Abstract
Scholars increasingly devote attention to the role of animals and the relationships between humans and animals in the Middle Ages and the Early Modern period. Much of this work focuses on the roles animals play in texts, on the function of “animals as human exemplars,” and on the lessons human beings during these periods could learn in light of their evolving understanding of animals. German Volksbücher—oftentimes didactic texts that were aimed at teaching morality and religious mores—were prime vehicles for such exemplary animal figures. Thüring von Ringoltingen’s Melusine has been a frequent focus of such study in light of the titular character’s animality. But magic, too, was of special interest to readers of Volksbücher, and frequently accompanied descriptions of animals in texts, informed their characters, or even motivated their connections to human beings. Through close textual analysis of Thüring’s retelling of the tale, I demonstrate that the intersection of animals and magic, illuminated specifically by James George Frazer’s concept of “sympathetic magic,” explicitly serves the text’s aim of educating Early Modern readers about moral behavior. Thüring’s Melusine thus functions as a cautionary tale that warns against the dangers of human immorality through its exploration of magically transferred animality.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Badke, D. (2011). The Medieval Bestiary. Resource document. http://bestiary.ca/beasts/beastalphashort.htm. Accessed May 25, 2014.
Classen, A. (2004). Love and fear of the foreign: Thüring von Ringoltingen’s Melusine. A Xenological Analysis. Daphnis, 33, 97–122.
Classen, A. (2013). The monster outside and within: Medieval literary reflections on ethical epistemology. From Beowulf to Marie de France, the Nibelungenlied, and Thüring von Ringoltingen’s Melusine. Neohelicon, 40, 521–542.
Drittenbass, C., & Schnyder, A. (Eds.). (2010). Eulenspiegel trifft Melusine: Der frühneuhochdeutsche Prosaroman im Licht neuer Forschungen und Methoden. Akten der Lausanner Tagung vom 2. bis 4. Oktober 2008. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Edwards, K. (2005). Milton’s reformed animals. An Early Modern Bestiary. Milton Quarterly, 39(3), 121–131.
Frazer, J. G. (1999). The principles of sympathetic magic. In A. Dundes (Ed.), International folkloristics: Classic contributions by the founders of folklore. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Füssel, S., & Kreutzer, H. J. (Eds.). (1988). Historia von D. Johann Fausten. Stuttgart: Reclam.
Keller, H. E. (2008). Berner Samstagsgeheimnisse: Die Vertikale als Erzählformel in der Melusine. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur, 127(2), 208–239.
Krappe, A. H. (1944). Animal children. California Folklore Quarterly, 3(1), 45–52.
Pfeiffer, F. (Ed.). (1962). Das Buch der Natur von Konrad von Megenburg. Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlagsbuchhandlung.
Roloff, H. G. (Ed.). (1981). Fortunatus. Stuttgart: Reclam.
Salisbury, J. E. (1994). The beast within: Animals in the Middle Ages. New York: Routledge.
Thüring von Ringoltingen. (1969). In H. G. Roloff (Ed.), Melusine. In der Fassung des Buchs der Liebe (1587). Stuttgart: Reclam.
Yamamoto, D. (2000). The boundaries of the human in medieval English literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Yelle, R. A. (2001). Rhetorics of law and ritual: A semiotic comparison of the law of talion and sympathetic magic. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 69(3), 627–647.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Varela, S.H. Origins of Misfortune: Sympathetic Magic and the Transference of Animality in Thüring von Ringoltingen’s Melusine (1456). Neophilologus 99, 271–285 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11061-015-9433-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11061-015-9433-9