Abstract
In this study, we propose that pooling resources would reduce both the carbon footprint and economic costsin the vehicle routing problem with time windows. A mathematical formulation for the vehicle routing problem considering the carbon footprint as a constraint is proposed. The model is approached with the scatter search metaheuristic and analyzed from the perspective of game theory to evaluate the stability of the coalition after pooling. We define a theoretical case for four suppliers on an instance partition from Solomon’s library using several scenarios from individual participation to a full coalition. For each of these scenarios, we realize a sweep of the objective space. The results show that the more resources are shared, the greater the benefit. The best savings and contributions are achieved by operating in complete cooperation. These savings were distributed as fairly as possible to maintain a stable coalition using the Shapley value.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ballot, E., & Fontane, F. (2010). Reducing transportation CO2 emissions through pooling of supply networks: perspectives from a case study in French retail chains. Production Planning & Control, 21(6), 640–650.
Bektaş, T., & Laporte, G. (2011). The pollution-routing problem. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 45(8), 1232–1250.
Belfiore, P., & Yoshida Yoshizaki, H.T. (2009). Scatter search for a real-life heterogeneous fleet vehicle routing problem with time windows and split deliveries in Brazil. European Journal of Operational Research, 199(3), 750–758.
Bogner, J., Pipatti, R., Hashimoto, S., Diaz, C., Mareckova, K., Diaz, L., & et al. (2008). Mitigation of global greenhouse gas emissions from waste: conclusions and strategies from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report. Working Group III (Mitigation). Waste Management & Research, 26(1), 11–32. doi:10.1177/0734242X07088433.
Ćirović, G., Pamučar, D., & Božanić, D. (2014). Green logistic vehicle routing problem: routing light delivery vehicles in urban areas using a neuro-fuzzy model. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(9), 4245–4258. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2014.01.005.
Corberan, A., Fernandez, E., Laguna, M., & Marti, R. (2002). Heuristic solutions to the problem of routing school buses with multiple objectives. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 53(4), 427–435.
Demir, E., Bektaş, T., & Laporte, G. (2014). The bi-objective pollution-routing problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 232(3), 464–478. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2013.08.002.
EcoTransIT World: Ecological Transport Information Tool for Worldwide Transports. (2010). http://www.ecotransit.org/download/EcoTransIT_World_Methodology_Data_100521.pdf. Accessed 17 Apr 2015.
Erdogan, S., & Miller-Hooks, E. (2012). A green vehicle routing problem. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 48(1), 100–114.
Figliozzi, M. (2010). Vehicle routing problem for emissions minimization. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2197, 1–7.
Frota Neto, J.Q., Bloemhof-Ruwaard, J.M., Van Nunen, J., & Van Heck, E. (2008). Designing and evaluating sustainable logistics networks. International Journal of Production Economics, 111(2), 195–208.
Georgiadis, P., & Vlachos, D. (2004). The effect of environmental parameters on product recovery. European Journal of Operational Research, 157(2), 449–464.
World Business Council for Sustainable Development, World Resources Institute. (2008). The greenhouse gas protocol. A corporate accounting and reporting standard. Geneva, Switzerland: World Business Council for Sustainable Development; Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
Glover, F. (1998). A template for scatter search and path relinking. Artificial Evolution: Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1363, 1–51.
Gore, A., Guggenheim, D., David, L., Bender, L., Burns, S.Z., Skoll, J., & et al. (2006). An inconvenient truth. Paramount Pictures.
Govindan, K., Kaliyan, M., Kannan, D., & Haq, A.N. (2014). Barriers analysis for green supply chain management implementation in Indian industries using analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Production Economics, 147(Part B), 555–568. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.08.018.
Heugues, M. (2012). International environmental cooperation: a new eye on the greenhouse gas emissions’ control. Annals of Operations Research, 220, 239–262. doi:10.1007/s10479-012-1156-8.
Jemai, J., Zekri, M., & Mellouli, K. (2012). An NSGA-II algorithm for the green vehicle routing problem. In J.-K. Hao, & M. Middendorf (Eds.), Evolutionary computation in combinatorial optimization (pp. 37–48). Berlin: Springer.
Johnson, K.C. (2010). Circumventing the weight-versus-footprint tradeoffs in vehicle fuel economy regulation. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 15(8), 503– 506.
Laguna, M. (2009). Scatter search and path relinking. Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization: Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5467, 1.
Lin, C., Choy, K.L., Ho, G.T.S., Chung, S.H., & Lam, H.Y. (2014). Survey of green vehicle routing problem: past and future trends. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(4, Part 1), 1118–1138. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2013.07.107.
Lin, C., Choy, K.L., Ho, G.T.S., & Ng, T.W. (2014). A genetic algorithm-based optimization model for supporting green transportation operations. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(7), 3284–3296. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2013.11.032.
Marti, R., Laguna, M., & Glover, F. (2003). Principles of scatter search: basic design and advanced strategies. European Journal of Operational Research, 169(2), 359–372.
Nagurney, A., & Nagurney, L.S. (2010). Sustainable supply chain network design: a multicriteria perspective. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 3(3), 189–197. doi:10.1080/19397038.2010.491562.
Nash, J. (1951). Non-cooperative games. The Annals of Mathematics, 54(2), 286–295.
Pan, S., Ballot, E., & Fontane, F. (2013). The reduction of greenhouse gas emissions from freight transport by pooling supply chains. International Journal of Production Economics, 143(1), 86–94. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.10.023.
Pradenas, L., Oportus, B., & Parada, V. (2013). Mitigation of Greenhouse gas emissions in vehicle routing problems with backhauling. Expert Systems With Applications, 40(8), 2985–2991.
Rief, D., & van Dinther, C. (2010). Negotiation for cooperation in logistics networks: an experimental study. Group Decision and Negotiation, 19(3), 211–226. doi:10.1007/s10726-010-9193-7.
Roth, A., & Kaberger, T. (2002). Making transport systems sustainable. Journal of Cleaner Production, 10(4), 361–371.
Russell, R.A., & Chiang, W.C. (2006). Scatter search for the vehicle routing problem with time windows. European Journal of Operational Research, 169(2), 602–622.
Shapley, L., & Scarf, H. (1974). On cores and indivisibility. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 1(1), 23–37.
Solomon, M.M. (1987). Algorithms for the vehicle routing and scheduling problems with time window constraints. Operations Research, 35(2), 254–265.
Solomon, M.M. (2005). Solomon VRPTW Benchmark Problems [En ligne]. - 24 March 2005. - 20 August 2011. - http://w.cba.neu.edu/~msolomon/problems.htm.
Sundarakani, B., de Souza, R., Goh, M., Wagner, S.M., & Manikandan, S. (2010). Modeling carbon footprints across the supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 128(1), 43–50.
Talbi, E.-G. (2009). Metaheuristics: from design to implementation. New York: Wiley.
Toth, P., & Vigo, D. (2014). Vehicle routing: problems, methods, and applications, 2nd edn. Philadelphia: SIAM - Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
Wang, X., & Kopfer, H. (2014). Collaborative transportation planning of less-than-truckload freight. OR Spectrum, 36(2), 357–380. doi:10.1007/s00291-013-0331-x.
Zecca, A., & Chiari, L. (2010). Fossil-fuel constraints on global warming. Energy Policy, 38(1), 1–3.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sanchez, M., Pradenas, L., Deschamps, JC. et al. Reducing the carbon footprint in a vehicle routing problem by pooling resources from different companies. Netnomics 17, 29–45 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11066-015-9099-2
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11066-015-9099-2