Abstract
Nanotechnology is predicted to improve many aspects of human life. By 2015, it is estimated to represent $3.1 trillion in manufactured goods. Data is emerging that exposure to nanomaterials may pose a health risk to workers. If the economic promise of nanotechnology is to be achieved, ways need to be found to protect nanotechnology workers now. The Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (OSHAct) gave the responsibility to protect workers to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) through research, standards adoption, and standards enforcement. Since 1980, adopting new occupational health standards has grown more complex. The increased complexity has greatly slowed efforts to adopt protective standards for toxic agents that are well-known to pose significant risks. The likelihood of rapidly adopting standards to protect workers from nanomaterials, whose risks are just emerging, seems even more unlikely. Use of the OSHAct’s general duty clause to protect workers also seems uncertain at this time. In the interim, a national partnership led by NIOSH involving nanotech manufacturers and downstream users, workers, academic researchers, safety, and health practitioners is proposed. A National Nanotechnology Partnership would generate knowledge about the nature and the extent of worker risk, utilize that knowledge to develop risk control strategies to protect nanotechnology workers now, and provide an evidence base for NIOSH recommendations to OSHA for a nanotechnology program standard at a future date.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Administrative Procedures Act 5 United States Code § 553:2000
American Federation of Labor-Congress of Industrial Organizations v. OSHA, 965 F.2d 962 (11th Cir. 1992)
Cherrie J, Schneider T (1999) Validation of a new method for structured subjective assessment of past concentrations. Ann Occup Hyg 43(4):235–245
Code of Federal Regulations, 5 CFR Part 1320:1995
Code of Federal Regulations, 29 CFR § 1910.133:2005
Code of Federal Regulations, 29 CFR § 1910.134:2005
Code of Federal Regulations, 29 CFR § 1910.135:2005
Code of Federal Regulations, 29 CFR § 1910.136:2005
Code of Federal Regulations, 29 CFR § 1910.138:2005
Code of Federal Regulations, 29 CFR § 1910.1200:2005
Code of Federal Regulations, 29 CFR. § 1910.1450:2005
Code of Federal Regulations, 29 CFR Part 1904:2005
Congressional Review Act, 5 United States Code §§ 801–808:1996
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (1993) 509 U.S. 579
Davies CJ (2008) Nanotechnology oversight: an agenda for the new administration. Woodrow Wilson Center Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies. Available at http://www.nanotechproject.org/publications/archive/pen13/. Accessed 2 Feb 2009
Erdely AD, Hulderman T, Salmen R et al (2009) Cross-talk between lung and systemic circulation during carbon nanotube respiratory exposure–potential biomakers. Nano Lett 9(1):36–43. doi:10.1021/nl801828z
Erosion, Technology and Concentration Group (2007) Principles for the oversight of nanotechnologies and nanomaterials. Available at http://www.etcgroup.org/en/issues/nanotechnology.html. Accessed 12 Jan 2009
Executive Order 12866 (1993) Regulatory planning and review. Fed Regist 58:51735
Executive Order 13422 (2007) Further amendment to executive order 12866 on regulatory planning and review. Fed Regist 72:2763
Executive Order 13497 (2009) Revocation of certain executive orders concerning regulatory planning and review. Fed Regist 74:6113
General Accountability Office (2004) OSHA’s voluntary compliance strategies show promising results, but should be fully evaluated before they are expanded. GAO-04-378. http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d04378.pdf. Accessed 12 Jan 2009
Han JH, Lee EJ, Lee JH et al (2008) Monitoring multiwalled carbon nanotube exposure in carbon nanotube research facility. Inhal Toxicol 20:1–9. doi:10.1080/08958370701758593
Hansen SF, Larsen BH, Olsen SI et al (2007) Categorization framework to aid hazard identification of nanomaterials. Nanotoxicology 1:243–250. doi:10.1080/17435390701727509
Hansen SF, Maynard A, Baun A et al (2008) Late lessons from early warnings about nanotechnology. Nat Nanotechnol 3:444–447. doi:10.1038/nnano.2008.198
Harremoës P, Gee D, MacGavin M et al (2001) Late lessons from early warnings: the precautionary principle 1896–2000. European Environmental Agency, Copenhagen. http://reports.eea.europa.eu/environmental_issue_report_2001_22/en. Accessed 12 Jan 2009
Industrial Union Department vs. American Petroleum Institute (1980) 44 U.S. 607, 642
Information Quality Act in Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2001 Pub. L. No. 106–554, § 515(a) (2000)
Koshi S (1980) Proposition for a method of evaluating the work environment with regard to air-borne toxic substances. Ind Health 18:179–186
Kuempel ED, Geraci CL, Schulte PA (2007) Risk assessment approaches and research needs for nanoparticles: an examination of data and information from current studies. In: Simeonova PP, Opopol N, Luster MI (eds) Nanotechnology–toxicological issues and environmental safety. Springer, New York, pp 119–145
