Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Needle-leaved trees impacts on rainfall interception and canopy storage capacity in an arid environment

  • Published:
New Forests Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In semiarid and arid areas, it is important to understand the amount of rainfall reaching the ground in order to develop effective water plan strategies for the selection of the tree species for afforestation goals. We measured the rainfall interception and canopy storage capacity of individual trees of Pinus eldarica and Cupressus arizonica growing in an afforested Park located in an arid region of Iran. Correlations between percent relative interception and gross rainfall, mean daily wind speed, mean daily air temperature, and mean daily relative humidity were examined both for the wet and dry seasons. Canopy storage capacity was estimated by indirect methods: the Pereira, mean, minimum, and Gash and Morton. The cumulative mean values of percent relative interception and gross rainfall for P. eldarica and C. arizonica trees averaged 66 and 53 %, respectively. Combining meteorological parameters with rainfall depth only slightly improved the correlation with the percent of gross rainfall lost to interception loss in the dry season for P. eldarica (from 0.87 to 0.90) and C. arizonica (from 0.90 to 0.92). For P. eldarica, the mean estimate of canopy storage capacity was 1.31 versus 1.00 mm in C. arizonica trees. Because the storms in this region are small, the large canopy water storage of P. eldarica will result in greater interception losses relative to C. arizonica. Therefore, afforestation efforts would be better served planting C. arizonica over P. eldarica, if maximizing water inputs is a main management goal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Asadian Y (2007) Rainfall interception in an urban environment. Dissertation, University of British Columbia

  • Aston AR (1979) Rainfall interception by eight small trees. J Hydrol 42:383–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aussenac G (1968) Interception des précipitations par le couvert forestier. Ann Sel For 25:135–156

  • Baltas E (2007) Spatial distribution of climate indices in northern Greece. Meteorol Appl 14:69–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer CA, Smith WK (1997) Patterns of leaf surface wetness for montane and subalpine plants. Plant, Cell Environ 20:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks KN, Folliott PF, Gregersen HM, DeBano LF (2003) Hydrology and the management of watersheds. Iowa State Press, Iowa

    Google Scholar 

  • Calder IR (1977) A model of transpiration and interception loss from a spruce forest in Plynlimon, Central Wales. J Hydrol 33:247–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calder IR (1996) Dependence of rainfall interception on drop size: 1. Development of the two-layer stochastic model. J Hydrol 185:363–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calder IR, Wright IR (1986) Gamma ray attenuation studies of interception from Sitka spruce: some evidence for an additional transport mechanism. Water Resour Res 22:409–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlyle-Moses DE, Gash JHC (2011) Rainfall interception loss by forest canopies. In: Levia DF, Carlyle-Moses D, Tanaka T (eds) Forest hydrology and biogeochemistry: synthesis of past research and future directions, vol 216., Ecological studiesSpringer, New York, pp 407–424

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • David TS, Gash JHC, Valente F, Pereira JS, Fereira MI, David JS (2006) Rainfall interception by an isolated evergreen oak tree in a Mediterranean savannah. Hydrol Process 20:2713–2726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deguchi A, Hattori S, Park H (2006) The influence of seasonal changes in canopy structure on interception loss: application of the revised Gash model. J Hydrol 319:80–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunkerley DL (2008) Intra-storm evaporation as a component of canopy interception loss in dryland shrubs: observations from Fowlers Gap, Australia. Hydrol Process 22:1985–1995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleischbein K, Wilcke W, Boy J, Valarezo C, Zech W, Knoblich K (2005) Rainfall interception in a lower montane forest in Ecuador: effects of canopy properties. Hydrol Process 19:1355–1371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gash JHC (1979) An analytical model of rainfall interception by forest. Q J R Meteor Soc 105:43–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gash JHC, Morton AJ (1978) An application of the Rutter model to the estimation of the interception loss from Thetford forest. J Hydrol 38:49–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gash JHC, Lloyd CR, Lachaud G (1995) Estimating sparse forest rainfall interception with an analytical model. J Hydrol 170:79–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geiger R (1965) The climate near the ground. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall RL (2003) Interception loss as a function of rainfall and forest type: stochastic modeling for tropical canopies revisited. J Hydrol 280:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hancock NH, Crowther JM (1979) A technique for the direct measurement of water storage on a forest canopy. J Hydrol 41:105–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herwitz SR (1985) Interception storage capacities of tropical rain forest trees. J Hydrol 77:237–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horton RE (1919) Rainfall interception. Mon Weather Rev 47:608–623

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2013) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. IPCC, Geneva. http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/wg1/WG1AR5_ALL_FINAL.pdf

  • Jackson IJ (1975) Relationships between rainfall parameters and interception by tropical rainforest. J Hydrol 24:215–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keim RF (2003) Attenuation of rainfall intensity by forest canopies. Dissertation, Oregon State University

  • Klaassen W, Bosveld F, De Water E (1998) Water storage and evaporation as constituents of rainfall interception. J Hydrol 212–213:36–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kume T, Manfori OJ, Kuraj IK, Tanaka N, Horiuchi T, Suzuki M, Kumagai T (2008) Estimation of water canopy storage capacity from sap flow measurements in a Bornean tropical rainforest. J Hydrol 352:288–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lankreijer HJM, Hendriks MJ, Klaassen W (1993) A comparison of models simulating rainfall interception of forests. Agric For Meteorol 64:187–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leyton L, Reynolds ERC, Thompson FB (1967) Rainfall interception in forest and moorland. In: Sopper WE, Lull HW (eds) Proceedings of the international symposium on forest hydrology. Pergamon Press, New York, pp 163–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Link TE, Unsworth M, Marks D (2004) The dynamics of rainfall interception by a seasonal temperate rainforest. Agric For Meteorol 124:171–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu SG (1998) Estimation of rainfall of rainfall storage capacity in the canopies of cypress wetlands and slash Pine upland in North-Central Florida. J Hydrol 207:32–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Llorens P, Gallart F (2000) A simplified method for forest water storage capacity measurement. J Hydrol 240:131–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Llorens P, Poch R, Latron J, Gallart F (1997) Rainfall interception by a Pinus sylvestris forest patch overgrown in a Mediterranean mountainous abandoned area Ι. Monitoring design and results down to the event scale. J Hydrol 199:331–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loescher HW, Powers JS, Oberbauer SF (2002) Spatial variation of throughfall volume in an old-growth tropical wet forest, Costa Rica. J Trop Ecol 18:397–407

