Abstract
What influences residents’ vulnerability to flood hazards in a Canadian coastal city? This study addresses the question by identifying and testing hypothetical determinants of residential vulnerability to flood hazards in Metro Vancouver. A household survey is conducted in four neighbourhoods in Vancouver and Surrey to test seven determinants: (1) social vulnerability, (2) hazard perception, (3) institutional arrangements, (4) amenity value conflicts, (5) self-protection, (6) attribution of responsibility, and (7) attenuation of risk due to another dominating concern. Survey findings offer insights into how these determinants interact to produce unequal vulnerability to flood hazards among residents in a Canadian city. The study finds that social vulnerability is an important factor in determining overall vulnerability to flood hazards. Household income, as a key contributor to social vulnerability, is found to have significant correlations with variables that define the other determinants. Institutional arrangements, including property insurance and development regulations, appear to interact with social vulnerability and the other determinants to allow powerful groups of people to live in hazardous places without taking on the full associated risk. The findings of the study have implications for our understanding of how vulnerability is produced and how, or whether, local policy can address these factors to equitably reduce risk.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Burby R (2006) Hurricane Katrina and the paradoxes of government disaster policy: Bringing about wise governmental decisions for hazardous areas. Ann Am Acad Polit Soc Sci 604:171–191
Burton I, Kates RW, White GF (1978) The environment as hazard. Oxford University Press, New York
City of Surrey (1993) [Updated to 2014] City of Surrey Zoning By-law, 1993, No. 12000. Adopted September 13, 1993; Updated to June 23, 2014. Accessed from http://www.surrey.ca/bylawsandcouncillibrary/BYL_Zoning_12000.pdf
City of Surrey (1996) [Updated to 2014] City of Surrey Official Community Plan By-law, 1996, No. 12900. Adopted October 8, 1996; Updated to June 23, 2014. Accessed from http://www.surrey.ca/bylawsandcouncillibrary/REG_OCP_12900.pdf
City of Surrey (2013) Climate adaptation strategy. Accessed from http://www.surrey.ca/files/Climate_Adaptation_Strategy_-_FINAL.pdf
City of Vancouver (2012) Climate change adaptation strategy. Accessed from http://vancouver.ca/files/cov/Vancouver-Climate-Change-Adaptation-Strategy-2012-11-07.pdf
Collins TW (2005) Households, forests, and fire hazard vulnerability in the American West: a case study of a California community. Environ Hazards 6:23–37
Collins TW (2008a) What influences hazard mitigation? Household decision making about wildfire risks in Arizona’s White Mountains. Prof Geogr 60(4):508–526
Collins TW (2008b) The political ecology of hazard vulnerability: marginalization, facilitation and the production of differential risk to urban wildfires in Arizona’s White Mountains. J Polit Ecol 15:21–43
Collins TW (2009a) Influences on wildfire hazard exposure in Arizona’s High Country. Soc Nat Resour 22:211–229
Collins TW (2009b) The production of unequal risk in hazardscapes: an explanatory frame applied to disaster at the US–Mexico border. Geoforum 40:589–601
Dillman DA, Smyth JD, Christian LM (2009) Internet, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: the tailored design method, 3rd edn. Wiley, Hoboken
Friesinger S, Bernatchez P (2010) Perceptions of Gulf of St. Lawrence coastal communities confronting environmental change: hazards and adaptation, Quebec, Canada. Ocean Coast Manag 53:669–678
Grothmann T, Reusswig F (2006) People at risk of flooding: why some residents take precautionary action while others do not. Nat Hazards 38(1):101–120
Hewitt K (1983) The idea of calamity in a technocratic age. In: Hewitt K (ed) Interpretations of calamity from the viewpoint of human ecology. Allen & Unwin Inc, Boston, pp 3–32
Kasperson JX, Kasperson RE, Pidgeon N, Slovic P (2003) The social amplification of risk: assessing fifteen years of research and theory. In: Pidgeon N, Kasperson RE, Slovic P (eds) The social amplification of risk, vol 1. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 13–46
Kellens W, Zaalberg R, Neutens T, Vanneuville W, De Maeyer P (2011) An analysis of the public perception of flood risk on the Belgian Coast. Risk Anal 31(7):1055–1068
Kellens W, Terpstra T, De Maeyer P (2013) Perception and communication of flood risks: a systematic review of empirical research. Risk Anal 33(1):24–49
Keller C, Siegrist M, Gutscher H (2006) The role of the affect and availability heuristics in risk communication. Risk Anal 26(3):631–639
Kreibich H, Thieken AH, Grunenberg H, Ullrich K, Sommer T (2009) Extent, perception and mitigation of damage due to high groundwater levels in the city of Dresden, Germany. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 9(4):1247–1258
