Skip to main content
Log in

High levels of polo-like kinase 1 and phosphorylated translationally controlled tumor protein indicate poor prognosis in neuroblastomas

  • Laboratory Investigation
  • Published:
Journal of Neuro-Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite multimodality treatment, the long-term survival of high-risk patients with neuroblastomas is below 50 %. New anti-mitotic drugs against targets, such as polo-like kinase 1 (PLK1), are being evaluated in early phase clinical trials. PLK1 phosphorylates the translationally controlled tumor protein (TCTP). We investigated the expression of PLK1 and the phosphorylated substrate, pTCTP, by immunostaining eighty-eight neuroblastomas. Digitally scanned slides were scored using image analysis software. The median PLK1 and pTCTP proliferation indices (PIs) were 4.6 and 1 % respectively. There was moderate positive correlation between PLK1 and pTCTP (ρ = 0.65). The PIs for both markers were significantly higher in neuroblastomas from patients with adverse clinical (advanced-stage, high-risk group, primary abdominal compared to extra-abdominal sites), biological (MYCN amplification, 1p deletion, 17q gain) and pathological (undifferentiated or poorly differentiated status, high mitosis-karyorrhexis index, [MKI], unfavorable histology) factors. Using Cox regression models, higher-than-median PLK1 and pTCTP PIs were associated with a shorter overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) in the univariate analyses. In the multivariate analyses, a high PLK1 PI count was associated with significantly shorter OS and EFS, independent of MYCN amplification and MKI; in addition, the significantly shorter EFS was independent of the risk-group. After adjustment for MKI and MYCN amplification, and for risk-group, high pTCTP PI was also associated with significantly shorter OS. Our study shows that PLK1 provides valuable prognostic information in patients with neuroblastomas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cohn SL, Pearson AD, London WB, Monclair T, Ambros PF, Brodeur GM, Faldum A, Hero B, Iehara T, Machin D, Mosseri V, Simon T, Garaventa A, Castel V, Matthay KK, Force IT (2009) The International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) classification system: an INRG task force report. J Clin Oncol 27:289–297

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Brodeur GM, Seeger RC, Barrett A, Castleberry RP, D’Angio G, De Bernardi B, Evans AE, Favrot M, Freeman AI, Haase G et al (1988) International criteria for diagnosis, staging and response to treatment in patients with neuroblastoma. Prog Clin Biol Res 271:509–524

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brodeur GM, Pritchard J, Berthold F, Carlsen NL, Castel V, Castelberry RP, De Bernardi B, Evans AE, Favrot M, Hedborg F et al (1993) Revisions of the international criteria for neuroblastoma diagnosis, staging, and response to treatment. J Clin Oncol 11:1466–1477

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cotterill SJ, Pearson AD, Pritchard J, Foot AB, Roald B, Kohler JA, Imeson J (2000) Clinical prognostic factors in 1277 patients with neuroblastoma: results of The European Neuroblastoma Study Group ‘Survey’ 1982–1992. Eur J Cancer 36:901–908

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Shimada H, Ambros IM, Dehner LP, Hata J, Joshi VV, Roald B, Stram DO, Gerbing RB, Lukens JN, Matthay KK, Castleberry RP (1999) The international neuroblastoma pathology classification (the shimada system). Cancer 86:364–372

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Peuchmaur M, d’Amore ES, Joshi VV, Hata J, Roald B, Dehner LP, Gerbing RB, Stram DO, Lukens JN, Matthay KK, Shimada H (2003) Revision of the international neuroblastoma pathology classification: confirmation of favorable and unfavorable prognostic subsets in ganglioneuroblastoma, nodular. Cancer 98:2274–2281

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Park JR, Bagatell R, London WB, Maris JM, Cohn SL, Mattay KM, Hogarty M, Committee COGN (2013) Children’s Oncology Group’s 2013 blueprint for research: neuroblastoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer 60:985–993

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cheung NK, Dyer MA (2013) Neuroblastoma: developmental biology, cancer genomics and immunotherapy. Nat Rev Cancer 13:397–411

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lens SM, Voest EE, Medema RH (2010) Shared and separate functions of polo-like kinases and aurora kinases in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 10:825–841

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Strebhardt K (2006) Targeting polo-like kinase 1 for cancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer 6:321–330

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Faisal A, Vaughan L, Bavetsias V, Sun C, Atrash B, Avery S, Jamin Y, Robinson SP, Workman P, Blagg J, Raynaud FI, Eccles SA, Chesler L, Linardopoulos S (2011) The aurora kinase inhibitor CCT137690 downregulates MYCN and sensitizes MYCN-amplified neuroblastoma in vivo. Mol Cancer Ther 10:2115–2123

