Skip to main content
Log in

On the operator freezing effect

  • syntax
  • Published:
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Based on a number of operations creating operator-variable chains, namely, wh-movement, focalization, topicalization, quantifier raising, and the NPI-licensing movement, the article argues that operators in operator-variable chains cannot undergo further operator movement. It is shown that the generalization in question can be deduced from Chomsky’s (2000, 2001a) Activation Condition. The article also discusses the contexts where Bulgarian, a multiple wh-fronting language, allows extraction out of wh-islands. A new generalization is proposed regarding the ability of languages like Bulgarian to violate the Wh-Island Constraint in the contexts in question, which dissociates it from multiple wh-fronting and ties it to a property of D, in particular, availability of affixal articles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abney, S. (1987). The English noun phrase in its sentential aspect. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.

  • Agüero-Bautista, C. (2001). Cyclicity and the scope of wh-phrases. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.

  • Barbosa, P. (1995). Null subjects. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.

  • Bejar, S., & Massam, D. (1999). Multiple case checking. Syntax, 2, 65–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belletti, A. (1988). The case of unaccusatives. Linguistic Inquiry, 19, 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boeckx, C. (2003). Symmetries and asymmetries in multiple checking. In C. Boeckx, & K. Grohmann (Eds.) Multiple wh-fronting (pp. 17–26). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bošković, Ž. (1997a). Superiority effects with multiple wh-fronting in Serbo-Croatian. Lingua, 102, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bošković, Ž. (1997b). Fronting wh-phrases in Serbo-Croatian. In M. Lindseth & S. Franks (Eds.) Proceedings of the V Annual Workshop on Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics (pp. 86–107). Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bošković, Ž. (1999). On multiple feature-checking: Multiple wh-fronting and multiple head-movement. In S. Epstein & N. Hornstein (Eds.) Working minimalism (pp. 159–187). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bošković, Ž. (2002a). On multiple wh-fronting. Linguistic Inquiry, 33, 351–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bošković, Ž. (2002b). A-movement and the EPP. Syntax, 5, 167–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bošković, Ž. (2003). On wh-islands and obligatory wh-movement contexts in South Slavic. In C. Boeckx & K. Grohmann (Eds.) Multiple wh-fronting (pp. 27–50). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bošković, Ž. (2005). On the locality of left branch extraction and the structure of NP. Studia Linguistica, 59, 1–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bošković, Ž. (2007). On the locality and motivation of Move and Agree: An even more minimal theory. Linguistic Inquiry, 38, 589–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bošković, Ž. (in press a). The NP/DP analysis and Slovenian. Proceedings of the University of Novi Sad Workshop on Generative Syntax 1.

  • Bošković, Ž. (in press b). On successive cyclic movement and the freezing effect of feature checking. In J. Hartmann, V. Hegedüs & H. van Riemsdijk (Eds.), Sounds of silence: Empty elements in syntax and phonology. Amsterdam: Elsevier North Holland.

  • Bošković, Ž. (in preparation). Review of Wh-movement: Moving on by Lisa Lai-Shen Cheng and Norbert Corver. To appear in Language.

  • Bošković, Ž., & Lasnik, H. (1999). How strict is the cycle? Linguistic Inquiry, 30, 691–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bošković, Ž., & Takahashi, D. (1998). Scrambling and last resort. Linguistic Inquiry, 29, 347–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, J. (1987). Extended X-bar theory, the ECP, and the left branch condition. In M. Crowhurst (Ed.) Proceedings of the Sixth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (pp. 47–62). Stanford: Stanford Linguistic Association, Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, H.-W. (1999). Optimizing structure in context: Scrambling and information structure. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (2000). Minimalist inquiries. In R. Martin, D. Michaels, & J. Uriagereka (Eds.) Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik (pp. 89–155). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (2001a). Derivation by phase. In M. Kenstowicz (Ed.) Ken Hale: A life in language (pp. 1–52). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (2001b). Beyond explanatory adequacy. In V. Lindblad & M. Gamon (Eds.) MIT working papers in linguistics 20: Papers from SCIL V (pp. 1–28). Cambridge, MA: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (2005). Three factors in language design. Linguistic Inquiry, 36, 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (in press). On phases. In R. Freidin, C. P. Otero & M. L. Zubizarreta (Eds.), Foundational issues in linguistic theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Chomsky, N., & Lasnik, H. (1993). The theory of principles and parameters. In J. Jacobs, A. von Stechow, W. Sternefeld, & T. Vennemann (Eds.) Syntax: An international handbook of contemporary research, Vol. 1 (pp. 506–569). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comorovski, I. (1986). Multiple wh-movement in Romanian. Linguistic Inquiry, 17, 171–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comorovski, I. (1996). Interrogative phrases and the syntax-semantics interface. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowper, E. (1988). What is a subject? Non-nominative subjects in Icelandic. In J. Blevins & J. Carter (Eds.) Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society 18 (pp. 94–108). Amherst: Graduate Linguistic Student Association, University of Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Culicover, P. (1996). On distinguishing A′-movements. Linguistic Inquiry, 27, 445–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delsing, L.-O. (1993). The internal structure of Noun Phrases in the Scandinavian languages, Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Lund.