Kreutzwiser R, Woodly I, Shrubsole D (1994) Perceptions of flood hazards and floodplain regulations in Glen Williams, Ontario. Can Water Resour J 19:115–124
Lara A, Sauri D, Ribas A, Pavon D (2010) Social perceptions of floods and flood management in a Mediterranean area (Costa Brava, Spain). Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 10:2081–2091
Lindell MK, Hwang SN (2008) Households’ perceived personal risk and responses in a multihazard environment. Risk Anal 28(2):539–556
Lindell MK, Perry RW (2000) Household adjustment to earthquake hazard: a review of research. Environ Behav 32:590–630
Marmot M, Wilkinson RG (eds) (2006) Social determinants of health. Oxford University Press, New York
Martin WE, Martin IM, Kent B (2009) The role of risk perceptions in the risk mitigation process: the case of wildfire in high risk communities. J Environ Manage 91:489–498
Oulahen G (2015) Flood insurance in Canada: implications for flood management and residential vulnerability to flood hazards. Environ Manag 55(3):603–615
Oulahen G, Mortsch L, Tang K, Harford D (2015) Unequal vulnerability to flood hazards: “Ground truthing” a social vulnerability index of five municipalities in metro Vancouver, Canada. Ann Assoc Am Geogr. doi:10.1080/00045608.2015.1012634
Pelling M (2011) Adaptation to climate change: from resilience to transformation. Routledge, London
Sandink D, Kovacs P, Oulahen G, McGillivray G (2010) Making flood insurable for Canadian homeowners: a discussion paper. Institute for Catastrophic Loss Reduction & Swiss Reinsurance Company Ltd, Toronto
Shrubsole D, Green M, Scherer J (1997) The actual and perceived effects of floodplain land use regulations on property values in London, Ontario. Can Geogr 41:166–178
Siegrist M, Gutscher H (2006) Flooding risks: a comparison of lay people’s perceptions and expert’s assessments in Switzerland. Risk Anal 26(4):971–979
Slovic P (1992) Perception of risk: reflections on the psychometric paradigm. In: Krimsky S, Golding D (eds) Social theories of risk, vol 5. Praeger, Westport, pp 117–152
Statistics Canada (2011) Profile of dissemination areas for census and National Household Survey (NHS). Using Computing in the Humanities and Social Sciences (CHASS) at University of Toronto (distributor). http://datacentre.chass.utoronto.ca/cgi-bin/census/2011nhs/displayCensus.cgi?year=2011&geo=da. Accessed 2 April 2015
Terpstra T (2011) Emotions, trust, and perceived risk: affective and cognitive routes to flood preparedness behaviour. Risk Anal 31(10):1658–1675
Terpstra T, Gutteling JM (2008) Households’ perceived responsibilities in flood risk management in the Netherlands. Water Resour Dev 24(4):555–565
Terpstra T, Gutteling JM, Geldof GD, Kappe LJ (2006) The perception of flood risk and water nuisance. Water Sci Technol 54(6–7):431–439
The Canadian Press (2014) Deadly train disaster still haunts people of Lac-Megantic. http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/deadly-train-disaster-still-haunts-people-of-lac-m%C3%A9gantic-1.2694151. Accessed 2 July 2014
Thieken AH, Petrow T, Kreibich H, Merz B (2006) Insurability and mitigation of flood losses in private households in Germany. Risk Anal 26(2):383–395
Thieken AH, Kreibich H, Muller M, Merz B (2007) Coping with floods: preparedness, response and recovery of flood-affected residents in Germany in 2002. Hydrol Sci J 52(5):1016–1037
Wisner B, Blaikie P, Cannon T, Davis I (2004) At risk: natural hazards, people’s vulnerability, and disasters, 2nd edn. Routledge, New York
Zhai GF, Sato T, Fukuzono T, Ikeda S, Yoshida K (2006) Willingness to pay for flood risk reduction and its determinants in Japan. J Am Water Resour As 42(4):927–940
Zhang Y, Hwang SN, Lindell MK (2010) Hazard proximity or risk perception? Evaluating effects of natural and technological hazards on housing values. Environ Behav 42(5):597–624
Acknowledgements
We wish to thank the Vancouver and Surrey residents who participated in this study and the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on an earlier draft of the manuscript. The study was conducted as part of the Coastal Cities at Risk project, funded by the International Research Initiative on Adaptation to Climate Change (IRIACC). Managed by the International Development Research Centre (IDRC), IRIACC is the result of a unique funding collaboration between IDRC, the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC), the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. SSHRC also provided doctoral fellowship funding to the first author.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Oulahen, G., Shrubsole, D. & McBean, G. Determinants of residential vulnerability to flood hazards in Metro Vancouver, Canada. Nat Hazards 78, 939–956 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1751-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1751-5