A “delay discounting” method – selection of food reinforcement on the basis of its value and the delay in receiving it – was used to identify animals with high and low impulsivity. Rats preferring an immediate but low-value reinforcement were assigned to the high impulsivity group and those able to restrain their behavior and receive the valuable reinforcement constituted the low-impulsivity group; some animals showed mixed-type reactions. In a Morris water maze, the three groups of animals found the platform hidden beneath the water at different times, swimming different distances and at different speeds. These differences, however, were only apparent on overall (for all trials and days) comparisons of measures and were not significant when compared on individual training days and numbers of trials. These results provide evidence that the differences between groups may be due to differences in the overall motor activity of the animals without any significant difference in the manifestations of long-term or working memory.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alderson, R. M, Kasper, L. J., Patros, C. H., et al., “Working memory deficits in boys with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): An examination of orthographic coding and episodic buffer processes,” Child. Neuropsychol., 15, 1–22 (2014).
Bickel, W. K., Yi, R., Landes, R. D., et al., “Remember the future: working memory training decreases delay discounting among stimulant addicts,” Biol. Psychiatry, 69, No. 3, 260–265 (2011).
Broos, N., Schmaal, L., Wiskerke, J., et al., “The relationship between impulsive choice and impulsive action: a cross-species translational study,” PLoS One, 7, No. 5, e36781 (2012).
Cardinal, R. N., Dawe, N., Robbins, T. W., and Everitt, B. J., “Local analysis of behaviour in the adjusting-delay task for assessing choice of delayed reinforcement,” Neural Netw., 15, No. 4–6, 617–634 (2002).
Cole, B. J. and Robbins, T. W., “Effects of 6-hydroxydopamine lesions of the nucleus accumbens septi on performance of a 5-choice serial reaction time task in rats: implications for theories of selective attention and arousal,” Behav. Brain Res., 33, No. 2, 165–179 (1989).
Danner, U. N., Evers, C., Sternheim, L., et al., “Influence of negative affect on choice behavior in individuals with binge eating pathology,” Psychiatry Res., 207, No. 1–2, 100–106 (2013).
Dellu-Hagedorn, F., “Relationship between impulsivity, hyperactivity and working memory: a differential analysis in the rat,” Behav. Brain Funct., 2, 1–18 (2006).
Dunnett, S. B., “The role and repair of forebrain cholinergic systems in short-term memory. Studies using the delayed matching-to-position task in rats,” Adv. Neurol., 59, 53–65 (1993).
Evenden, J. L. and Ryan, C. N., “The pharmacology of impulsive behaviour in rats: the effects of drugs on response choice with varying delays of reinforcement,” Psychopharmacology (Berl.), 128, No. 2, 161–170 (1996).
Grant, J. E. and Chamberlain, S. R., “Impulsive action and impulsive choice across substance and behavioral addictions: cause or consequence?” Addict. Behav., 39, No. 11, 1632–1639 (2014).
Grigoryan, G. A., Mitchell, S. N., Hodges, H., et al., “Are the cognitive-enhancing effects of nicotine in the rat with lesions to the forebrain cholinergic projection system mediated by an interaction with the noradrenergic system?” Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav., 49, No. 3, 511–521 (1994a).
Grigoryan, G. A., Peters S., Gray, J. A., and Hodges, H., “Interactions between the effects of propranolol and nicotine on radial maze performance of rats with lesions of the forebrain cholinergic projection system,” Behav. Pharmacol., 5, No. 3, 265–280. (1994b).
Grigoryan, G., Hodges, H., Mitchell, S., et al., “6-OHDA lesions of the nucleus accumbens accentuate memory deficits in animals with lesions to the forebrain cholinergic projection system: effects of nicotine administration on learning and memory in the water maze,” Neurobiol. Learn. Mem., 65, No. 2, 135–153 (1996).
Hinson, J. M., Jameson, T. L., and Whitney, P., “Impulsive decision making and working memory,” J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn., 29, No. 2, 298–306 (2003).
Lempert, K. M. and Pizzagalli, D. A., “Delay discounting and future-directed thinking in anhedonic individuals,” J. Behav. Ther. Exp. Psychiatry, 41, No. 3, 258–264 (2010).
Markowska, A., Buresová O., and Bures, J., “An attempt to account for controversial estimates of working memory persistence in the radial maze,” Behav. Neural. Biol., 38, No. 1, 97–112 (1983).
Mazur, J. E., “Choice between single and multiple delayed reinforces,” J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 46, No. 1, 67–77 (1986).
Merzhanova, G. Kh., Kuleshova, E. P., Sidorina, et al., “Coherent neuron activity in frontal cortex, n. accumbens and dorsomedial striatum during impulsive and self-control behavior in cats,” World J. Neurosci., 4, 341–352 (2014).
Merzhanova, G. Kh., Kuleshova, E. P., and Grigor’yan, G. A., “Assessment of impulsive behavior based on a time-counting model,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 56, No. 6, 801–8014 (2006).
Morris, R., “Developments of a water-maze procedure for studying spatial learning in the rat,” J. Neurosci. Meth., 11, No. 1, 47–60 (1984).
Patros, C. H., Alderson, R. M., Lea, S. E., et al., “Visuospatial working memory underlies choice-impulsivity in boys with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder,” Res. Dev. Disabil., 38, 134–144 (2015).
Renda, C. R., Stein J. S., and Madden, G. J., “Working-memory training: effects on delay discounting in male Long Evans rats,” J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 103, No. 1, 50–61 (2015).
Shamosh, N. A., Deyoung, C. G., Green, A. E., et al., “Individual differences in delay discounting: relation to intelligence, working memory, and anterior prefrontal cortex,” Psychol. Sci., 19, No. 9, 904–911 (2008).
Stevens, L., Verdejo-Garcia, A., Goudriaan, A. E., et al., “Impulsivity as a vulnerability factor for poor addiction treatment outcomes: a review of neurocognitive findings among individuals with substance use disorders,” J. Subst. Abuse. Treat., 47, No. 1, 58–72 (2014).
Swann, A. C., Liiffijt, M., Lane, S. D., et al., “Interacting mechanisms of impulsivity. III. Bipolar disorder and antisocial personality disorder,” J. Psychiatr. Res., 45, No. 11, 1477–1482, (2011).
Wesley, M. J. and Bickel, W. K., “Remember the future. II: metaanalyses and functional overlap of working memory and delay discounting,” Biol. Psychiatry, 75, No. 6, 435–448 (2014).
Winstanley, C. A., “The utility of rat models of impulsivity in developing pharmacotherapies for impulse control disorders,” Br. J. Pharmacol., 164, No. 4, 1301–1321 (2011).
Zaichenko, M. I. and Merzhanova, G. Kh., “Studies of the manifestations of impulsivity in rats in a situation of choosing food reinforcements of different value,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 60, No. 1, 56–64 (2010).
Zaichenko, M. I., Vanetsian, G. L., and Merzhanova, G. Kh., “Differences in the behavior of impulsive and self-controlled rats in studies in the open fi eld test and the light-dark chamber,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 61, No. 3, 340–350 (2011).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Translated from Zhurnal Vysshei Nervnoi Deyatel’nosti imeni I. P. Pavlova, Vol. 66, No. 1, pp. 82–91, January–February, 2016.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zaichenko, M.I., Bazhenova, D.A., Grigor’yan, G.A. et al. Does Impulsivity Influence the Operation of Long-Term and Working Memory in Rats?. Neurosci Behav Physi 47, 427–434 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-017-0416-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-017-0416-0