  • den Dikken, M. (2003). On the morphosyntax of wh-movement. In C. Boeckx & K. Grohmann (Eds.) Multiple wh-fronting (pp. 77–98). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • den Dikken, M., & Giannakidou, A. (2002). From hell to polarity. Linguistic Inquiry, 33, 31–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diesing, M. (1992). Indefinites. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engdahl, E. (1986). Constituent questions. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, S. D. (1992). Derivational constraints on A′-chain formation. Linguistic Inquiry, 23, 235–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, G., & Franks, S. (1994). The structure of DP in Bulgarian. Indiana Linguistic Studies, 7, 58–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, D., & Nissenbaum, J. (1999). Extraposition and scope: A case for overt QR. In S. Bird, A. Carnie, J. D. Haugen, & P. Norquest (Eds.) Proceedings of the 18th West Coast Conference on formal linguistics (pp. 43–54). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frampton, J., & Gutmann, S. (1999). Cyclic computation, a computationally efficient minimalist syntax. Syntax, 2, 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franks, S. (1998). Clitics in Slavic. Paper presented at the Comparative Slavic Morphosyntax Workshop, Spencer, IN.

  • Freidin, R., & Sprouse, R. (1991). Lexical case phenomena. In R. Freidin (Ed.) Principles and parameters in comparative grammar (pp. 392–416). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giannakidou, A. (1998). Polarity sensitivity as (non)veridical dependency. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grewendorf, G. (2001). Multiple wh-fronting. Linguistic Inquiry, 32, 87–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grewendorf, G. (2005). The discourse configurationality of scrambling. In J. Sabel & M. Saito (Eds.) The free word order phenomenon: Its syntactic sources and diversity (pp. 75–135). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grewendorf, G., & Sabel, J. (1999). Scrambling in German and Japanese: Adjunction vs. multiple specifiers. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 17, 1–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grohmann, K. (1998). Syntactic inquiries into discourse restrictions on multiple interrogatives. Groninger Arbeiten Zur Germanistischen Linguistik, 42, 1–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grohmann, K. (2003). Prolific domains: on the anti-locality of movement dependencies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, A. L. (1995). On the placement and morphology of clitics. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harada, K. (1972). Constraints on wh-Q binding. In Studies in descriptive and applied linguistics, 5, 180–206.

  • Heck, F., & Müller, G. (2003). Derivational optimization of wh-movement. Linguistic Analysis, 33, 97–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herburger, E. (1994). A semantic difference between full and partial wh-movement in German. Paper presented at the 68th Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Boston, MA.

  • Hiraiwa, K. (2005). Dimensions of symmetry in syntax: Agreement and clausal architecture. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.

  • Hornstein, N. (1999). Minimalism and quantifier raising. In S. Epstein & N. Hornstein (Eds.) Working minimalism (pp. 45–75). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsin, T.-H. (1997). On the grammatical status of temporal and locative WHs. Unpublished manuscript, University of Connecticut.

  • Huang, C.-T. J. (1982). Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.