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Shang X, Burlingame SM, Okcu MF, Ge N, Russell HV, Egler RA, David RD, Vasudevan SA, Yang J, Nuchtern JG (2009) Aurora A is a negative prognostic factor and a new therapeutic target in human neuroblastoma. Mol Cancer Ther 8:2461–2469

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ackermann S, Goeser F, Schulte JH, Schramm A, Ehemann V, Hero B, Eggert A, Berthold F, Fischer M (2011) Polo-like kinase 1 is a therapeutic target in high-risk neuroblastoma. Clin Cancer Res 17:731–741

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gorlick R, Kolb EA, Keir ST, Maris JM, Reynolds CP, Kang MH, Carol H, Lock R, Billups CA, Kurmasheva RT, Houghton PJ, Smith MA (2014) Initial testing (stage 1) of the Polo-like kinase inhibitor volasertib (BI 6727), by the Pediatric Preclinical Testing Program. Pediatr Blood Cancer 61:158–164

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Acunzo J, Baylot V, So A, Rocchi P (2014) TCTP as therapeutic target in cancers. Cancer Treat Rev 40:760–769

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cucchi U, Gianellini LM, De Ponti A, Sola F, Alzani R, Patton V, Pezzoni A, Troiani S, Saccardo MB, Rizzi S, Giorgini ML, Cappella P, Beria I, Valsasina B (2010) Phosphorylation of TCTP as a marker for polo-like kinase-1 activity in vivo. Anticancer Res 30:4973–4985

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ramani P, Nash R, Rogers CA (2014) Aurora kinase A is superior to Ki67 as a prognostic indicator of survival in neuroblastoma. Histopathology. doi:10.1111/his.12520

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Shimada H, Ambros IM, Dehner LP, Hata J, Joshi VV, Roald B (1999) Terminology and morphologic criteria of neuroblastic tumors: recommendations by the International Neuroblastoma Pathology Committee. Cancer 86:349–363

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Loddo M, Kingsbury SR, Rashid M, Proctor I, Holt C, Young J, El-Sheikh S, Falzon M, Eward KL, Prevost T, Sainsbury R, Stoeber K, Williams GH (2009) Cell-cycle-phase progression analysis identifies unique phenotypes of major prognostic and predictive significance in breast cancer. Br J Cancer 100:959–970

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ma YP, Zhu WL (2012) Cytoplasmic and nuclear localization of TCTP in normal and cancer cells. Biochem Res Int 2012:871728

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nowak M, Svensson MA, Carlsson J, Vogel W, Kebschull M, Wernert N, Kristiansen G, Andren O, Braun M, Perner S (2014) Prognostic significance of phospho-histone H3 in prostate carcinoma. World J Urol 32:703–707

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gudlaugsson E, Skaland I, Janssen EA, Smaaland R, Shao Z, Malpica A, Voorhorst F, Baak JP (2012) Comparison of the effect of different techniques for measurement of Ki67 proliferation on reproducibility and prognosis prediction accuracy in breast cancer. Histopathology 61:1134–1144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Pitts TM, Davis SL, Eckhardt SG, Bradshaw-Pierce EL (2014) Targeting nuclear kinases in cancer: development of cell cycle kinase inhibitors. Pharmacol Ther 142:258–269

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Spaniol K, Boos J, Lanvers-Kaminsky C (2011) An in vitro evaluation of the polo-like kinase inhibitor GW843682X against paediatric malignancies. Anticancer Drugs 22:531–542

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hansford LM, McKee AE, Zhang L, George RE, Gerstle JT, Thorner PS, Smith KM, Look AT, Yeger H, Miller FD, Irwin MS, Thiele CJ, Kaplan DR (2007) Neuroblastoma cells isolated from bone marrow metastases contain a naturally enriched tumor-initiating cell. Cancer Res 67:11234–11243

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Grinshtein N, Datti A, Fujitani M, Uehling D, Prakesch M, Isaac M, Irwin MS, Wrana JL, Al-Awar R, Kaplan DR (2011) Small molecule kinase inhibitor screen identifies polo-like kinase 1 as a target for neuroblastoma tumor-initiating cells. Cancer Res 71:1385–1395

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Yarm FR (2002) Plk1 phosphorylation regulates the microtubule-stabilizing protein TCTP. Mol Cell Biol 22:6209–6221

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Mike Luckett for technical advice. The authors also acknowledge the clinicians, radiologists and all the individuals who were involved in the management of the patients.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pramila Ramani.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

We declare that we have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ramani, P., Nash, R., Sowa-Avugrah, E. et al. High levels of polo-like kinase 1 and phosphorylated translationally controlled tumor protein indicate poor prognosis in neuroblastomas. J Neurooncol 125, 103–111 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-015-1900-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-015-1900-4

Keywords

Navigation