Kuhlbusch TAJ, Fissan H (2006) Particle characteristics in the reactor and pelletizing areas of carbon black production. J Occup Environ Health 3:558–567
Lam C-W, James JT, McCluskey R et al (2004) Pulmonary toxicity of single-wall carbon nanotubes in mice 7 and 90 days after intratracheal instillation. Toxicol Sci 77:126–134. doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfg243
Lux Research, Inc (2007) The nanotech report: investment overview and market research for nanotechnology, 5th edn. New York
Lux Research, Inc (2008) Nanomaterials: Corporate strategy. http://www.luxresearchinc.com/. Accessed 10 Jan 2009
Marchant G, Sylvester D, Abbott KW (2007) Nanotechnology regulation: the United States approach. In: Hodge G, Bowman D, Ludlow K (eds) New global frontiers in regulation. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 189–211
Mazurek JM, Wood MS (2008) Asbestos-related years of potential life lost before age 65 years—United States, 1968–2005. Mortal Morb Wkly Rep 57:1321–1325
McGarity TO (1992) Some thoughts on “deossifying” the rulemaking process. Duke Law J 41:1385–1462. doi:10.2307/1372818
McGarity TO (2005) Daubert and the proper role for the courts in health, safety, and environmental regulation. Am J Public Health 95(S1):S92–S98. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2004.044545
McGarity T, Shapiro S (1993) Workers at risk: the failed promise of the occupational safety and health administration. Praeger, Westport
Mendeloff J (1988) The dilemma of toxic substance regulation: how overregulation causes underregulation at OSHA. MIT Press, Cambridge
Methner MM, Birch ME, Evans DE et al (2007) Case study: identification and characterization of potential sources of worker exposure to carbon nanofibers during polymer composite laboratory operations. J Occup Environ Hyg 4:D125–D130. doi:10.1080/15459620701683871
Munich Re Group (2002) Nanotechnology: what is in store for us? Munich Re Group, Munich, Germany
Murashov V, Howard J (2009) Essential features of proactive occupational risk management of emerging technologies: the example of nanotechnology. Nature Nanotechnology (accepted)
Nanotransport Project (2008) Behavior of aerosols released to ambient air from nanoparticle manufacturing. http://research.dnv.com/nanotransport/NANOTRANSPORTdownload/NANOTRANSPORT_Pilar08_f_rev.pdf. Accessed 12 Jan 2009
Nasterlack M, Zober A, Oberlinner C (2008) Considerations on occupational medical surveillance in employees handling nanoparticles. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 8:721–726. doi:10.1007/s00420-007-0245-5
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (2008) Strategic plan for NIOSH nanotechnology research: filling the knowledge gaps. http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/nanotech/strat_plan.html. Accessed 16 Jan 2009
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (2009a) Approaches to safe nanotechnology: managing the health and safety concerns associated with engineered nanomaterials. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2009-125
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (2009b) Interim guidance for medical screening and hazard surveillance for workers potentially exposed to engineered nanoparticles. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2009-116
National Research Council (NRC) (2008) Review of the federal strategy for nanotechnology-related environment, health, and safety research. The National Academies Press, Washington
Naumann BD, Sargent EV, Starkman BS et al (1996) Performance-based exposure control limits for pharmaceutically active ingredients. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 57:33–42. doi:10.1080/15428119691015197
Oberdörster G, Oberdörster E, Oberdörster J (2007) Concepts of nanoparticle dose metric and response metric. Environ Health Perspect 115:A290
Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, 29 USC §§ 651–678:2000
Old L, Methner MM (2008) Engineering case reports. J Occup Environ Hyg 5:D63–D69. doi:10.1080/15459620802059393
OMB (2001) Guidelines for ensuring and maximizing the quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of information disseminated by Federal Agencies. http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/fedreg/final_information_quality_guidelines.html. Accessed 16 Jan 2009
OMB (2005) Final information quality bulletin for peer review Federal Register OMB 70:2664-2667
OMB (2007a) OMB issued a memorandum (M-07-13) on the implementation of Executive Order 13422 on April 25, 2007. http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/inforeg/regpol.html
OMB (2007b) 72 Fed. Reg. 3432-3440
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (2008) Working party on manufactured nanomaterials: list of manufactured nanomaterials and list of endpoints for phase one of the OECD Testing Programme [ENV/JM/MONO(2008)13/REV]. http://www.olis.oecd.org/olis/2008doc.nsf/LinkTo/NT000034C6/$FILE/JT03248749.PDF. Accessed 1 Feb 2009
OSHA (1989) Air contaminants. Fed Regist 54:2332
