Skip to main content
Log in

Use of an electrical aerosol detector (EAD) for nanoparticle size distribution measurement

  • Nanoparticles and Occupational Health
  • Published:
Journal of Nanoparticle Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recently, Nanoparticle Surface Area Monitor (NSAM, TSI model 3550) and EAD (EAD, TSI Model 3070A) have been commercially available to measure the integral parameters (i.e., total particle surface area and total particle length) of nanoparticles. By comparison, the configuration of the EAD or NSAM is similar to that of electrical mobility analyzer of the early generation for particle size distribution measurement. It is therefore possible to use the EAD or NSAM as a particle sizer. To realize the objective of using the EAD as a sizer, we characterized the average electrical charges of monodisperse particles passing through the EAD particle charger and ion trap set at voltages ranging from 20 to 2500 V. The average charge data collected at different ion-trap voltages were then summarized by the empirical correlation using the parameter of Z p *V, where Z p is the particle electrical mobility and V is the ion-trap voltage. A data-reduction scheme was further proposed to retrieve the size distribution of sampled particles from the EAD readout at different ion-trap voltages. In the scheme, the functional format of each mode in a number size distribution of particles was assumed as log-normal, but the number of modes in an entire size distribution is not limited. A criterion was used to best fit the simulated EAD readouts with experimental ones by varying the count median diameter (CMD), geometric standard deviation (σ g), and total particle number (N t ) of each mode in a particle size distribution. Experiments were performed to verify the proposed scheme.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Donaldson K, Li XY, MacNee W (1998) Ultrafine (nanometer) particle mediated lung injury. J Aerosol Sci 29(5–6):553–560

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fissan H, Trampe A, Neunman S, Pui DYH, Shin WG (2007) Rationale and principle of an instrument measuring lung deposition area. J Nanoparticle Res 9:53–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleiter H (1989) Nanocrystalline materials. Prog Mater Sci 33:223–315

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hinds W (1999) Aerosol technology: properties, behavior, and measurement of airborne particles. Wiley-Interscience, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Keskinen J, Pietarinen K, Lehtimaki M (1992) Electrical Low Pressure Impactor. J Aerosol Sci 23:353

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Knutson EO, Whitby KT (1975) Aerosol classification by electric mobility: apparatus, theory, and applications. J Aerosol Sci 6:443–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin SJ, Granstaff VE, Frye GC (1991) Characterisation of a quartz crystal microbalance with simultaneous mass and liquid loading. Anal Chem 63:2272–2281

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oberdörster G (1996) Significance of particle parameters in the evaluation of exposure-dose–response relationships of inhaled particles. Part Sci Technol 14(2):135–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oberdörster G, Oberdörster E, Oberdörster J (2005) Invited review: nanotechnology: an emerging discipline evolving from studies of ultrafine particles. Environ Health Perspect 113(7):823–839

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Park D, Kim S, An M, Hwang J (2007a) Real-time measurement of submicron aerosol particles having a log-normal size distribution by simultaneously using unipolar diffusion charger and unipolar field charger. J Aerosol Sci 38:1240–1245

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Park D, An M, Hwang J (2007b) Development and performance test of a unipolar diffusion charger for real-time measurements of submicron aerosol particles having a log-normal size distribution. J Aerosol Sci 38(4):420–430

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Patashnick H, Rupprecht EG (1991) Continuous PM–10 measurements using the tapered element oscillating microbalance. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 41:1079–1083

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scheibel HG, Porstendorfer J (1983) Generation of monodisperse Ag and NaCl aerosol with particle diameters between 2 and 300 nm. J Aerosol Sci 14:113–126

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stoltzenburg MR, McMurry PH (1991) An ultrafine aerosol condensation nucleus counter. Aerosol Sci Technol 14:48–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson WE, Han HS, Stanek J, Turner J, Chen DR, Pui DYH (2004) Use of electrical aerosol detector as an indicator for the total particle surface area deposited in the lung. Symposium on air quality measurement methods and technology sponsored by the Air and Waste Management Association. Research Triangle Park, NC. Paper #37

  • Woo KS, Chen DR, Pui DYH, Wilson WE (2001) Use of continuous measurements of integral aerosol parameters to estimate particle surface area. Aerosol Sci Technol 34:57–65

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Perng-Jy Tsai.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, L., Chen, DR. & Tsai, PJ. Use of an electrical aerosol detector (EAD) for nanoparticle size distribution measurement. J Nanopart Res 11, 111–120 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-008-9418-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-008-9418-8

Keywords

Navigation