Abstract
This paper presents and evaluates Jaegwon Kim’s recent argument against substance dualism. The argument runs as follows. Causal interaction between two entities requires pairing relations. Pairing relations are spatial relations, such as distance and orientation. Souls are supposedly nonspatial, immaterial substances. So it is hard to see how souls could enter into paired causal relations with material substances. I show that Kim’s argument against dualism fails. I conclude by sketching a way the substance dualist could meet Kim’s central challenge of explaining how souls and bodies are uniquely paired, allowing for them to enter into specific causal relationships, forming a singular soul–body unit.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
P. Churchland (1986) Neurophilosophy MIT Press Cambridge, MA
K. Corcoran (Eds) (2001) Soul, Body and Survival: Essays in the Metaphysics of Human Persons Cornell University Press Ithaca, NY
Foster J. (1992). The Immaterial Self, Routledge Press.
Heil, J. (1998): Philosophy of Mind: A Contemporary Introduction, Routledge Press.
J. Heil (2003) From an Ontological Point of View Oxford University Press New York, NY
E.J. Lowe (1998) The Possibility of Metaphysics Oxford University Press Oxford, UK
E.J. Lowe (2003) A Survey of Metaphysics Oxford University Press Oxford, UK
A. Kenny (1968) Descartes Random House New York
Kim, J. (2001): ‘Lonely Souls: Causality and Substance Dualism’, in K. Corcoran (ed.), Soul, Body and Survival: Essays in the Metaphysics of Human Persons, Ithaca: Cornell Press, 2001.
M. Kafatos R. Nadeau (2001) The Non-Local Universe Oxford University Press Oxford
C.B. Martin (1992) ‘Power for Realists’ J. Bacon K. Campbell L. Reinhardt (Eds) Ontology, Causality and Mind Cambridge University Press Cambridge
O’Connor, T. (2000): ‘Causality, Mind, and Free Will’, in J. Tomberlin (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives 14: Action and Freedom.
Unger, P. All The Power in the World, Oxford: Oxford University Press (Forthcoming).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
“Thanks to Neal Judisch, Dean Zimmerman, Max Goss, Robert O’Connor, John Heil, Sloan Lee, Daniel Howard-Snyder, Carl Ginet, and Deborah Smith for helpful comments. Thanks also to the audience at the Ohio Philosophical Association Annual Meeting 2004 for helpful comments and suggestions.”
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jehle, D. Kim Against Dualism. Philos Stud 130, 565–578 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-004-6426-0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-004-6426-0