in an image performed for reasons not related to the tumor, the term incidentaloma applies. Our aim was to describe the diagnosis behind pituitary incidentalomas, patient characteristics and their follow up.

Methods

We searched for the terms «pituitary», «hypophysis» and «incidentaloma» in the requisitions and reports of all CTs and MRIs performed between 1st September 2008 and 30th October 2013. We retrieved demographic data as well as information regarding presentation and follow-up.

Results

We detected 71 pituitary incidentalomas, 3 in children/adolescents. In adult patients, mean age was 51.6 ± 18.46 years and 42 were female (61.8 %). The most frequent reason for imaging was headache (33.8 %). The image that first detected the incidentaloma was CT scan in 63.2 and 17.6 % patients presented symptoms that could have led to earlier diagnosis. Pituitary adenoma is the most prevalent lesion (n 48; 70.6 %), followed by Rathke’s cleft cyst (n 9; 13.2 %). Hormonal evaluation revealed hypopituitarism in 14 patients and hypersecretion in 6: 5 prolactinomas and 1 somatotroph adenoma. Twenty-one (28.8 %) patients underwent surgery and there was no malignancy.

Conclusions

In concordance with available literature, adenomas are the most frequent incidentally found pituitary lesions. Hormonal dysfunction is quite prevalent, including symptomatic presentations, which suggests that there seems to be a low sensitivity for the diagnosis of pituitary disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Soule SG, Jacobs HS (1996) The evaluation and management of subclinical pituitary disease. Postgrad Med J 72:258–262

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Costello RT (1936) Subclinical adenoma of the pituitary gland. Am J Pathol 12(2):205–216

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Teramoto A, Hirakawa K, Sanno N, Osamura Y (1994) Incidental pituitary lesions in 1000 unselected autopsy specimens. Radiology 193:161–164

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Molitch ME (2009) Pituitary incidentalomas. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 23:667–675

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Freda PU, Beckers AM, Katznelson L et al (2011) Pituitary incidentaloma: an Endocrine Society Clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 96:894–904

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Scangas GA, Laws ER (2014) Pituitary incidentalomas. Pituitary 17(5):486–491

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fainstein Day P, Guitelman M, Artese R et al (2004) Retrospective multicentric study of pituitary incidentalomas. Pituitary 7(3):145–153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sanno N, Oyama K, Tahara S, Teramoto A, Kato Y (2003) A survey of pituitary incidentaloma in Japan. Eur J Endocrinol 149:123–127

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Donovan LE, Corenblum B (1995) The natural history of the pituitary incidentaloma. Arch Intern Med 155(2):181–184

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Daly AF, Burlacu MC, Livadariu E, Beckers A (2007) The epidemiology and management of pituitary incidentalomas. Horm Res 68(suppl 5):195–203

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kreitschmann-Andermahr I, Siegel S, Weber Carneiro R et al (2013) Headache and pituitary disease: a systematic review. Clin Endocrinol 79:760–769

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Famini P, Maya MM, Melmed S (2011) Pituitary magnetic resonance imaging for sellar and parasellar masses. Ten-year experience in 2598 Patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 96(6):163–1641

    Google Scholar 

  13. Igarashi T, Saeki N, Yamaura A (1999) 1999 Long-term magnetic resonance imaging follow-up of asymptomatic sellar tumors—their natural history and surgical indications. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 39:592–598

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Dekkers OM, Hammer S, de Keizer RJ et al (2007) The natural course of nonfunctioning pituitary macroadenomas. Eur J Endocrinol 156:217–224

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Karavitaki N, Collison K, Halliday J et al (2007) What is the natural history of nonoperated nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas? Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 67:938–943

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Steiner TJ, Stovner LJ, Katsarava Z et al (2014) The impact of headache in Europe: principal results of the Eurolight project. J Headache Pain 15(1):31

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Vernooij MW, Ikram A, Tanghe HL et al (2007) Incidental findings on brain MRI in the general population. N Engl J Med 357:1821–1828

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to César Esteves.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Esteves, C., Neves, C., Augusto, L. et al. Pituitary incidentalomas: analysis of a neuroradiological cohort. Pituitary 18, 777–781 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-015-0652-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-015-0652-7

Keywords

Navigation