Skip to main content
Log in

Kim Against Dualism

  • Published:
Philosophical Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents and evaluates Jaegwon Kim’s recent argument against substance dualism. The argument runs as follows. Causal interaction between two entities requires pairing relations. Pairing relations are spatial relations, such as distance and orientation. Souls are supposedly nonspatial, immaterial substances. So it is hard to see how souls could enter into paired causal relations with material substances. I show that Kim’s argument against dualism fails. I conclude by sketching a way the substance dualist could meet Kim’s central challenge of explaining how souls and bodies are uniquely paired, allowing for them to enter into specific causal relationships, forming a singular soul–body unit.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • P. Churchland (1986) Neurophilosophy MIT Press Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Corcoran (Eds) (2001) Soul, Body and Survival: Essays in the Metaphysics of Human Persons Cornell University Press Ithaca, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster J. (1992). The Immaterial Self, Routledge Press.

  • Heil, J. (1998): Philosophy of Mind: A Contemporary Introduction, Routledge Press.

  • J. Heil (2003) From an Ontological Point of View Oxford University Press New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • E.J. Lowe (1998) The Possibility of Metaphysics Oxford University Press Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • E.J. Lowe (2003) A Survey of Metaphysics Oxford University Press Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Kenny (1968) Descartes Random House New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. (2001): ‘Lonely Souls: Causality and Substance Dualism’, in K. Corcoran (ed.), Soul, Body and Survival: Essays in the Metaphysics of Human Persons, Ithaca: Cornell Press, 2001.

  • M. Kafatos R. Nadeau (2001) The Non-Local Universe Oxford University Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • C.B. Martin (1992) ‘Power for Realists’ J. Bacon K. Campbell L. Reinhardt (Eds) Ontology, Causality and Mind Cambridge University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, T. (2000): ‘Causality, Mind, and Free Will’, in J. Tomberlin (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives 14: Action and Freedom.

  • Unger, P. All The Power in the World, Oxford: Oxford University Press (Forthcoming).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Jehle.

Additional information

“Thanks to Neal Judisch, Dean Zimmerman, Max Goss, Robert O’Connor, John Heil, Sloan Lee, Daniel Howard-Snyder, Carl Ginet, and Deborah Smith for helpful comments. Thanks also to the audience at the Ohio Philosophical Association Annual Meeting 2004 for helpful comments and suggestions.”

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jehle, D. Kim Against Dualism. Philos Stud 130, 565–578 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-004-6426-0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-004-6426-0

Keywords

Navigation