  • Izvorski, R. (1996). The syntax and semantics of correlative proforms. In K. Kusumoto (Ed.) Proceedings of the North East Linguistics Society 26 (pp. 133–147). Amherst, MA: Graduate Linguistic Student Association, University of Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Izvorski, R. (1998). Non-indicative wh-complements of possessive and existential predicates. In P. N. Tamanji & K. Kusumoto (Eds.) Proceedings of North East Linguistics Society 28 (pp. 159–173). Amherst, MA: Graduate Linguistic Student Association, University of Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Julien, M. (2002). Determiners and word order in Scandinavian. Studia Linguistica, 56, 264–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kawashima, R., & Kitahara, H. (1992). Licensing of negative polarity items and checking theory: A comparative study of English and Japanese. In L. S. Stvan, S. Ryberg, M. B. Olsen, T. Macfarland, L. DiDesidero, A. Bertram, & L. Adams (Eds.) FLSM III: Papers from the third annual meeting of the Formal Linguistics Society of Midamerica (pp. 139–154). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club, Indiana University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J.-S. (1997). Syntactic focus movement and ellipsis: A minimalist approach. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Connecticut.

  • Kiss, K. (1987). Configurationality in Hungarian. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiss, K. (1991). Logical structure in syntactic structure: The case of Hungarian. In C.-T. J. Huang & R. May (Eds.) Logical structure and linguistic structure: Cross-linguistic perspectives (pp. 111–148). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koizumi, M. (1994). Layered specifiers. In M. Gonzàlez (Ed.) Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society 24 (pp. 255–269). Amherst, MA: Graduate Linguistic Student Association, University of Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koizumi, M. (1995). Phrase structure in minimalist syntax. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.

  • Krapova, I., & Cinque, G. (2003). On the order of wh-phrases in Bulgarian multiple wh-fronting. Paper presented at the Fifth European Conference on Formal Description of Slavic Languages (FDSL 5), University of Leipzig.

  • Lasnik, H. (1995). Last resort. In S. Haraguchi & M. Funaki (Eds.) Minimalism and linguistic theory (pp. 1–32). Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasnik, H., & Saito, M. (1991). On the subject of infinitives. In L. M. Dobrin, L. Nichols, & R. M. Rodriguez (Eds.) Papers from the 27th regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society part one: The general session (pp. 324–343). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasnik, H., & Uriagereka, J. (1988). A course in GB syntax: Lectures on binding and empty categories. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, R. K. (1994). Economy of representation. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Connecticut.

  • Lenerz, J. (1977). Zur Abfolge nominaler Satzglieder im Deutschen. Tübingen: Narr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maling, J. (1978). An asymmetry with respect to wh-islands. Linguistic Inquiry, 9, 75–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moltmann, F. (1991). Scrambling in German and the specificity effect. Unpublished manuscript, MIT.

  • Müller, G. (1998). Incomplete category fronting: A derivational approach to remnant movement in German. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, G. (2001). Order preservation, parallel movement, and the emergence of the unmarked. In G. Legendre, J. Grimshaw, & S. Vikner (Eds.) Optimality-theoretic syntax (pp. 279–313). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, G., & Sternefeld, W. (1993). Improper movement and unambiguous binding. Linguistic Inquiry, 24, 461–507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, G., & Sternefeld, W. (1996). A′-chain formation and economy of derivation. Linguistic Inquiry, 27, 480–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishigauchi, T. (1990). Quantification in the theory of grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nissenbaum, J. (2000). Investigations of covert phrase movement. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.

  • Ordoñez, F. (1997). Word order and clause structure in Spanish and other Romance languages. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, City University of New York.

  • Pesetsky, D. (2000). Phrasal movement and its kin. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Postal, P. M. (1966). On so-called pronouns in English. In F. P. Dinneen (Ed.) The nineteenth monograph on language and linguistics (pp. 178–206). Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Progovac, L. (1994). Negative and positive polarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhart, T. (1981). A second Comp position. In A. Belletti, L. Brandi, & L. Rizzi (Eds.) Theory of markedness of grammar - Proceedings of the 1979 GLOW conference (pp. 515–557). Pisa: Normale Superiore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reglero, L. (2003). Non-wh-fronting in Basque. In C. Boeckx & K. Grohmann (Eds.) Multiple wh-fronting (pp. 187–227). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reglero, L. (2004). On A-dependencies in Spanish and Basque. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Connecticut.

  • Roehrs, D. (2006). The morpho-syntax of the Germanic Noun Phrase: Determiners move into the Determiner Phrase. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Indiana University.