    Google Scholar 

  • Maestre FT, Cortina J (2004) Are Pinus halepensis plantations useful as a restoration tool in semiarid Mediterranean areas? For Ecol Manage 198:303–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Motahari M, Attarod P, Pypker TG, Etemad V, Shirvany A (2013) Rainfall interception and canopy storage capacity of a Pinus eldarica plantation in a semi-arid climate zone: an application of the Gash model. J Agric Sci Technol 15:981–994

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman BD, Wilcox BP, Archer SR, Breshears DD, Dahm CN, Duffy CJ, McDowell NG, Phillips FM, Scanlon BR, Vivoni ER (2006) Ecohydrology of water-limited environments: a scientific vision. Water Resour Res 42:6. doi:10.1029/2005WR004141

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereira FL, Gash JHC, David JS, David TS, Monteiro PR, Valente F (2009) Modelling interception loss from evergreen oak Mediterranean Savannas: application of a tree-based modelling approach. Agric For Meteorol 149:680–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porporato A, Rodriguez-Iturbe I (2002) Ecohydrology—a challenging multidisciplinary research perspective. Hydrol Sci J 47:811–821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pypker TG, Bond BJ, Link TE, Marks D, Unsworth MH (2005) The importance of canopy structure in controlling the interception loss of rainfall: examples from a young and an old-growth Douglas-fir forest. Agric For Meteorol 130:113–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds JF (2001) Desertification. In: Levin SA (ed) Encyclopedia of biodiversity, vol 2. Academic Press, London, pp 61–78

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez-Iturbe I, Porporato A (2004) Ecohydrology of water-controlled ecosystems: soil moisture and plant dynamics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutter AJ, Kershaw KA, Robins PC, Monton AG (1971) A predictive model of rainfall interception forests, 1. Derivation of the model from observations in a plantation of corsican pine. Agric Meteorol 9:367–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutter AJ, Morton AJ, Robins PC (1975) A predictive model of rainfall interception in forests. II. Generalization of the model and comparison with observations in some coniferous and hardwood stands. J Appl Ecol 12:367–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadeghi SMM, Attarod P, Pypker TG, Dunkerley D (2014) Is canopy interception increased in semiarid tree plantations? Evidence from a field investigation in Tehran, Iran. Turk J Agric For 38:792–806. doi:10.3906/tar-1312-53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadeghi SMM, Attarod P, Van Stan JT, Pypker TG, Dunkerley D (2015) Efficiency of the reformulated Gash’s interception model in semiarid afforestations. Agric For Meteorol 201:76–85. doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2014.10.006

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiller G (2001) Biometeorology and recreation in east Mediterranean forests. Landsc Urban Plan 57:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi Z, Wang Y, Xu L, Xiong W, Yu P, Gao J, Zhang L (2010) Fraction of incident rainfall within the canopy of a pure stand of Pinus armandii with revised Gash model in the Liupan Mountains of China. J Hydrol 385:44–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smettem KRJ (2008) Welcome address for the new ‘Ecohydrology’ Journal. Ecohydrology 1:1–2. doi:10.1002/eco.2

    Google Scholar 

  • Staelens J, Schrijver AD, Verheyen K, Verhoest N (2008) Rainfall partitioning into throughfall, stemflow, and interception within a single beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) canopy: influence of foliation, rain event characteristics, and meteorology. Hydrol Process 22:33–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toba T, Ohta T (2005) An observational study of the factors that influence interception loss in boreal and temperate forests. J Hydrol 313:208–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valente F, David JS, Gash JHC (1997) Modelling interception loss for two sparse eucalypt and pine forests in central Portugal using reformulated Rutter and Gash analytical models. J Hydrol 190:141–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk AIJM (2004) Ecohydrology: It’s all in the game? Hydrol Process 18:3683–3686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vegas Galdos F, Álvarez C, García A, Revilla JA (2012) Estimated distributed rainfall interception using a simple conceptual model and Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS). J Hydrol 468–469:213–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao Q, McPherson E, Ustin L, Grismer MJ, Simpson RJ (2000) Winter rainfall interception by two mature open-grown trees in Davis, California. Hydrol Process 14:763–784

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Forestry and Forest Economics, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, P.O. Box 31585-4314, Karaj, Iran

    Pedram Attarod, Seyed Mohammad Moein Sadeghi & Hossein Bagheri

  2. Department of Natural Resource Sciences, Faculty of Science, Thompson Rivers University, Kamloops, Canada

    Thomas Grant Pypker

  3. Department of Environment, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran

    Mohsen Bagheri

  4. Department of Wood Sciences, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran

    Vilma Bayramzadeh

Authors
  1. Pedram Attarod
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Seyed Mohammad Moein Sadeghi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Thomas Grant Pypker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hossein Bagheri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Mohsen Bagheri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Vilma Bayramzadeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pedram Attarod.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Attarod, P., Sadeghi, S.M.M., Pypker, T.G. et al. Needle-leaved trees impacts on rainfall interception and canopy storage capacity in an arid environment. New Forests 46, 339–355 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-014-9464-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-014-9464-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation