Abstract
This paper addresses certain misconceptions regarding what is known and what may be expected when performing sensitivity analyses of network user equilibrium flow patterns. Our presentation relies on a simple observation: any given user equilibrium sensitivity analysis technique should be employed only when the regularity conditions on which it is based are satisfied. Violating regularity, as we show through previously published numerical examples, as well as new examples presented here for the first time, may well lead to incorrect results when the Tobin-Friesz sensitivity analysis method is applied. This is especially so when the most critical regularity assumption of the Tobin-Friesz method, namely that the unperturbed solution must be a nondegenerate extreme point, is violated. We also illustrate how a degenerate unperturbed solution may sometimes be modified to obtain an appropriate nondegenerate solution, thereby allowing the Tobin-Friesz method to be applied.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bell MGH, Iida Y (1997) Transportation network analysis. Wiley, New Jersey
Cho H, Smith T, Friesz TL (2000) A reduction method for local sensitivity analyses of network equilibrium arc flows. Transp Res Part B 34:31–51
Dafermos S (1988) Sensitivity analysis in variational inequalities. Math Oper Res 13:421–434
Davis G (1994) Exact local solution of the continuous network design problem via stochastic user equilibrium assignment. Transp Res Part B 28:61–75
Fiacco A (1983) Introduction to sensitivity and stability analysis in nonlinear programming. Academic, New York
Friesz TL, Tobin R, Cho H, Mehta N (1990) Sensitivity analysis based heuristic algorithms for mathematical programs with variational inequality constraints. Math Program 48:265–284
Josefsson M, Patriksson M (2007) Sensitivity analysis of separable traffic equilibrium equilibria with application to bilevel optimization in network design. Transp Res Part B 41:4–31
Kyparisis J (1987) Sensitivity analysis framework for variational inequalities. Math Program 38:203–213
Lu S (2008) Sensitivity of static traffic user equilibria with perturbations in arc cost function and travel demand. Transp Sci 42:105–123
Marcotte P, Patriksson M (2007) Handbooks in operations research and management science: transportation. In: Barnhart C, Laporte G (eds) Traffic equilibrium. Elsevier, Netherlands, pp 623–714
Patriksson M (2004) Sensitivity analysis of traffic equilibria. Transp Sci 38:258–281
Patriksson M, Rockafellar R (2003) Sensitivity analysis of aggregated variational inequality problems with application to traffic equilibria. Transp Sci 37:56–68
Qiu Y, Magnanti T (1989) Sensitivity analysis for variational inequalities defined on polyhedral sets. Math Oper Res 14:410–432
Robinson SM (2006) Strong regularity and the sensitivity analysis of traffic equilibria: a comment. Transp Sci 40:540–542
Tobin RL (1986) Sensitivity analysis for variational inequalities. J Optim Theory Appl 48:191–204
Tobin RL, Friesz TL (1988) Sensitivity analysis for equilibrium network flow. Transp Sci 22:242–250
Yang H (1997) Sensitivity analysis for the elastic-demand network equilibrium problem with applications. Transp Res Part B 31:55–70
Yang H, Bell M (2007) Sensitivity analysis of network traffic equilibria revisited: the corrected approach. In: Heydecker BG (ed) Mathematics in transport. Elsevier, Netherlands, pp 373–395
Yang H, Huang H (2005) Mathematical and economic theory of road pricing. Elsevier, Netherlands
Yang H, Meng Q, Bell M (2001) Simultaneous estimation of the origin–destination matrices and travel-cost coefficient for congested networks in a stochastic user equilibrium. Transp Sci 35:107–123
Ying J, Yang H (2005) Sensitivity analysis of stochastic user equilibrium flows in a bi-modal network with application to optimal pricing. Transp Res Part B 39:769–795
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chung, B.D., Cho, HJ., Friesz, T.L. et al. Sensitivity Analysis of User Equilibrium Flows Revisited. Netw Spat Econ 14, 183–207 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067-013-9215-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067-013-9215-5