Skip to main content
Log in

Wellsite, Laboratory, and Mathematical Techniques for Determining Sorbed Gas Content of Coals and Gas Shales Utilizing Well Cuttings

  • Published:
Natural Resources Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Drill cuttings can be used for desorption analyses but with more uncertainty than desorption analyses done with cores. Drill cuttings are not recommended to take the place of core, but in some circumstances, desorption work with cuttings can provide a timely and economic supplement to that of cores. The mixed lithologic nature of drill cuttings is primarily the source of uncertainty in their analysis for gas content, for it is unclear how to apportion the gas generated from both the coal and the dark-colored shale that is mixed in usually with the coal. In the Western Interior Basin Coal Basin in eastern Kansas (Pennsylvanian-age coals), dark-colored shales with normal (∼100 API units) gamma-ray levels seem to give off minimal amounts of gas on the order of less than five standard cubic feet per ton (scf/ton). In some cuttings analyses this rule of thumb for gas content of the shale is adequate for inferring the gas content of coals, but shales with high-gamma-ray values (>150 API units) may yield several times this amount of gas. The uncertainty in desorption analysis of drill cuttings can be depicted graphically on a diagram identified as a “lithologic component sensitivity analysis diagram.” Comparison of cuttings desorption results from nearby wells on this diagram, can sometimes yield an unique solution for the gas content of both a dark shale and coal mixed in a cuttings sample. A mathematical solution, based on equating the dry, ash-free gas-contents of the admixed coal and dark-colored shale, also yields results that are correlative to data from nearby cores.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ASTM, 2005, Petroleum products, lubricants, and fossil fuels, in Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Sec. 5, v. 05.01–05.04: American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA

  • Brady, L. L., 1997, Kansas coal resources and their potential for Kansas coalbed methane: Trans. 1997 Am. Assoc. Petroleum Geologists Mid-Continent Sec. Meeting, Oklahoma City, OK, p. 150–163

  • Dake L. P. 1978 Fundamentals of reservoir engineering. Elsevier Scientific Publ., New York, NY, 443 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Doveton J. H., Merriam D. F. 2004 Borehole petrophysical chemostratigraphy of Pennsylvanian black shales in the Kansas subsurface: Chem. Geol. 206(3–4), 249–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckel P. H. 1977 Origin of phosphatic black shale facies in Pennsylvanian cyclothems of Midcontinent North America: Am. Assoc. Petroleum Geologists Bull. 61(7), 1045–1068

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, T. A., 2004, Core description of the Marmaton and Cherokee Groups – Osborn LLC – Layne Energy Rose Hill #1–6 Well (sec. 6-T.16S.–R.24E.), Miami County, KS: Kansas Geol. Survey Open-File Rept. 2004–24, 4 p., with appendices. Online at: http://www.kgs.ku.edu/PRS/publication/2004/ofr-2004/index.html

  • Kissel, F. N., McCulloch, C. M., and Elder, C. H., 1973, The direct method of determining methane content of coals for ventilation design: U.S. Dept. Interior, Bureau of Mines, Washington, D.C., Report of Investigations 7767, 17 p

  • Mavor, M., and Nelson, C. R., 1997, Coalbed reservoir gas-in-place analysis: Gas Research Inst., Chicago, IL, Reference No. GRI-97/0263, 134 p

  • McLennan, J. D., Schafer, P. S., and Pratt, T. J., 1995, A guide to determining coalbed gas content: Gas Research Inst., Chicago, IL, Reference No. GRI-94/0396, 180 p

  • Stoeckinger, W. T., 1991, Methods to measure directly the gas content of coals: Trans. 1991 Am. Assoc. Petroleum Geologists Mid-Continent Sec. Meeting, Wichita, KS, p. 109–118

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author thanks Evergreen Resources, Tom O’Neill of Dart Cherokee Basin Operating Company, LLC, and Jim Stegeman of Colt Energy for wellsite access to their cores and cuttings. Willard Guy (Kansas Geological Survey) and Bill Stoeckinger (consultant, Bartlesville, OK) are thanked for critical reading of early drafts of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. David Newell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Newell, K.D. Wellsite, Laboratory, and Mathematical Techniques for Determining Sorbed Gas Content of Coals and Gas Shales Utilizing Well Cuttings. Nat Resour Res 16, 55–66 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-007-9031-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-007-9031-z

Keywords

Navigation