  • Richards, N. (1997). What moves where when in which language. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.

  • Richards, N. (1998). Shortest moves to (anti-)superiority. In E. Curtis, J. Lyle, & G. Webster (Eds.) Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 16 (pp. 335–349). Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, N. (2001). Movement in language: Interactions and architectures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, N. (2006). A distinctness condition on linearization. Unpublished manuscript, MIT.

  • Rizzi, L. (1982). Issues in Italian syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzi, L. (1991). Residual verb second and the wh-criterion. Unpublished manuscript, University of Geneva.

  • Rizzi, L. (2006). On the form of chains: Criterial positions and ECP effects. In L. L.-S. Cheng & N. Corver (Eds.) Wh-movement: Moving on (pp. 97–133). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudin, C. (1988). On multiple questions and multiple wh-fronting. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 6, 445–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saddock, J. (1991). Autolexical Syntax: A theory of parallel grammatical representations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saito, M. (1989). Scrambling as semantically vacuous A′-movement. In M. R. Baltin & A. S. Kroch (Eds.) Alternative conceptions of phrase structure (pp. 182–200). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saito, M. (1992). Long distance scrambling in Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 1, 69–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santelmann, L. (1993). The distribution of double determiners in Swedish. Den support in D0. Studia Linguistica, 47, 154–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauerland, U. (1999). Erasability and interpretation. Syntax, 2, 161–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sohn, K.-W. (1995). Negative polarity items, scope, and economy. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Connecticut.

  • Stjepanović, S. (1999). What do second position cliticization, scrambling, and multiple wh-fronting have in common? Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Connecticut.

  • Stjepanović, S. (2003). A word-order paradox resolved by copy deletion at PF. Linguistic Variation Yearbook, 3, 139–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stowell, T. (1981). Origins of phrase structure. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.

  • Stowell, T. (1989). Subjects, specifiers, and X-bar theory. In M. R. Baltin & A. S. Kroch (Eds.) Alternative conceptions of phrase structure (pp. 232–262). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svenonius, P. (2004). On the edge. In D. Adger, C. de Cat, & G. Tsoulas (Eds.) Peripheries: Syntactic edges and their effects (pp. 261–287). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szabolcsi, A. (1997). Strategies for scope taking. In A. Szabolcsi (Ed.) Ways of scope taking (pp. 109–154). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tada, H. (1993). A/Apartition in derivation. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.

  • Takahashi, D. (1994). Minimality of movement. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Connecticut.

  • Tomić, O. M. (1996). The Balkan Slavic nominal clitics. In A. Halpern & A. Zwicky (Eds.) Approaching second: Second position clitics and related phenomena (pp. 511–536). Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uribe-Echevarria, M. (1992). On the structural positions of subjects in Spanish, and their consequences for quantification. In J. A. Lakarra & J. O. de Urbina (Eds.) Syntactic theory and Basque syntax (pp. 447–493). San Sebastian: ASJU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vangsnes, Ø. A. (1999). The identification of functional architecture. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Bergen.

  • Watanabe, A. (1992). Wh-in-situ, Subjacency, and chain formation. In MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 2. Cambridge, MA: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.

  • Williams, E. (2006). Subjects of different heights. In J. Lavine, S. Franks, M. Tasseva-Kurkchieva, & H. Filip (Eds.)Proceedings of Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 14: The Princeton Meeting 2005 (pp. 409–427). Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, J. (1999). Syntax and semantics of quantification in Chinese. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Maryland.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Željko Bošković.

Additional information

For helpful comments and suggestions, I thank Marcel den Dikken, two NLLT reviewers, the participants of my seminars at the University of Connecticut, and the audiences at the European Conference on Formal Description of Slavic Languages 6 (Potsdam) and 7 (Leipzig). For help with the data, I am particularly grateful to Simona Herdan, Dalina Kallulli, Mariana Lambova, Christer Platzack, Roumyana Pancheva, Yael Sharvit, Halldór Ármann Sigurðsson, Roumyana Slabakova, Penka Stateva, and Tarald Taraldsen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bošković, Ž. On the operator freezing effect. Nat Language Linguistic Theory 26, 249–287 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-008-9037-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-008-9037-1

Keywords

Navigation