Abstract
This paper argues that lexical and operator-based analyses of distributivity are not in conflict, but are both necessary components of any theory of distributivity that aims to account for all the relevant data. I use several contrasts between plural definites (e.g. the girls) and group NPs (e.g. the group of girls) to show that we need an operator-based analysis of distributivity; this kind of distributivity is available with plural definites but not with group subjects, which can be explained under the common assumption that group NPs denote atoms rather than sums and hence do not allow quantification over their individual parts. At the same time, we need a lexical theory of distributivity to account for the various distributive interpretations that we do find with groups; a formalisation of such a theory is outlined in the final section of this paper.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Barker, C. 1992. Group terms in English: Representing groups as atoms. Journal of Semantics 9 (1): 69–93.
Bartsch, R. 1973. The semantics and syntax of number and numbers. Syntax and Semantics 2: 51–93.
Bennett, M. 1974. Some extensions of a Montague fragment of English. PhD dissertation, UCLA.
Birkenes, M.B., and F. Sommer. 2014. The agreement of collective nouns in the history of Ancient Greek and German. In Language change at the syntax-semantics interface, ed. C. Gianollo, A. Jaeger, and D. Penka, 183–221. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.
Bock, K., A. Cutler, K. Eberhard, S. Butterfield, C. Cutting, and K. Humphreys. 2006. Number agreement in British and American English: Disagreeing to agree collectively. Language 82 (1): 64–113.
Brisson, C. 1998. Distributivity, maximality and floating quantifiers. PhD dissertation, Rutgers University.
Brisson, C. 2003. Plurals, all, and the nonuniformity of collective predication. Journal of Semantics 26: 129–184.
Champollion, L. 2010. Parts of a whole: Distributivity as a bridge between aspect and measurement. PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Chierchia, G. 1998. Reference to kinds across language. Natural Language Semantics 6 (1): 339–405.
Corbett, G. 2000. Number. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
de Vries, H. 2013. Distributivity and agreement: New evidence for groups as sets. In Proceedings of the 19th Amsterdam Colloquium, ed. M. Aloni, M. Franke, and F. Roelofsen, 241–248. Amsterdam: ILLC.
de Vries, H. 2014. Lexical distributivity with group nouns and property indefinites. In Proceedings of NELS 43, ed. H.-L. Huang, E. Poole, and A. Rysling, 91–102. Amherst, MA: GLSA.
de Vries, H. 2015. Shifting sets, hidden atoms: the semantics of distributivity, plurality and animacy. PhD dissertation, Utrecht University.
Dowty, D. 1987. A note on collective predicates, distributive predicates, and all. In Proceedings of the Third Eastern States Conference on Linguistics, ed. F. Marshal. Columbus: The Ohio State University.
Gillon, B. 1987. The readings of plural noun phrases in English. Linguistics and Philosophy 10: 199–219.
Hoeksema, J. 1988. The semantics of non-Boolean ’and’. Journal of Semantics 6: 19–40.
Kleiber, G. 1989. ’Le’ generique: Un massif? Langage 94: 73–113.
Kratzer, A. 2008. On the plurality of verbs. In Event structures in linguistic form and interpretation, ed. J. Dölling, T. Heyde-Zybatow, and M. Schäfer, 269–300. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Krifka, M. 1990. Boolean and non-Boolean ’and’. In Papers from the second Colloquium on Logic and Language, ed. L. Kalman and L. Polos, 161–188. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
Krifka, M. 2003. Bare NPs: Kind-referring, indefinites, both, or neither? In Proceedings of SALT 13, ed. R.B. Young and Y. Zhou, 1–24. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.
Kroch, A. 1974. The semantics of scope in English. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Landman, F. 1989. Groups. Linguistics and Philosophy 12: 559–605, 723–744.
Landman, F. 1996. Plurality. In The handbook of contemporary semantic theory, ed. S. Lappin, 425–457. Oxford: Blackwell.
Landman, F. 2000. Events and plurality: The Jerusalem lectures. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Lasersohn, P. 1989. On the readings of plural noun phrases. Linguistic Inquiry 20: 130–134.
Lasersohn, P. 1990. Group action and spatio-temporal proximity. Linguistics and Philosophy 13 (2): 179–206.
Lasersohn, P. 1995. Plurality, conjunction and events. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Lasersohn, P. 1999. Pragmatic halos. Language 75 (3): 522–551.
Link, G. 1983. The logical analysis of plurals and mass terms: A lattice-theoretical approach. In Meaning, use and interpretation of language, ed. R. Bäuerle, C. Schwarze, and A. von Stechow, 302–323. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Link, G. 1984. Hydras. On the logic of relative constructions with multiple heads. In Varieties of formal semantics, ed. F. Landman and F. Veltman, 245–257. Dordrecht: Foris.
Link, G. 1987. Generalized quantifiers and plurals. In Generalized quantifiers: Linguistic and logical approaches, ed. P. Gardenfors, 151–180. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Magri, G. 2012. Collective nouns without groups. In Proceedings of IATL 27, ed. E. Cohen, 183–202. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Pearson, H. 2011. A new semantics for group nouns. In Proceedings of WCCFL 28, ed. M.B. Washburn, et al., 160–168. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Pollard, C., and I. Sag. 1994. Head-driven phrase structure grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Poortman, E. 2014. Between intersective and ’split’ interpretations of predicate conjunction: The role of typicality. In Proceedings of the Formal & Experimental Pragmatics Workshop, (ESSLI 2014), ed. J. Degen, M. Franke, and N. Goodman, 36–42. Tübingen University.
Poortman, E. 2017. Concepts and plural predication (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Utrecht University.
Roberts, C. 1987. Modal subordination, anaphora, and distributivity. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
Scha, R. 1981. Distributive, collective and cumulative quantification. In Formal methods in the study of language, ed. J. Groenendijk, M. Stokhof, and T. Janssen, 483–512. Amsterdam: Mathematisch Centrum.
Schwarzschild, R. 1996. Pluralities. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Schwarzschild, R. 2009. Stubborn distributivity, multiparticipant nouns and the count/mass distinction. In Proceedings of NELS 39, ed. S. Lima, K. Mullin, and B. Smith, 661–678. Amherst, MA: GLSA.
Verkuyl, H. 1994. Distributivity and collectivity: A couple at odds. In Dynamics, polarity, and quantification, ed. M. Kanazawa and C. Pinon. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Verkuyl, H., and J. van der Does. 1996. The semantics of plural noun phrases. In Quantifiers, logic and language (CSLI Lecture Notes 54), ed. J. van der Does and J. van Eyck. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Winter, Y. 1997. Choice functions and the scopal semantics of indefinites. Linguistics and Philosophy 20: 399–467.
Winter, Y. 2000. Distributivity and dependency. Natural Language Semantics 8: 27–69.
Winter, Y. 2001. Plural predication and the Strongest Meaning Hypothesis. Journal of Semantics 18: 333–365.
Winter, Y. 2002. Atoms and sets: A characterization of semantic number. Linguistic Inquiry 33: 493–505.
Winter, Y., and R. Scha. 2015. Plurals. In Handbook of contemporary semantics, 2nd ed, ed. S. Lappin and C. Fox, 77–113. New York: Wiley.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This paper owes a lot to comments from and discussions with Yoad Winter, Roger Schwarzschild, Lucas Champollion, Remko Scha, the audience at NELS 2012, and two anonymous reviewers. The research reported in this paper was funded by an NWO Vici grant to Yoad Winter.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
de Vries, H. Two kinds of distributivity. Nat Lang Semantics 25, 173–197 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-017-9133-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-017-9133-z