Skip to main content
Log in

A new predictor–corrector method for optimal power flow

  • Published:
Optimization and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A predictor–corrector interior-point method is developed in order to deal with the AC active and reactive optimal power flow problem. Voltage rectangular coordinates are adopted instead of polar ones, since they allow nonlinear corrections for the primal and dual feasibility conditions and not only for the complementary constraints as in the traditional nonlinear programming methods. A new heuristic is proposed to handle voltage magnitude constraints. Computational experiments for IEEE test systems and a real Brazilian system are presented and show the advantages of the proposed approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Castillo A, O’Neill RP (2013) Computational performance of solution techniques applied to the ACOPF. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Optimal Power Flow Paper 5

  • Cain MB, O’Neill RP, Castillo A (2012) History of optimal power flow and formulations. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Optimal Power Flow Paper 1

  • Carpentier J (1962) Contribution a l’etude du dispatching economique. Bulletin de la Societe Francaise des Electriciens 3:431–447

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Bakry AS, Tapia RA, Tsuchiya T, Zhang Y (1996) On the formulation and the theory of the Newton interior-point method for nonlinear programming. J Optim Theory Appl 89:507–541

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Garzillo A, Innorta M, Ricci R (1999) The flexibility of interior point based power flow algorithms facing critical network situations. Electr Power Energy Syst 21:579–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huneault M, Galiana FD (1991) A survey of the optimal power flow literature. IEEE Trans Power Syst 6(2):762–770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang Q, Geng G, Guo C, Cao Y (2010) An efficient implementation of automatic differentiation in interior point optimal power flow. IEEE Trans Power Syst 25(1):147–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang QY, Chiang HD, Guo CX, Cao YJ (2009) Power-current hybrid rectangular formulation for interior-point optimal power flow. IET Gener Trans Distrib 3(8):748–756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karmarkar N (1984) A new polynomial-time algorithm for linear programming. Combinatorica 4(4):373–395

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lavaei J, Low SH (2012) Zero duality gap in optimal power flow problem. IEEE Trans Power Syst 27(1):92–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin WM, Huang CH, Zhan TS (2008) A hybrid current-power optimal power flow technique. IEEE Trans Power Syst 23(1):177–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehrotra S (1992) On the implementation of a primal-dual interior point method. SIAM J Optim 2(4):575–601

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Momoh JA, El-Hawary ME, Adapa R (1999) A review of selected optimal power flow literature to 1993, part I: Nonlinear and quadratic programming approaches. IEEE Trans Power Syst 14(1):96–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Momoh JA, El-Hawary ME, Adapa R (1999) A review of selected optimal power flow literature to 1993, part II: Newton, linear programming and interior point methods. IEEE Trans Power Syst 14(1):105–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Momoh JA (2001) Electric power system applications of optimization. Marcel Dekker, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Monticelli AJ (1983) Fluxo de Carga Em Redes de Energia Elétrica. Edgar Blucher, São Paulo

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandya KS, Joshi SK (2008) A survey of optimal power flow methods. J Theor Applied Inf Technol 4(5):450–458

    Google Scholar 

  • Quintana VH, Torres GL, Medina-Palomo J (2000) Interior point methods and their applications to power systems: a classification of publications and software codes. IEEE Trans Power Syst 15(1):170–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torres GL, Quintana VH (1998) An interior-point method for nonlinear optimal power flow using voltage rectangular coordinates. IEEE Trans Power Syst 13:1211–1218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torres GL, Quintana VH (2000) Optimal power flow by a nonlinear complementarity method. IEEE Trans Power Syst 15(3):1028–1033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Murillo-Sanchez CE, Zimmerman RD, Thomas RJ (2007) On computational issues of market-based optimal power flow. IEEE Trans Power Syst 22(3):1185–1193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright SJ (1996) Primal-dual interior-point methods. SIAM Publications, Philadelphia

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roy Wilhelm Probst.

Additional information

This research was partially sponsored by the Foundation for the Support of Research of the State of São Paulo (FAPESP) and the Brazilian Council for the Development of Science and Technology (CNPq).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Probst, R.W., Oliveira, A.R.L. A new predictor–corrector method for optimal power flow. Optim Eng 16, 335–346 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11081-014-9265-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11081-014-9265-7

Keywords

Navigation