OSHA (1998) Draft Proposed Safety and Health Program Rule, 29 C.F.R. 1900.1. Docket No. S&H-0027 (1998). Available at http://www.osha.gov/SLTC/safetyhealth/nshp.html. Accessed 12 Jan 2009
OSHA (2006) Occupational exposure to hexavalent chromium final rule. Federal Register 71:10100 (codified at 29 CFR §1910.1026)
OSHA (2008) Voluntary protection program: policy and procedures manual. CSP 03-01-003. Available at http://www.osha.gov/OshDoc/Directive_pdf/CSP_03-01-003.pdf. Accessed 12 Jan 2009
Paik SY, Zalk DM, Swuste P (2008) Application of a pilot control banding tool for risk level assessment and control of nanoparticle exposures. Ann Occup Hyg 52(6):419–428. doi:10.1093/annhyg/men041
Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 United States Code § 3501:1995
Peters T, Heitbrink W, Evans D et al (2006) The mapping of fine and ultrafine particle concentrations in an engine machining and assembly facility. Ann Occup Hyg 50:1–9. doi:10.1093/annhyg/mel067
Poland C, Duffin R, Kirloch I et al (2008) Carbon nanotubes introduced into the abdominal cavity of mice show asbestos-like pathogenicity in a pilot study. Nat Nanotechnol 3:423–428. doi:10.1038/nnano.2008.111
Public Citizen Health Research Group v. Tyson, 796 F2d 1479 (D.C. Cir. 1986)
Pui DYH, Qi C, Stanley N, Oberdorster G, Maynard A (2008) Recirculating air filtration significantly reduces exposure to airborne nanoparticles. Environ Health Perspect 116(7):863–866
Rabinowitz R (Editor-in-Chief) (2002) Occupational safety and health law, 2nd edn. Bureau of National Affairs, Washington, pp 485–486
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 United States Code § 603(a):1980
Schulte PA, Geraci C, Zumwalde R (2008a) Sharpening the focus on occupational safety and health in nanotechnology. Scand J Work Environ Health 34(6):471–478
Schulte PA, Trout D, Zumwalde RD et al (2008b) Options for occupational health surveillance of workers potentially exposed to engineered nanoparticles: state of the science. J Occup Environ Med 50(5):517–526. doi:10.1097/JOM.0b013e31816515f7
Schulte PA, Schubauer-Berigan M, Mayweather C et al (2009) Issues in the development of epidemiologic studies of workers exposed to engineered nanoparticles. JOEM 51:1–13
Shvedova AA, Kisin ER, Murray AR et al (2008) Inhalation versus aspiration of single walled carbon nanotubes in C57BL/6 mice: inflammation, fibrosis, oxidative stress and mutagenesis. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 295:L552–L565. doi:10.1152/ajplung.90287.2008
Shvedova AA, Kisin ER, Porter D et al (2009) Mechanisms of pulmonary toxicity and medical applications of carbon nanotubes: two faces of Janus? Pharmacol Ther 121:192–204. doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2008.10.009
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement and Fairness Act, 5 United States Code Part 611:1996
Sng J, Koh D (2008) Nanocommentary: occupational and environmental health and nanotechnology—what’s new? Occup Med 58:454–455. doi:10.1093/occmed/kqn132
Swiss Re (2004) Nanotechnology: small matter, many unknowns. http://www.swissre.com/pws/research%20publications/risk%20and%20expertise/risk%20perception/nanotechnology_small_matter_many_unknowns_pdf_page.html. Accessed 11 Jan 2009
Tsai S-J, Ashter A, Ada E et al (2008) Airborne nanoparticle release associated with the compounding of nanocomposites using nanoalumina as fillers. Aerosol Air Qual Res 8:160–177
U.S. Department of Energy (2009) Notice: the safe handling of unbound engineered nanoparticles. DOE N 456.1. Available at http://www.directives.doe.gov/pdfs/doe/doetext/neword/456/n4561.pdf. Accessed 14 Jan 2009
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2008) Nanoscale Materials Stewardship Program. Available at http://www.epa.gov/oppt/nano/stewardship.htm. Accessed 12 January 2009
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2009) Nanoscale Materials Stewardship Program. Interim Report. Available at http://epa.gov/oppt/nano/nmsp-interim-report-final.pdf. Accessed 14 January 2009
van Wendel-de-Joode B, Brouwer DH, Vermeulen R et al (2003) DREAM: a method for semi-quantitative dermal exposure assessment. Ann Occup Hyg 47:71–87. doi:10.1093/annhyg/meg012
Wang J, Chen C, Liu Y et al (2008) Potential neurological lesion after nasal instillation of TiO2 nanoparticles in the anatase and rutile crystal phases. Toxicol Lett 183:72–80. doi:10.1016/j.toxlet.2008.10.001
Watch OMB (2005) OMB Watch analysis on final peer review bulletin. http://www.ombwatch.org/article/articleview/2594/1/232?TopicID=3. Accessed 23 Jan 2009
Woodrow Wilson Center Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies (2008) Consumer products inventory. http://www.nanotechproject.org/inventories/consumer/. Accessed 10 Jan 2009
Acknowledgment
Disclaimer: The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Howard, J., Murashov, V. National nanotechnology partnership to protect workers. J Nanopart Res 11, 1673–1683 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-009-9682-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-009-9682-2